In the Court of Joint District‚ 2nd Court‚ Dhaka Suit No……../2014 Faizuddin Son Of: Hazi Abdul Aziz Village:Amin Bazar P.S: Savar District-Dhaka
Premium Plaintiff Complaint Defendant
Citation: Olympic Airways v. Rubina Husain Supreme Court of the United States‚ 2004 470 U. S.‚ at 406 470 U. S.‚ at 404 Summarize: In December 1997‚ Dr. Abid Hanson and his wife‚ Rubina Husain (hereinafter respondent)‚ traveled with their children and another family from San Francisco to Athens and Cairo for a family vacation. During a stopover in New York‚ Dr. Hanson learned for the first time that petitioner allowed its passengers to smoke on international flights. Because
Premium United States Law Appeal
Hildreth v. Tidewater Equipment Co. Summary John Hildreth was the sole shareholder‚ director‚ and officer HCE‚ Inc‚ a corporation in New Jersey. HCE-NJ began to do business in Maryland in early 1997. According to the Maryland code‚ it is required for foreign corporations to register with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation before doing intrastate business in Maryland‚ and it is required to have a resident agent in Maryland. In February 1998‚ HCE-NJ rented equipment from Tidewater
Premium Corporation United States Virginia
Case Two Plaintiff: Jane Chambers (Prosecution) Defendant: Giorgio’s Grill (Defense) SUMMARY Jane Chambers‚ filed a personal injury action alleging negligence by the defendant‚ Giorgio’s Grill. She alleges that she slipped and fell on a wet napkin‚ breaking her leg. The defendant denied any negligence. Giorgio’s was a restaurant which became a night club after certain hours. It had a tradition of both the wait staff and customers throwing paper napkins into the air as the music
Premium Tort Civil procedure Plaintiff
Shepardizing Shawn Shryer PA201: Introduction to Legal Research 5/16/2011 566 A.2d 227: 1. What is the parallel citation for this case (i.e.‚ the same case printed elsewhere)? | 236 N.J. Super. 473‚ *; 566 A.2d 227‚ **; 1989 N.J. Super. LEXIS 385‚ *** 2. How many cases give a positive treatment of the case‚ and how can you tell? 7 cases had a positive treatment. I know this from the symbol next to the citation. 29 N.W. 425: 1. What is the parallel citation? 69 Iowa
Premium Jury United States Appeal
SANDRA MITCHELL‚ PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT VS. FRIDAYS‚ ET AL.‚ DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES CASE NO. 99-CA-201 Case Briefing 1. Parties: Identify the plaintiff and the defendant. a. SANDRA MITCHELL‚ PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT b. FRIDAYS‚ ET AL.‚ DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES 2. Facts: Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case. a. On April 11‚ 1996‚ Appellant Sandra Mitchell was having dinner at Appellee Friday’s restaurant. Appellant was eating a fried clam strip when she bit into a hard substance
Premium Appeal Law Civil procedure
Alternative Dispute Resolution The case selected is a construction defect case‚ Haynes v. Adair Homes‚ Inc. The case was lastly filed in the Court of Appeals of The State of Oregon. Hynes v. Adair Homes was initially filed in the Clackamas County Circuit Court. The plaintiffs Paul and Renee Haynes contracted with the defendant Adair Homes‚ Inc. for the construction of their home. After completion of the house‚ they discovered extensive water in the underfloor crawlspace. Ponding water in the crawlspace
Premium Appeal United States Law
Andrea Lazalde Professor Mendiola Legal Environment of Business October 21‚ 2014 Court of Appeals of Texas‚ Houston (1st Dist.) MERRY HOMES‚ INC.‚ Appellant v. CHI HUNG LUU‚ Appellee. ISSUE: Chi Hung Luu‚ appellee‚ leased premises in Houston Texas‚ from Merry Homes‚ Inc.‚ with the intention of opening a bar or nightclub on the property. After Luu signed the lease‚ he submitted an application for a liquor license to the city of Houston. The city denied the application
Premium Law United States Civil procedure
And Now‚ The Rest Of The Story . . . By Kevin G. Cain* The McDonald’s Coffee Lawsuit 14 Journal of Consumer & Commercial Law omehow‚ somewhere along the way‚ the McDonald’s coffee lawsuit became the poster child for frivolous lawsuits. Who hasn’t taken a crack at this lawsuit for the sake of furthering their own cause? David Letterman and numerous other comedians have exploited this case as the punch-line to countless jokes.1 One of my favorite Seinfeld episodes involves Cosmo Kramer suing
Premium Law Burn Lawsuit
Introduction Plaintiff: Bill‚ Charles & Don Defendant: Allan Allan advertised his motorcar for sale at $50‚000. Bill‚ Charles and Don came down for viewing. The entire three customers Bill‚ Charles and Don each have their own negotiating reasons with Allan. Allan did not response and remains silent. After that Eric was last person to come down for viewing the car. Liked and accepted Allan offers‚ immediately the car was sold to him. Having to hear that the car was already been sold‚ the plaintiffs
Premium Law Contract Common law