Time Toymaker (BTT) and Chou‚ I have found that there were two different contracts in place. In the text it describes a contract as “a promise or set of promises enforceable by law” (Melvin‚ 2014)‚ these contracts can be oral or written. The first contract in place is a bilateral contract‚ this contract is clearly defined in the practice theory when Big Time Toymakers offers Chou $25‚000 in exchange for “exclusive negation for a 90-day period" (Melvin‚ 2014‚ p.155) to which Chou accepted. The second
Premium Contract Contract law Common law
on the future. And performance related promotion is enough to minority ethnic`s motivation for all about firm`s policy‚ so I`m confident this policies improved firm`s hiring strategy. 2. Do you foresee any problems with the changes that chuang instituted? Explain. If hiring strategy is change‚ some problems remained after changing strategy‚ For example‚ if black person is promoted high level of manager‚ he or she help more same ethnic group of people‚ this case is problem of hiring strategy
Premium Affirmative action United Kingdom Ethnic group
contract? Answer: Big Time Toymaker and Chou had an oral contract. In a meeting that included Big Time Toymaker and Chou an agreement was reached. Additionally‚ an e-mail was sent by Big Time Toymaker to Chou that confirmed the terms of the agreement that were discussed during the meeting. Question 2 What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? Answer: There are three facts that are in favor of Chou. The first fact is‚ three days prior
Premium Contract Communication
University of Macau BBEL 230 –Business Law I Macau‚ 28 March 2010 MID-TERM EXAM (Part I) |Write your full identification‚ Western name and section. | |Only the legislation‚ without any forbidden notes‚ can be used. | |Dictionaries are allowed.
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance Gentlemen's agreement
Big Time Toymaker Jennifer Ferrante LAW/421 – Contemporary Business Law Date August 18‚ 2013 Instructor Name Jane Schneider Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker In week four’s theory practice‚ we reviewed the case scenario of Big Time Toymaker vs Chou in regards to determining the validity of a contract. As we’ve reviewed‚ an agreement or mutual assent is of course essential to a valid contract but the law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of his words and
Premium
of the Taoist texts. For every early Taoist book‚ including the Chuang Tzu and the Lao Tzu‚ is in fact an anthology of work by many writers. That the Chuang Tzu is a compilation has long been generally agreed‚ but to deny that the Lao Tzu is homogeneous is still widely decried as heresy. Nevertheless a growing body of scholarship supports‚ with careful and impressive documentation‚ the statement of Fung Yu-lan that both the Chuang
Premium Taoism Chinese philosophy Tao Te Ching
Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker LAW/421 Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker At what point‚ if ever‚ did the parties have a contract? Chou and BTT reach the point of having a contract when they agree to all terms. In the email send by BTT covering the obligations of the parties and the terms of the agreement‚ BTT showed objective intent. According to Melvin‚” Objective intent Requirement for an offer to have legal effect necessitating that generally‚ the offer or must have a serious intention to become
Premium Contract Common law Contract law
electrical engineer Stephen Chou and colleagues made an array of tiny holes in a thin metal film‚ then blocked each hole with an opaque metal cap. When they shined light into the holes‚ they found that as much as 70 percent more light came through when the holes were blocked than when they were open. "The common wisdom in optics is that if you have a metal film with very small holes and you plug the holes with metal‚ the light transmission is blocked completely‚" said Chou‚ the Joseph Elgin Professor
Premium Light
Toymaker and Chou did partake in an oral contract. During the meeting both parties reached an oral distribution agreement‚ and a confirmation of the terms of the agreement was sent by e-mail. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? The facts in favor of Chou would oral agreement and email he received from Big Time Toymaker. The facts against Chou would be that there was never an actual written agreement drafted by Chou or the fact
Premium Contract
playing a “golden –fretted harp and as she plays through the frets of the notes‚ I imagined Chou You a young and a handsome rich lad which she likes‚ enters the room she is in‚ and to be noticed by this young man she decides to think of a way to attract the eyes of the young Chou Yu‚ so she decides to use the obvious‚ which is to attract him by playing wrong notes now and then‚ and by doing I visualize Chou Yu falling in love in with the beautiful white harp player. Being ignorant or knowledgeable
Premium Girl Love Boy