Brown v. Texas‚ 443 U.S. 47 (1979)Brief Petitioner: Brown Respondent: Texas FACTS Two police officers‚ while cruising near noon in a patrol car‚ observed appellant and another man walking away from one another in an alley in an area with a high incidence of drug traffic. They stopped and asked appellant to identify himself and explain what he was doing. One officer testified that he stopped appellant because the situation "looked suspicious‚ and we had never seen that subject in
Premium Police Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Evaluation of two Web sites Factors influencing student’s choice of websites for comparison in relation to their personal or other interests (100 words) John Lewis and Debenhams websites were chosen mostly because they are a retail organization which satisfies a wide range of the consumer’s personal and residential hard goods product needs; and at the same time offering the consumer a choice of multiple merchandise at variable price points‚ in all product categories. Basically‚ one has everything
Premium Online shopping Marketing Retailing
Ashley Bejarano Mr. Asper American Government Honors 21 October 2011 Edward V. South Carolina: Facts of Cause 1.Facts of case Edwards v. South Carolina (1963) was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government officials to force a crowd to disperse when they are otherwise legally marching in front of a state house. The 187 petitioners consisted of African-American high school and college
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States American Civil War
Jessica Yeganeh New Jersey v. T.L.O. 1985 Took place at Piscataway High School in New Jersey Supreme Court Justice Warren E. Burger Summary: In 1980‚ one of the teachers at Piscataway High School found two girls smoking in a restroom at the school Smoking in the restroom was in violation to the schools rules‚ there were designated smoking in the school but the restroom was not one of them. The teacher brought the two girls to the principles office The vice principle asked the two
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
Right to refuse treatment 2 In SELL v. UNITED STATES‚ the question was whether the constitution allows forcibly medicating a mentally ill defendant so that he/she can be competent for trial for serious crimes that are non-violent. The constitution does allow this but under certain circumstances. Sell was found to be mentally incompetent to stand trial after examination by a magistrate the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners. Sell decided to challenge the decision made by the
Premium United States United States Constitution Law
PSC 522 Regulatory Processes & Admin Law 09/27/2013 Goldberg V. Kelly Citation: 397 U.S. 254 (1970) Your paper will have three elements: Facts‚ Issues and Decisions. One page send to me via e-mail as an attachement 1. Describe the common legal issue raised in the court case assigned. 2. Describe the legal basis for the court arriving at seemingly different outcomes. 3. Justify the differing outcomes as the correct outcome in the case on the
Premium Law United States Supreme Court of the United States
In the first 7 chapters of Car Guys vs Bean Counters‚ it is easy to see why the production line and accounting/financing have disagreements regarding the primary purpose of the company. A considerably large reason for General Motors downfall seems to be the focus they had on the numbers they had to arrive at to generate a large profit. All GM was aiming to do was to do anything to maximize profits without a focus on the quality of the product. The issue of not keeping themselves grounded arose from
Premium Management Strategic management Marketing
Debbie White vs. Patrick Gibbs Agree with Defendants or Plaintiffs Ana Giron Liberty University The background of this lawsuit is based on Debbie White suing Patrick Gibbs and his Tavern for the death of her husband . The reason why Debbie wants the bar to be held responsible is due to the fact that Mr. Edward Hard left intoxicated and crashed into Mrs. White ’s car and killed her husband . The Gibbs feel his bar shouldn’t be held responsible due to the fact that the bartender didn’t
Premium Law Tort Appeal
Association for Molecular Pathology vs. Myriad Genetics The case of the Association for Molecular Pathology vs. Myriad Genetics was a case that challenged the validity of gene patents in the United States. It specifically challenged certain claims in issued patents owned or controlled by Myriad Genetics that cover isolated DNA sequences‚ methods to diagnose propensity to cancer by looking for mutated DNA sequences‚ and methods to identify drugs using isolated DNA sequences. Before this case occurred
Premium DNA Biology Genetics
circumstances. Although there is a brave man‚ who goes by the name of Mr. Faden‚ who used the loophole in the system in order to educate others in the most ironic way. This paper is discussing the court case of Mr. Faden’s remix “Fair(y) Use Tale” vs. Walt Disney. Mr. Faden’s remix is an educational video about the rules and laws of copyright and how it works‚ but the entire is told through clips of Disney movies. Walt Disney is claiming that Mr. Faden’s remix‚“Fair(y) Use Tale‚ is copyright
Premium