the members as separate legal persons as decided in the case Salomon v Salomon. - However‚ in certain circumstances‚ a court may ignore the separate legal entity of a company (lifting the corporate veil) and look at the members of the company and make them liable. - The relevant rule here is the use of company to evade legal obligation to commit fraud under the case law or judicial exceptions and the relevant case is Jones v Lipman. (3/4
Premium Legal person Person Corporations law
Thursday‚ 17 April‚ 2014 at 19:33 BST Client ID: Athens Content Type Westlaw UK Title : Thompson v Foy Delivery selection: Current Document Number of documents delivered: 1 Sweet & Maxwell is part of Thomson Reuters. © 2014 Thomson Reuters (Professional) UK Limited Page 1 Mrs Marion Mary Thompson v Mrs Julie Ann Foy The Mortgage Business v Mrs Julie Ann Foy‚ Mrs Marion Thompson Case Nos: 7BM305000‚ 7PC06111 High Court of Justice Chancery Division Birmingham
Premium Doctor
Mcculloh v Maryland Case In many ways‚ the opinion in this case represents a final step in the creation of the federal government. The argument involved which was the power of Congress to charter a bank. The larger questions would go out to the Constitutional interpretation and would still be debated to this day. In 1791‚ as part of his financial plan‚ Secretary of The Treasury Alexander Hamilton proposed that Congress charter a Bank of the United States‚ to serve as a central bank of the country
Premium United States Constitution Thomas Jefferson United States
They want to exploit the land * NOT assessable Scottish Australian Mining Co Ltd V FCT * 3rd mining company * After full use of the land‚ they subdivided and sold it * No intention to make a profit by reselling it * This is considered to be a process of realizing capital because the land can no longer be used FCT v Whitfords Beach Pty Ltd- the fishing shack * The case was very similar to Scottish Mining BUT! They transformed from a
Premium Economics Management Business
Pierson v. Post Deciding Court: Supreme Court of New York Parties: Pierson v. Post Procedural History: Appellate Court ruled in favor of Post Facts: Post was in pursuit of a fox on a beach with his dogs and hound. Pierson having well known the fox was being chased by Post and his hounds‚ caught up to the fox‚ caught it‚ killed it‚ and carried it off. Post is defendant even though he was the one in original pursuit. Post first sued Pierson but Pierson appealed when the court ruled in Post’s
Free Law Property Appeal
An individual possesses culpable knowledge only if he knows or strongly suspects the results of his actions will cause harm to another. Balachova v. Mukasey‚ 547 F. 3d at 379. In Balachova v. Mukasey‚ the alien was in the military and aided his fellow soldiers in rounding up several young women from a village and placing them in transport vehicles. Id. He physically placed the young girls‚ against their will in the vehicles‚ the military unit proceeded to take the girls to a different location where
Premium Law Legal terms United States
V For Vendetta – Great Film but C For Confusing… When I first saw the movie ‘V for Vendetta’ (2006 James McTeigue) I didn’t know anything about it at all. Despite the very complex and confusing story line though‚ it was a very enjoyable and engrossing film. This Sci-Fi Action film is set in the near future in London and is about a terrorist‚ V (Hugo Weaving)‚ who with the help of his friend Evey (Natalie Portman) plans to blow up Parliament‚ just like his hero‚ Guy Fawkes. V has many similarities
Premium V for Vendetta England
I was lying down on my deathbed‚ surrounded by my family‚ I told them that I wanted to tell a story‚ a story that I wanted them to know about. I Timothy the V was born into a family of poverty in the year 1657. As a young lad I grew up very poor‚ we never had much as you can imagine‚ but much is better than nothing. My mum and dad couldn’t afford to send me to school so every single day me and my dad will go to work at the mines. The little money that we managed to gather we were barely able to buy
Premium
The feature film V for Vendetta challenges values and attitudes of the mainstream population of the western world. The key concept behind the feature film is the act of terrorism; the justification of whether proactive violence. V is a terrorist. He blows up populated buildings‚ undoubtedly killing dozens if not hundreds of civilians. He refuses to accept anyone else’s point of view; he fanatically believes his view is the only way to see things. He murders‚ not just cold-bloodedly‚ but also deliberately
Premium V for Vendetta Totalitarianism English-language films
Name: |Date: | |Graded Assignment Korematsu v. the United States (1944) Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions. (2 points) |Score | | | 1. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction? Answer: (2 points) |Score | | | 2. According to the first paragraph from the excerpts
Premium United States