After a 3 year fight in arbitrary courts‚ the Astro versus Lippo Group reaches it’s final stretch for the finish line. A long running legal battle was sought between Astro‚ a international satellite television network company owned by Malaysia big shot Ananda Krishnan and First Media‚ a brand of multifarious owned Lippo Group led by James Riady when the latter failed to pay the USD$250 million to the Malaysian based Company despite by court order on July 2012‚ by High Court Judge Belinda Ang which
Premium Judge Singapore The Straits Times
Morrissey v. Brewer Morrissey v. Brewer accrued in 1972 and was marked the beginning of the United States supreme court involvement with parole revocation procedures. The problem with this certain case was whether the due process clauses of the Fourth Amendment required that a state give a person the chance to be heard before canceling their parole. This happened when Morrissey was charged with false drawing of checks in 1967 in Iowa. After he pled guilty‚ he was sentenced seven years in prison
Premium Crime Prison Police
Cassie versus Kelsang Cassie: "I was also told directly that...our normal ’2015 Summer Camp’ and normal ’2016 winter camp’ will be impossible to arrange this year...TNSA began to block the activities of the program." Kelsang: " I told her‚ Kalachakra Initiation and Tibetan New Year coincide with the said camps. Players may want to take parts the events and spend time with their families. I didn’t block them from playing. Evidence is‚ their first ever match was played as an exhibition match during
Premium Tibet
I. Bowers v. Hardwick II. Citations 478 U.S. 186 (1986) III. Facts: Michael Hardwick was observed by a Georgia police officer while conducting in the act of consensual homosexual sodomy with another man at his home. Hardwick was arrested and charged with violating the Georgia statute of committing sodomy in the bedroom of his home. The district attorney‚ Lewis Slaton decided not to prosecute Hardwick or his partner‚ but Hardwick filed suit in the federal district court against the police and Georgia’s
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
Jackson V Indiana‚ 435 U.S. 975‚ 98 S. Ct. 1623‚ 56 L. Ed. 2d 69 (1978) Facts: Mr. Jackson‚ the Appellate‚ was a mentally deficient deaf. He wasn’t able to read‚ write or communicate. The Appellate was charged with robbery of two different women. Appellant robbed the women for four and five dollars respectively. Appellant was found to be incompetent to stand trial at an incompetency hearing. The Court ordered Appellant to be committed until he was competent to stand trial. Issue: Was the Appellant’s
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law Court
Ring v. Arizona 122 S Ct 2428 (2002) Facts of the case: On November 28‚ 1994‚ The body of an armored van driver was found dead inside the vehicle. Also‚ there was more than $800‚000 missing from the van leading police to believe that this was a robbery and homicide case. There were no witnesses to the crime except a local bystander who stated that two vehicles‚ a van and a red truck were speeding down the road earlier that day and had neglected to stop at the intersection where there is a stop
Premium English-language films Police Transportation
PRO (yes) CON (no) The American Civil Liberties Union stated in its 1996 amicus brief in Vacco v. Quill that: "The right of a competent‚ terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. The exercise of this right is as central to personal autonomy and bodily integrity as rights safeguarded by this Court’s decisions relating to marriage‚ family relationships‚ procreation‚ contraception
Premium Death United States Law
CITATION: Heath v. Alabama‚ 472 U.S. 82 (1985). PARTIES: Petitioner = Larry Gene Heath Respondent = Alabama FAC TS: The petitioner‚ a resident of Russel County‚ Alabama hired Charles Owens and Gregory Lumpkin to kill his wife‚ Rebecca McGuire Heath‚ for $2‚000. Mr. Heath left his residence in Alabama to meet Mr. Owens and Mr. Lumpkin in Georgia‚ just across the Alabama state line. Mr. Heath led the two men back to his residence in Alabama‚ gave them the keys to his car and
Premium Law United States Appeal
Contents List of contributors Preface Acknowledgments i Introduction: inferences from verbal material Charles P. Smith page ix xiii xv PART I. GENERAL ISSUES 2 Motivational determinants of thematic apperception John W. Atkinson 3 How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? David C. McClelland‚ Richard Koestner‚ and Joel Weinberger 4 Thematic analysis‚ experience sampling‚ and personal goals Robert A. Emmons and Laura A. King 5 Motivational configurations David C. McClelland
Premium Scientific method Psychology UCI race classifications
|For Project 6‚ complete Research Case 31 on page 458‚ Chapter 13. | | | | | |
Premium English-language films Interpersonal relationship Psychology