also saw many spiritual reformations‚ with the religion of the court changing just as often as the monarchs. This kind of political and religious unsettlement caused unsettlement within the population‚ which Elizabeth I addresses in her poem ‘The Doubt of Future Foes Exiles My Present Joy’‚ which would have been circulated publicly amongst her subjects. Elizabeth also caused discontentment within her own court by
Premium United States Government United Kingdom
reasonable doubt an effective safeguard in the jury system? In the play‚ Twelve Angry Men Reginald Rose depicts ‘reasonable doubt’ as an extremely effective defence in the jury system which leads to saving the accused from being sentenced. In the play the jurors are asked to determine whether the seventeen year old boy is ‘guilty’ of fatally stabbing his father beyond ‘reasonable doubt’ or not. Only Juror 8 plays a pivotal part in acquainting the other eleven jurors about ‘reasonable doubt’ and through
Premium Jury Jury trial Verdict
Compare and contrast how doubt and uncertainty are presented in Richard III and Macbeth Macbeth is a tragedy play written by William Shakespeare. The play is set in Scotland during the mid 11th century. But‚ the play was written in 1606 at a time where James I was on the throne. King James was a very superstitious man who believed in magic and witchcraft and these themes were presented in Macbeth to please the King. Also the political context is important as it was included in Macbeth with the ideas
Premium Macbeth William Shakespeare Question
If trust does not meet test of certainty it will fail/be void If trust to be valid must meet three certainties: (Knight v Knight) Certainty of intention Certainty of subject matter Certainty of objects/beneficiaries Fundamental principle: the trust must be capable of being controlled + enforced There must be “sufficient practical certainty in [the trust’s] definition for it to be carried out‚ if necessary with the administrative assistance of the court‚ according to the expressed intention
Premium Trust law
Descartes vs. Pascal For centuries‚ human beings have been debating over the validity of the use of reason. This is a very‚ very difficult subject to discuss‚ as one is forced to study something which is at that moment being used in their study. Two classic thinkers who contrasted on their view of reason were Descartes and Pascal. Though both saw reason as the primary source of knowledge‚ they disagreed over the competence of human reason. Descartes‚ the skeptic‚ said that we could use reason
Premium Epistemology Logic Truth
philosophy based on experiments and testing ideas‚ rather than theological beliefs. One of Descartes most famous books is called “Meditations of the First Philosophy”. The first chapter of this book is entitled “First Meditation: What Can Be Called into Doubt”. He starts this chapter by acknowledging that some of the concepts that we use to believe are not true‚ and uses this first philosophy to challenging our most basic ideas. He does this because he does not want to challenge each of his beliefs
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Philosophy
Descartes VS Hume René Descartes and David Hume touched upon epistemology on the same question‚ “where does human knowledge come from?” They both came to very different conclusions. Descartes claimed that our knowledge came from human reasoning alone and this is an absolute certainty principle. This faculty of reasoning is innate tool that came with human species. He called this tool‚ “mind‚” which is separated from our body. Hume on the other hand‚ claimed that human learned from observing the
Premium Epistemology Cognition Empiricism
When we think of true friendship‚ we think of the classics from Lucy and Ethel to Laurel and Hardy to even the beloved cartoon characters of Spongebob and Patrick. All these famous pairs are viewed as the epitome of what real friendship is about being there for one another through thick and thin and everything else in between. In A Prayer for Owen Meany by John Irving‚ another great pair of friends is dawned upon us - Owen Meany and Johnny Wheelwright. These two remarkable characters demonstrate
Premium
Descartes’ vs. Hospers Knowledge is an acquaintance with facts‚ truths‚ or principles‚ as from study of investigation and a familiarity or conversance‚ as with a particular subject or branch of learning. (3) Many philosophers have different perspectives of knowledge. Descartes’ believes that the only thing absolutely known is that you exist because you think. However‚ Hospers believes that there are different forms of knowing that must be proven with evidence. Descartes’ believes that you
Premium Epistemology Plato Truth
THIRD DIVISION [G.R. No. 154765. March 29‚ 2007.] PEDRO T. BERCERO‚ petitioner‚ vs. CAPITOL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION‚ 1 respondent. D E C I S I O N AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ‚ J p: Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court assailing the Decision 2 dated February 11‚ 2002 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 56484 which set aside the Decision 3 dated May 27‚ 1996 of the Regional Trial Court‚ Branch 88‚ Quezon City (RTC-Branch 88) in Civil Case
Premium Lease Appeal Trial court