Machiavelli argues that a leader should be both loved and feared‚ but if you had to pick one‚ pick fear. He favors fear over being loved‚ because it is safer for the leader to have his followers fear him than love him. It is easier to betray someone that you have love for‚ than someone that you fear. Machiavelli also believes that when you have an army‚ in order to keep them in harmony‚ they would have to fear you and respect your abilities as a leader. If they had no fear of their leader they would
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Florence
Machiavelli wrote a guide of advice to kings about how to effectively rule. Many rulers have successfully followed his advice. Others have not. While Richard the third was Machiavellian in some ways‚ many of the things he did Machiavelli would not have condoned of. This is especially the case with regards to his attempts to win the people’s goodwill. Richard the Third had not done this and ultimately paid the price. Richard the Third was not a Machiavellian king. On the surface‚ Richard may appear
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Florence
Throughout the course of history princes can see the struggle of a ruler to have the balance of good and evil. I used excerpts 1 to 4‚ to illustrate Machiavelli purposes to his audiences which are the princes must have a necessary standards to be a ruler. Machiavelli depended on descriptive adjective‚ visual imagery‚ figurative language and insightful thinking to argue his purpose to his audiences that a prince must have balance of good and evil to be a ruler. Machiavelli begin his argument
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Florence
Let me start with the first anthropological extreme according to which man is necessarily a sinful being and cannot be by nature good. This extreme can be found in the works of Machiavelli and Schmitt. Machiavelli’s The Prince is known as a significant elaboration of rather cynical political strategies and tactics that the rulers should adopt. But Machiavelli’s focus on the figure of prince is grounded in a certain anthropology. Basically‚ it is this negative anthropology that Schmitt mentioned
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Cesare Borgia
1. Liberality is not always bad and parsimony is not always good; thus‚ the statement provided is false. Machiavelli discusses how liberality must be done to be seen by others in order that the prince is recognized for giving. Yet‚ it is best to practice liberality with another’s money or to practice it by using your own money for campaigns and for defense of your nation. He claims that when using your funds for those purposes‚ it is best when it is due to parsimony to show the people you were prepared
Premium Political philosophy Liberalism The Prince
Although Socrates would not agree with Machiavelli in The Prince‚ he would be able to find some aspects that he would view as being practical in establishing a just political regime‚ such as having an autocratic leader in charge that knows what is best for the people‚ as well as being loved by the people. Socrates would find Machiavelli’s belief that the ruler of a society should have an elevated wisdom that most citizens do not possess to be beneficial to creating a just government. He would also
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Florence
Selfness is a virtue of humanity and generosity is an offshot of selfness. It is the virtue of bringing a smile onto other peoples faces. For the most part‚ it is good to be generous. In the Prince‚ Machiavelli argues that there are boundaries on when and to what extend a prince should be generous before his people take advantage of him or are no longer satisfied with his generosity and expect more from him. Through his text and my understanding of Machiavelli perspective on generosity you will be
Premium Pope Julius II Pope Political philosophy
Machiavelli made many important statements in his work‚ The Prince. One of the most controversial is: “A man who wishes to make a vocation of being good at all times will come to ruin among so many who are not good.” (Par. 7). There is some truth to that statement because when we take it to our perspective‚ it seems as if people that do not do good‚ always manage to obtain what they want. There is a well-known saying that says “nice guys finish last”. This saying is somewhat equivalent to a modern
Premium Truth Political philosophy The Prince
The Prince vs. Henry V A comparison of attributes After reading Machiavelli’s The Prince and watching Shakespeare’s Henry V in class‚ one begins to notice similarities between the authors’ idea of what a “perfect king” should be. The patterns between the ideal ruler of Shakespeare and the ideal ruler of Machiavelli can be seen in numerous instances throughout this story. For the duration of this essay‚ I will compare the similarities in both pieces to give the reader a better understanding
Premium Machiavellianism The Prince Cesare Borgia
Machiavelli wrote The Prince as an instructional manual for a Renaissance ruler. The Prince is a mixture of practical‚ “real” advice and theoretical‚ “ideal” advice for the ruler operating under the best conditions. If you were about to become the ruler of your own country‚ which parts of Machiavelli’s advice do you think would still apply in the modern world? In your answer‚ explain and justify what advice you would personally keep and what you would disregard as a neophyte ruler. Niccolo
Premium Florence Cesare Borgia Political philosophy