Rick Richards‚ et ux. v. Commissioner Facts: The petitioners‚ Mr. Richards and Mrs. Richards‚ Issues: 1. Whether petitioner (both Mr. Richards and Mrs. Richards) conducted their writing or acting activities with the objective of making a profit within the meaning of §186? 2. Whether petitioners have substantiated the ordinary and necessary business expense of these activities? 3. Whether petitioners are entitled to carry forward a net operating loss from a prior tax year 4. Whether petitioners
Premium Law Legal terms Civil procedure
Brief 3 Circuit City Stores‚ Inc. v Mantor Procedural History • Paul Mantor sues Circuit City Stores‚ Inc. alleging twelve causes of action. • State Court granted Circuit City’s motion to compel Arbitration. • Mantor appealed that the arbitration agreement was unenforceable due to it being unconscionable. Issue If the arbitration agreement between Circuit City Stores‚ Inc. and Paul Mantor was unconscionable? Facts • In 1995‚ Circuit City Stores‚ Inc. instituted an arbitration
Premium Civil procedure Appeal Contract
Denzel Hartley 04.14.2013 SPM 333 Facility Negligence/Crowd Management BOYER v. IOWA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSN. The case against Iowa High School Athletic Association was created by Marian Boyer. Marian Boyer attended a basketball game Roosevelt Junior High School in Mason City‚ Iowa. Boyer‚ her husband and two other witnesses‚ Mr and Mrs Garland‚ sat together at the tow row bleachers. According to the case brief when the bleachers are not in use they are pushed
Premium Law United States Civil procedure
The plaintiff‚ Jean Hatter‚ by and through her attorney‚ Nancy McGee‚ for her Complaint against the Defendant alleges the following: 1. Plaintiff is a citizen of North Carolina‚ residing at 123 Shirtsleeve Drive‚ Durham‚ North Carolina‚ 27517. The action occurred in the state of North Carolina‚ county of Durham. 2. Defendant is incorporated to do business in the state of North Carolina‚ with the principal location of business being 456 Food Shop Road‚ Durham‚ North Carolina‚ 27517‚ and the defendant’s
Premium Civil procedure United States Legal terms
Facts to be Determined:Facts There were documents providing that the company did‚ in fact‚ terminate the position of all “Junior Executive Secretary”. This will be in Company’s favor to prove that they did not unlawfully terminate Ms. Lawson the defendant because of her being pregnant. Subpoenas for Howell Jewelry World appeared to be evidence of the company tweaked agreement from his employers. (McAdams‚ 2015). The legal department had requested that there be documents inclosing the signed agreement
Premium Law Jury Civil procedure
Res judicata literally means that the matter has already been decided and the meaning of a special plea of res judicata is that the matter or question raised by the other side has been finally adjudicated upon in proceedings between the parties and that it therefore cannot be raised again.1 There are requirements that should be satisfied for a special plea of res judicata to be granted which are; the dispute is between the same parties‚ for the same relief and on the same cause of action.2 These
Premium Common law Dispute resolution Lawsuit
Illegal association - Section 11(2) of the companies act 1956 talks about illegal association which states No company‚ association or partnership consisting of more than twenty persons shall be formed for the purpose of carrying on any other business that has for its object the acquisition of gain by the company‚ association or partnership‚ or by the individual members thereof‚ unless it is registered as a company under this Act‚ or is formed in pursuance of some other Indian law. As important
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Company Law
“UST Inc” case study The primary business risks associated with UST are as follows: First‚ legal challenges will cause litigation expenses‚ lawsuits expenses and settlement payments‚ which will decrease the operating income and cash flow and will increase the risks of debt default. From the industry level‚ the smokeless tobacco manufactures have faced less exposure to health related lawsuits than cigarette manufactures because the scientific evidence linking smokeless tobacco to cancer is less
Premium Finance Cigarette Tobacco
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 John Quincy Jones c/o (street address) city‚ state‚ by [00000] Tele: 000-000-0000 John Quincy Jones‚ Appears as: Sui Juris (FILL IN NAME OF COURT HERE) THE STATE OF (NAME OF STATE)‚ Plaintiff‚ vs. JOHN QUINCY JONES‚ Aggrieved Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: (enter your case number here) WRIT OF PRAECIPE TO THE COURT CLERK Date: (? th) Day of (month)‚ 2005 (time of trial)‚ Traffic Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2. Therefore you are respectfully
Premium Civil procedure Plaintiff State
1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts 2 The Trail Court 3 Judgment of Divorce 4 Present: February 20‚ 2011 5 Hon. John Doe Justice 6 Patricia Bean‚ Plaintiff Vs. 7 David Bean‚ Defendant 8 This action was submitted to this court for consideration this 20th day of February‚ 2013. 9 The Defendant was served personally within the State of Massachusetts. 10 Plaintiff presented a verified complaint. 11 The Defendant has filed an answer or amended answer
Premium Plaintiff Pleading Complaint