Page 1 ICLR: Chancery Division/1949/CANNON v. HARTLEY. - [1949] Ch. 213 [1949] Ch. 213 [CHANCERY DIVISION] CANNON v. HARTLEY. 1948 Nov. 19‚ 22. ROMRE J. Settlement - Deed of separation - Covenant to settle after-acquired property - Breach of covenant Volunteer’s right to claim for damages. A volunteer who is a party to a deed and a direct covenantee thereunder is entitled to damages for breach of a covenant contained in the deed. By a deed of separation made on January 23‚ 1941‚ between the defendant
Premium Marriage Trust law Husband
The case follows the work history of Bradley Ennis‚ from his recruitment to his termination. We are given the details of his employment‚ work performance and what led to his termination. Mr. Ennis was a nurse in the trauma unit of All Saints Hospital. When he was hired he met the minimum required standards for continued employment‚ included the Trauma Specialist certification‚ which he maintained throughout his time of employment. Due to the sudden death of his 5 year old daughter at the same hospital
Premium Management Civil procedure Law
Chapter 2 The Court System N.B.: TYPE indicates that a question is new‚ modified‚ or unchanged‚ as follows. N A question new to this edition of the Test Bank. + A question modified from the previous edition of the Test Bank. = A question included in the previous edition of the Test Bank. TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS 1. Laws would be meaningless without the courts to interpret and apply them. ANSWER: T PAGES: Section 1 TYPE: + BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal 2. The federal courts are superior
Premium Trial court Appeal Civil procedure
Shane Bruner Stephen Boston English 111 Sunday‚ October 5‚ 2008 Junk Lawsuits In America‚ we all have this thought in our heads that if there is a medical accident someone must pay for it. This way of life is destroying the America that we all love. Medical laws suits need to be regulated because they have caused the rise in healthcare costs‚ doctors being afraid to practice medicine‚ and the clogging of the court system. There are many expenses to the average American because of this
Premium Lawsuit Medicine Court
the freight to disembark from the truck while in transit. 11. It was the duty of the Defendant to ensure safe and proper loading‚ securing and inspection of cargo prior to transit. Defendant breached that duty of due care by failing to use proper procedures and failed to ensure safe conditions for the shipment of their
Premium United States Civil procedure Jury
Provincial Sheriff of Negros Occidental‚ (defendants) Margarita G. Saldajeno and her husband Cecilio Saldajeno‚ defendants-appellants. Nature: An appeal to the Court of Appeals from the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental in Civil Case no. 5343. Facts: * January 30‚ 1951 - the defendants entered into a Contract of Partnership under the firm name "Isabela Sawmill." * April 25‚ 1958 - an action to dissolve the partnership was filed by the spouses Cecilio Saldajeno against
Premium Plaintiff Appeal Negros Occidental
Silence does not amount to misrepresentation‚ how if‚ it is to a known defects? Discuss by using case law to support your answer. Misrepresentation is defined as a false statement of existing facts or laws‚ which materially induces the misled party to enter into the contract. This is a pre-contractual statement‚ which is not part of the contract. However‚ these non-contractual statements can be classified as mere puffs (sales talk) or misrepresentations. For a misrepresentation to be actionable
Premium Complaint Legal terms Misrepresentation
1. In about 100 words‚ explain why online businesses might have difficulty limiting the effects of their actions to a relatively small geographic area. * The legal concept of jurisdiction on the Internet is still unclear and ill defined. The relationship between geographic and legal boundaries is based on four elements: power‚ effects‚ legitimacy and notice. These elements have helped governments create the legal concept of jurisdiction in the physical world. Because the four elements exist
Premium United States Patent Law
Abstract In the case of White v. Gibbs‚ the plaintiff‚ Mrs. Debbie White‚ sued O’Malley’s Tavern alongside Patrick Gibbs. Gibbs served as bartender at the tavern during the night in question. Mrs. White seeks settlement under the state of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act. Under the Dram Shop Act‚ a bartender assumes liability to any persons injured who were served alcohol while exhibiting obvious signs of intoxication (Todd‚ 1986). Since the two parties reside in different states‚ the case was brought to
Premium Civil procedure Plaintiff United States
“Conflict Between Law and Morality” * Aakriti Pandey Student of RMLNLU‚ Lucknow Introduction In ancient times there was no distinction between law & morals. The Hindu jurist in ancient India did not make any distinction between law & morals. However‚ later on‚ some distinction came to be made in actual practice. The Mimansa made a distinction between obligatory and recommendatory rules. By the time the commentaries were written‚ the distinction was clearly established in theory also
Free Law Morality Appeal