of charisma‚ but we could describe some people as a charismatic person who have an extraordinary ability to inspire‚ influence‚ and draw other’s attention. Charisma is usually associated with leaders who have a power and high positions‚ but it could be a characteristic of actors‚ public speakers‚ mathematicians‚ scientists‚ singers‚ or any other people. Charisma indicate a positive meaning; however‚ it could has it own dark side. Some leaders how have charisma causes huge damage to the world in
Premium Psychology Emotion Fascism
sides of organized religion comes from the idea of “charisma” and the charismatic leader who may not have the best intentions and could use the power that they gain over people with this charisma to push things that may not necessarily by what their religion is supposed to stand for (Fisher‚ 2005). An example of this would be the extremist Muslims in the Middle East‚ specifically al Qaida or the Taliban. Charismatic leaders‚ such as the recently killed Osama bin Laden‚ have used the charisma
Premium Religion Charismatic authority Sociology
CHAPTER 3 Charismatic and Transformational Leadership The purpose of this chapter is to help the reader understand the nature of charismatic and transformational leadership. Although the two forms of leadership overlap‚ they are treated separately here because the study of charismatic leadership focuses so heavily on personal traits. The legitimacy of either of these forms of leadership as a separate entity has been challenged. Nevertheless‚ studying charismatic and transformational leadership
Premium Leadership Charismatic authority Charisma
organizational objectives‚ ultimately affecting their task performances and organizational citizenship. Type of power that I have Charismatic power is what would best describe my type of power. I believe that I show self-confidence‚ I show complete confidence in my judgment and ability‚ as well as vision‚ ideas and goals. Another trait that has been found in charismatic power is someone who is willing to take high risks and engage in self-sacrifice to achieve their vision‚ behavior out of the ordinary
Premium Charismatic authority Leadership Charisma
of which need to paid for. • Alternatively authority is simply defined as legitimate power. It is a socially recognized agreement process between a superordinate (i.e.‚ the administrator or leader) and a subordinate (i.e.‚ the employee or follower) that articulates a range of activities over which the leader can tell specific followers what to do. Its appeal lies in that it requires neither observation nor enforcement‚ and therefore is much more efficient and reliable. 2. Weber distinguishes
Free Max Weber Sociology Authority
Weber on Legitimate Norms and Authority Author(s): Martin E. Spencer Source: The British Journal of Sociology‚ Vol. 21‚ No. 2 (Jun.‚ 1970)‚ pp. 123-134 Published by: Wiley on behalf of The London School of Economics and Political Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/588403 . Accessed: 21/11/2014 14:18 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use‚ available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit
Premium Max Weber Authority Charismatic authority
theories and discuss their salient features. Task for P3: In this task you have to describe different approaches to management with their merits and demerits. Task for M: Think about anyone who you consider charismatic leader or a transformational leader or a transformational leader and state the differences and characteristics which make them special also what he or she has done that suggests that he or she is so special General Criteria for Merit and Distinction Proper formatting of the
Premium Leadership Management Organization
claims there are three ideal-types of basis for legitimate authority: rational/legal‚ traditional‚ and charismatic. Rational/legal is legal authority that comes from rules such as police officers‚ senators‚ etc. Traditional is authority that comes from traditions and the belief in the sanctity of “the way it has been done before” such as priests‚ queens‚ etc. The final type of power is charismatic which is power that is based on the exceptional character of an individual such as Martin Luther King
Premium Authority Max Weber Charismatic authority
Transformational leaders have a strong vision to reshape the future by creating new realities. They have four main characteristics; they are charismatic‚ they use inspirational motivation (they come with a vision that is inspiring to others)‚ they use intellectual stimulation (they encourage subordinates to work harder and think creatively) and they have individual consideration (they care and have concern for the well-being of their subordinates) (Mihiotis‚ 2005). Transformational leaders transform their
Premium Leadership Apple Inc. Steve Jobs
science. But‚ nowadays‚ most of the human societies are democratic. The denizens themselves have the right to choose their leader. A nation‚ these days‚ no longer reminds us of its ruler. Rather it reminds us of the people who hail from that nation. So‚ the question pertinently arises “How is a nation classified as great?” Is it by the virtue of the achievements of its leaders or other eminent personalities in the fields of arts‚ science and technology or by the general welfare of its natives? The
Premium Mughal Empire Society