updating of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet‚ the two warring families of Verona now two streets gangs of kids from two different immigrant cultures coexisting in one New York City neighborhood. West Side Story demonstrates yet again the enduring quality of Shakespeare’s work‚ how he explored personal desires and social structures so intrinsically human that we can still identify with his characters 400 years later and recognize how our reinvented society mirrors those of his plays. Young lovers Maria
Premium Romeo and Juliet Musical theatre New York City
Cliques: A High School Social Structure Caste Systems are common wherever there is a society. If you are at the top of a caste system‚ life is good. As a normal person‚ one cannot find the way to the top of the pyramid‚ but can fall into the depths of the outcasts and untouchables. If one is an untouchable‚ they’re stuck. One cannot go down any further‚ as one is at the bottom‚ and one most certainly cannot go up. Things have changed since then‚ but groupings haven’t. People have been grouped
Premium High school The Breakfast Club Social groups
101-052 Professor. Wyzykowski 2/21/12 Sociology in Our Times: Chapter 4 Outline: Social Structure and Interaction in Everyday Life I. Components of Social Structure A. Status 1. Status is a socially defined position in a group or society characterized by certain expectations‚ rights‚ and duties. 2. Status set compromises all the statuses that a person occupies at a given time. 3. Ascribed status is a social position conferred at birth or received involuntarily later in life‚ based on attributes
Premium Sociology
Arizona v. Gant PALS480-Capstone June 20‚ 2012 The Parties • Plaintiff – State of Arizona • Defendant – Rodney Gant • Appellant – State of Arizona • Respondent – Rodney Gant Procedural History • Respondent‚ Rodney Gant‚ was arrested for driving with a suspended license. Subsequent to the search of the Gant’s vehicle officers found cocaine in the back seat. At trial Gant moved to have the evidence suppressed denied that there was probable cause to search the vehicle‚ but did
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
The case of Miranda v. Arizona dealt with the question‚ “Does the police practice of interrogating individuals without notifying them of their right to counsel and their protection against self-incrimination violate the Fifth Amendment?” This case started in 1963‚ when Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix‚ Arizona for robbing $8 from a bank worker‚ and was charged with armed robbery. He already had a record for armed robbery‚ and a juvenile record including attempted rape‚ assault‚ and burglary
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Charisma Thorpe Brunswick Political Systems- Final 6 October 2014 Miranda v. Arizona Outline Argued: February 28‚ March 1 and 2‚ 1966 Decided: June 13‚ 1966 Supreme Court Decision: The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Miranda and it also enforced the Miranda warning to be given to a person being interrogated while in the custody of the police. Miranda Warning: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say or do can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States
Ernesto Miranda‚ a 22-year-old individual from Mesa‚ Arizona was a young man coming from a harsh childhood and who had obtained criminal record too early in his life. Miranda was arrested on March 13‚ 1963 in Phoenix for the kidnapping and rape of 18-year-old Rebecca Ann Johnson. His arresting officers‚ Carol Cooley and Wilfred Young‚ interrogated Miranda for two hours without informing him of his self-incrimination rights‚ or even his right to an attorney. This unconstitutional act on behalf
Premium Miranda v. Arizona United States Constitution
In her 1959 article “Individual Autonomy and Social Structure”‚ Dorothy Lee analyzes the relationship between individual autonomy‚ the freedom to make one’s choices in life‚ and social structure‚ the rules governing social interaction stemming from common cultural values. Lee analyzes how individual autonomy and social structure relate to each other in various societies‚ and the issues that arise when thinking of these two concepts as mutually exclusive‚ especially in Western society. She explores
Premium Sociology Individualism
Case Brief Miranda v. Arizona Citation: 384 U.S. 436‚ 10 Ohio Misc. 9‚ 86 S. Ct. 1602‚ 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966) Brief Fact Summary: Self-incriminating evidence was provided by the defendants while interrogated by police without prior notification of the Fifth Amendment Rights of the United States Constitution. Synopsis of Rule of Law: Authorities of the Government must notify suspects of their Fifth Amendment constitutional rights prior to an interrogation following an arrest. Facts: The Supreme
Premium Miranda v. Arizona United States Constitution Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Miranda V. Arizona In Miranda v. Arizona‚ The issue the court had to consider was if the statements obtained from Mr. Miranda while he was subjected to police interrogation would be admissible against him in a criminal trial‚ and if the police procedures which ensures Mr. Miranda is made aware of his rights under the Fifth Amendment not to be forced to incriminate himself‚ are necessary. The Bill of Rights guarantees that everyone has the right to due process. The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark
Premium Miranda v. Arizona United States Constitution Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution