called Zinser 351 in order to save the declined sales and increase its competitive force. In deciding whether or not to invest Zinser 351‚ it is important to get the NPV and the payback period. To get the NPV and the payback period‚ we firstly need to forecast the future cash flows that the new machine will generate. We found the ten-year NPV to be $3‚171‚551 based on the FCFs that we forecast. Also‚ we use the payback period to analyze the acceptance of this project. We found that the discounted payback
Premium Cash flow Free cash flow Net present value
FINC 6001 Assignment 1 According to the NPV analysis‚ if the predicted cash flow is correct‚ opening the sixth restaurant could bring limited profit to the company. From where the investors sit‚ Lisa and Mark might reject the project. They could compare with other investment opportunities by NPV method. Meanwhile sensitivity analysis would be used for offering more information to explain the project. Due to the different data in year 1 and the rest of years‚ I separated the sensitivity calculation
Premium Net present value Costs
Case Study #1: Green Valley Medical 1-Green Valley Medical Center is a nonprofit teaching hospital affiliated with a large state university and had grown since its foundation in the 1930s with continuous support from state revenues. Since it is a nonprofit organization its main goal is not to create profit for the investors‚ but to reach their institutional goals‚ which in this case is to offer good service for the region it is located in and to train the students that attend to the state university
Premium Net present value Weighted average cost of capital Internal rate of return
Project. With the help of a few questions that guide my memo‚ I will be able to determine whether or not to continue funding for the Merseyside Project. This memo will include an exhibit that will show an analysis of the Merseyside Project including the NPV and the IRR. In the DCF analysis that was provided in the case I have made a few changes to it and that will be presented later in my memo. First I will like to talk about how Diamond Chemicals evaluate its capital expenditure proposals. Before
Premium Carbon Diamond Atom
Capital Investment Decision Strayer University Graduate Accounting Capstone ACC-599 September 28‚ 2013 Professor: Dr. Mary Johnson Abstract The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act‚ signed into legislation in July of 2010‚ by President Barack Obama‚ as a result of the financial crisis that began in 2008‚ which resulted in massive failure of large financial institutions‚ threatening the financial stability of the U.S.‚ as well as the global economy (Dodd‚ C.
Premium Net present value Capital budgeting Investment
returns relative to the amount invested and does not give a fixed dollar amount of return‚ unlike NPV which is prone to error. IRR also discounts the cash flows unlike the undiscounted payback period. IRR also proves to be accurate because accdg. To this method‚ among the investment alternatives of IEI‚ only (c) or the combined project is acceptable because IRR>cc. This is consistent with the payback and NPV method where only c is acceptable as well. 8. (a)The undiscounted payback method ranks the
Premium Net present value Rate of return
CASE 2 Cash Flow Estimation and Risk Analysis Robert Montoya‚ Inc. Robert Montoya‚ Inc.‚ is a leading producer of wine in the United States. The firm was founded in 1960 by Robert Montoya‚ an Air Force veteran who had spent several years in France both before and after World War II. This experience convinced him that California could produce wines that were as good as or better than the best France had to offer. Originally‚ Robert Montoya sold his wine to wholesalers for distribution
Premium Cash flow Net present value Operating cash flow
the net present value (NPV) is the sum of the discounted cash flows minus the original investment. One of the major problems with Pan-Europa is their existing low stock price. In order to increase their value‚ they must take up projects that increase their stock values‚ including those that would allow them to increase gross sales that have been stagnant over the years. The values presented in Exhibit 3 allow us to compare these projects based on various factors. Considering NPV as a factor‚ it is suggested
Premium Net present value
Uniform Annual Equivalent (UAE) - A Capital Budgeting Method. (The evaluation of two mutually exclusive projects with varying lives requires careful examination of the existence of the reinvestment opportunities at the end of the different economic lives of the projects. The current article deals with a method that may be adopted in situations wherein the level of investments‚ the life of the projects and cash inflows (or outflows) are unequal.) Risk is inherent in almost every business decisions
Premium Net present value Time value of money Investment
capital as 9.87%. We then used the cash flows to calculate the company’s NPV. We first calculated the NPV by using the 15% discount rate; by using that number we calculated a negative NPV of $2‚162‚760. We determined that the discount rate of 15% was out dated and insufficient. To calculate a more accurate NPV for the project‚ we decided to use the rate of 9.87% that we computed. Using this number we got the NPV of $577‚069. With the NPV of $577‚069 our conclusion is to accept this project as long as everything
Premium Net present value Cash flow Internal rate of return