Weber on Legitimate Norms and Authority Author(s): Martin E. Spencer Source: The British Journal of Sociology‚ Vol. 21‚ No. 2 (Jun.‚ 1970)‚ pp. 123-134 Published by: Wiley on behalf of The London School of Economics and Political Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/588403 . Accessed: 21/11/2014 14:18 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use‚ available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit
Premium Max Weber Authority Charismatic authority
Marx vs. Weber in today’s society Marx and Weber have not lived within the same social conditions we are facing today‚ and one question that may arise is‚ whose approach to social class and inequality is more compatible with today’s society? Taking a closer look at Weber’s analogy‚ and the concept of “life chances”‚ one may attempt to conclude that his approach is more flexible and fitting in today’s society. Weber offers a micro level analysis of inequality at the individual’s level‚ which makes
Free Sociology Marxism Max Weber
Weber destabilizes the relationship between base and superstructure that Marx had established. According to Weber‚ the concept of historical materialism is naïve and nonsense because superstructures are not mere reflections of the economic base. ("The Protestant Ethic" and "The Spirit of Capitalism (1904-5) Weber agrees that the economy is one of the most faithful forces in modern life. However there are other social and legal factors which exhibit power and thus influence society. These factors
Premium Capitalism Karl Marx Marxism
three main sociologist writers Karl Marx‚ Max Weber and Emile Durkheim offer different perspectives on religion and how important it is to society. Some of the theorists chose to have a positive view whilst others argue the unimportance of religion. This essay attempts to discover which theorist has the most accurate perspective of religion in modern times. This is done by firstly explaining the basic ideas regarding to religion put forward by Marx‚ Weber and Durkheim. Then both Marx’s and Durkheim’s
Premium Sociology Karl Marx Religion
During the nineteenth century‚ Karl Marx and Max Weber were two of the most influential sociologist. Both their views on the rise of capitalism have various similarities and differences. They believe that capitalism is relatively new to the modern world. Their views differ on the rise of capitalism. Regardless of Marx and Weber ’s differences‚ both theorists agree that capitalism is a system of highly impersonal relations. Karl Marx was born on May 5‚ 1818 to the father of a Jewish lawyer. As a
Premium Marxism Karl Marx Max Weber
(Johnson‚ 1971:210). From this we gather that versehen was Weber’s way of understanding social action. For weber social action was an action which an individual undertakes and carries out to which a person attached a meaning (Haralambos & Holborn‚ 2004:953). Weber identifies two types of understanding‚ aktuelles verstehen and erklarendes verstehen (Haralambos & Holborn‚ 2004:953). According to Weber‚ versehen is an empirical sociology of the understanding of meaning (Kalse1979:176). Aktuelles vestehen
Free Sociology Max Weber
Max Weber was a German scholar and sociologist. He provided a methodology in the expansion of classical administration theory. Weber’s main focus was comprehension of rationalization processes‚ disenchantment and secularization that he linked with the increase of modernity and capitalism. He wrote expansively on bureaucracy and how it had an affect on organizational structure. Weber’s concern in the mode of authority and power‚ and his prevalent interest in contemporary rationalization trends‚ made
Premium Max Weber Authority
Karl Marx v. Max Weber: Comparitive Analysis C. Wright Mills places both Weber and Marx in the great tradition of what he calls the "sociological imagination" a quality that "enables us to grasp both history biography and the relationship between the two within society". (Mills‚ 12) In other words both theorists were dealing with the individual and society not either one to the exclusion of the other. Mills further writes that both Marx and Weber are in that tradition of sociological theorizing
Premium Sociology Karl Marx Max Weber
Management Question 2: (A) Describe Max Weber‘s understanding of bureaucracy. (A) The term bureaucracy was used from Weber studies published in 1947. It described a rational form of organisation that today exists to some extent in practically every organisation whether it is public or private. Max Weber theory and philosophy is largely focused on the idea of bureaucracy as an efficient method for organizing and prioritizing the routine tasks of business. Max Weber‘s studies in organizations
Premium Max Weber Charismatic authority Authority
4 implications of Weber’s bureaucracy in today’s business organizations Weber’s bureaucracy was described as being an organization with a system of rules‚ impersonality‚ hierarchy of authority and specialization. In today’s society we can see the influence e of Weber’s bureaucracy on business organizations. 1. Specialization- In many organizations today there is specialization. In banks officers specialize in different jobs and are in different departments such as loans or being a clerk. In most
Premium Management Teacher Government