"12 Angry Men" occur in New York City in 1957 and focuses on a jury’s deliberations in a capital murder case. The jury has 12 men and is sent to begin deliberations in the firstdegree murder trial of a young man who is 18year old accused of stabbing his father who died because of it. If someone is found guilty it means death sentence. The case appears to be “openandshut”. The defendant has a weak alibi; the knife he claimed to have “lost” is found at the scene where the stabbing occur. Several
Premium Jury Man Boy
The 1957 film Twelve Angry Men is a dramatic portrayal of what happens in a jury room after a murder trial in which the defendant is a young minority man who has allegedly killed his father with a switchblade knife. Eleven of the jurors are ready to declare a guilty verdict in the first five minutes‚ but one juror performs the Central Negative role in the group in order to save them from groupthink and also save the defendant from execution. Through this movie we would try to understand how individual
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
Declaration of Human Rights‚ "Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal‚ in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him." The American Film 12 Angry Men clearly demonstrates that even in a place where individuals are required by law to step outside of societal norms‚ cultural and social behavior patterns are so deeply planted into the mind that people often operate fully without being aware of
Premium Sociology
12 Angry Men is a film that plays on the psychological mind‚ and highlights many features of Organizational Behavior. As the jury of 12 men convene in a locked room to decide the future‚ or lack thereof‚ of a young boy accused of murdering his father‚ they illustrate movement through the four stages of Bruce Tuckman’s Group Development Model of Forming‚ Storming‚ Norming and Performing. Along with this model‚ the movie portrays the difficulties and cohesiveness that 12 different men experience
Premium Jury Verdict
12 Angry Men is a story of twelve jurors responsible for deliberating and deciding the fate of a teenage boy accused of murdering his father. Although it seems to the jurors that the boy is unquestionably guilty‚ one juror (Juror 8) speaks out against the comfortable groupthink of the other jurors. Juror 8‚ Henry Fonda‚ approaches the issue from a teamwork point of view‚ and over and over again gains acceptance his views as he calmly and realistically discusses what he believed are inconsistencies
Premium Jury Decision theory Decision making
Monday April 9th‚ 2007 Criminal Justice Twelve Angry Men During the course of our class we have encountered plenty of important topics and vital information that is essential to the field of the Criminal Justice system. Such as; Crime and justice including laws‚ Victimization and Criminal behavior‚ Laws‚ Police officers and Law enforcement and the criminal justice system in itself. These topics are daily situations yet individuals are oblivious to what’s going on and that in it can be a major
Premium Jury Crime Law
In 12 Angry Men juror number eight did many things could be considered heroic. The two main things that he did was standing up against the group and speaking out‚ also he was able to step back and not look and the fact that it was a black tennager who lived in the slums committing the crime. First off‚ juror number eight showed heroism by standing up against the group. The facts were laid out and by just glancing at them like the other jurors did a guilty verdict would have been decided. But
Premium Jury Not proven Law
Gus Jackson October 28‚ 2010 12 Angry Men 5. There just seems to be a general lack of relevant background information in this case. There are only the two witnesses‚ and even their stories have some doubt surrounding them. Furthermore‚ none of the jurors (as far as we know) have any significant background in dealing with these matters. It is revealed that Ed Begley has a prejudice that seems to be affecting his judgment in the case. During an exchange with one of the other jurors‚ Begley says
Premium Logic Fallacy Critical thinking
Grace Chavez Response to Twelve Angry Men 11-4-2013 Twelve Angry Men Twelve angry men is a movie which takes place in a New York jury chamber on one of the hottest days in the year during the deliberation faze. Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) is the only juror out of the twelve who believes that the case they are deciding on should not be open and shut he wants to talk and point out facts of the case. The twelve men in the case must decide on this young boy’s fate‚ who is on trial for the murder of
Premium Jury Court
In the movie “12 Angry Men” all five methods of influence were used. The Methods of influence such as use of reason‚ assertiveness‚ coalition building‚ higher values‚ and bargaining were all used by the jurors; whether it was purposely or subconsciously. The influential methods used by juror number eight were the most effective for many reasons. Jurors number three‚ the messenger service owner‚ and number ten‚ the garage owner tried to use the assertiveness method of influence to get their points
Premium Film Film director Actor