With reference to the source and other sources‚ discuss how this interpretation of history compares with your own view. Answer: The Problem of historical objectivity is the fact that history was and will always stay subjective as long as historians have different moral values and beliefs. Historical objectivity challenges historical construction and the way historians find evidence to reconstruct the past. The differing perspectives towards how history is interpreted are expressed through the
Free History Historiography
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ACC 290 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) originated on July 29‚ 2002 due to fraudulent bookkeeping practices and misleading financial reports from large corporations. These practices created a number of accounting scandals‚ which resulted in this in the government creating such an act. The purpose was to prevent and punish corporate corruption and‚ along the way‚ try to repair investor confidence. The law was passed by congress after well-known
Premium Enron
Unit 4 Assignment Abstract In this assignment I will be looking at what Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is and why it came to be. How SOX has affected the accounting and auditing industry and what the benefits and costs are and what changes have happened or should happen moving into the future with SOX. Unit 4 Assignment A family man has invested a portion of his retirement into a growing stock
Premium Audit Internal control Auditing
essay I will be critically reviewing Heywood‚ Andrew. 2002. What is a nation? In Politics. London: Macmillan: 106-11. I am arguing that Heywoods views the nation as a psycho political construct. He argues that the nation is made up of subjective and objective factors. While he acknowledges the objective factors which are cultural characteristics he states that “ultimately‚ nations can only be defined subjectively by its members.” Heywood (2002‚ 106) Heywood identifies that the term “Nation” is made
Free Nation Nationalism Ethnic group
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Student ACC/561 June 8‚ 2015 Professor Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Introduction The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was established after many corporate scandals such as Enron‚ WorldCom‚ and AIG cost investors billions of dollars. Financial fallout from these scandals reduced the American public ’s trust in the economy. The enactment of SOX in 2002 holds corporations to higher standards in reporting financial statements to internal and external users. Even though the
Premium Corporate governance Sarbanes–Oxley Act Enron
Article Review The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ARTICLE SYNOPSIS In response to the Enron and WorldCom scandals‚ the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in July 30‚ 2002. This provides a comprehensive power that modifies the compliance of how companies would need to report their financials to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The law’s purpose is to solve precise mechanism failures in accounting approaches and requires greater levels of fiduciary responsibilities especially for those
Premium Corporate governance Enron Sarbanes–Oxley Act
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act‚ Pub.L. 107-204‚ July 30‚ 2002‚ 116 Stat. 745‚ July 30‚ 2002) was enacted by Congress in the wake of corporate and accounting scandals that led to bankruptcies‚ severe stock losses‚ and a loss of confidence in the Stock Market. The act imposes new responsibilities on corporate management and criminal sanctions on those managers who flout the law. It makes Securities fraud a serious federal crime and also
Premium Corporate governance Enron Internal control
high level executives‚ the imposition of very small fines and no prison time for devastating frauds‚ and a lack of independence of external auditors and the board of directors. With this in mind‚ I believe five advantages of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to be: 1. That it holds CEO’s accountable for internal controls so that they cannot claim that they did not know or understand what was happening in their company and place the responsibility for fraud on lower level staff (Section 302 and 404). 2
Premium Corporate governance Sarbanes–Oxley Act Internal control
corporations such as Enron‚ WorldCom‚ and Hollinger International‚ lawmakers sought to provide regulations that provide oversight on the way corporations report financial data and to ensure that stockholders were protected. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was put in place to combat deceit‚ improve the consistency of financial reporting‚ and reestablish the confidence of investors (Wagner & Dittmar‚ 2006). One of the declaring regulation within this major law is that the management of a company is
Premium Ethics Enron Morality
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 established a new five-person board to oversee financial accounting in publicly traded corporations. The board is appointed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Prior to the creation of this board the industry relied primarily on self-regulation through the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Do you think the establishment of the new oversight board was a good idea or should the profession have continued to be self-regulated? In 2002 there was a new act
Premium Corporate governance Internal control Auditing