LIST OF CASES: 1. Davis v. Johnson‚(1978) 2 WLR 182 2. Delhi Transport Corporation v. DTC Mazdoor Cong. and Others‚ AIR 1991 SC 101 3. All India Reporter Karmachari Singh v.All India Reporter Ltd.‚ AIR 1988 SC 1325 4. Ram Manohar Lohia v.State of UP and others‚ AIR 1968‚Alld. 100 5. Ahmed Khan v. Shah bano Begum‚ (1985) SCR (3) 844 6. His Holiness Kesavnand Bharti Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala‚ AIR 1973 SC 1461 7. Indira Sawhney v. Union of India‚ AIR 1993 SC 477 8. Vishakha and others
Free Common law Law
Management Strategy Case Questions Case 5: Panera Bread Company 1. What is Panera Bread’s strategy? Which of the four generic competitive strategies discussed in Chapter 3 most closely fit the competitive approach that Panera Bread is taking? What specific kind of competitive advantage is Panera bread trying to achieve? 2. What does a SWOT analysis of Panera Bread reveal about the overall attractiveness of its situation? Does the company have any core competencies or distinctive competencies
Premium Strategic management
Institute Of Personnel Management Sri Lanka NAME OF THE PROGRAMME : - PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATON IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TOPIC OF THE CASE STUDY : - PERERA CONFECTIONARIES MODULE NUMBER : - MODULE 01 NAME OF THE LECTURE : - MRS. RAJEE RAVICHANDRAN For Office Use Only: 1. Final Marks : ……………………….. 2. Remarks : ……………………….. (To be filled by the Examiner) LATE SUBMISSION NO OF DAYS Content Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………………………
Premium Management
The parable of Sadu Group X 1. Define the main issues presented in the case. Individual perception on ethics Individual ethics vs. group ethics How group ethics influence behavior of individuals and other way around How lack of leadership and group ethics influence behavior of individuals towards Sadhu and within companies How lack of leadership and group ethics influence behavior of individuals within the companies Necessity for CSR frameworks 2. Evaluate how the key parties
Premium Ethics Philosophy of life
pay the value of the checks. Hence‚ four (4) charges of estafa were filed against petitioner with the Regional Trial Court of Dagupan City‚ docketed as Crim. Cases Nos. D-8728‚ D-8729‚ D-8730 and D-8731. Arturo de Guzman was charged with two (2) counts of violation of B.P. Blg. 22‚ docketed as Crim. Cases Nos. D-8733 and D-8734. These cases against petitioner and de Guzman were consolidated and tried jointly. On 27 December 1989 the court a quo[2] acquitted petitioner of all the charges of estafa
Premium Appeal Appellate court Criminal law
International Management II (Core Competencies) Case Study Bank of America (A) by Alexander Beil Christoph Hillgärtner Florian Schlegelmilch Harvard Case Study: Bank of America List of Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Introduction / Definitions Overview “Bank of America” Product development processes Strength and weaknesses of the systems Learning through experimentation Conclusion / Learnings Summary Questions for group discussion References 1 Harvard Case Study: Bank of America 1. Introduction
Premium Management Strategic management Organization
Case Study Evaluation Protocol and Procedures Evaluation of the overall quality of each case study will be made on the following criteria: CASE STUDY PARTS CRITERIA Abstract Summary paragraph introducing the project‚ building‚ hypothesis‚ highlights of findings. concise brief of the parts to the case study. Introduction Description of building‚ background information‚ designer’s intent‚ observations‚ and how team decided on topic. selection of an interesting or challenging building;
Free Scientific method Case study Evaluation methods
------------------------------------------------- Foss v Harbottle Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189 is a leading English precedent in corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company‚ the proper claimant is the company itself. This is known as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle"‚ and the several important exceptions that have been developed are often described as "exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle". Amongst these is the ’derivative action’‚ which allows
Premium Pleading Plaintiff Corporation
Buad308- Management and Organizational Behavior Professor Mary Case Incident 2 1、 Of the three types of organizational justice‚ which one does workplace bullying most closely resemble? Of the three types of organizational justice‚ the interactional justice is the most resemble to the workplace bullying. Because the interactional justice describe an individual’s perception of the degree to which she is treated with dignity‚ concern‚ and respect. 2、 What aspects of motivation might workplace
Premium Maslow's hierarchy of needs Social cognitive theory Albert Bandura
dated September 30‚ 2011 and the resolution dated February 15‚ 2012 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 117361‚ which dismissed the petition filed by 3rd Alert Security and Detective Services‚ Inc. (3rd Alert). The Antecedent Facts This case started from an illegal dismissal complaint filed by Romualdo Navia against 3rd Alert. On November 30‚ 2005‚ the labor arbiter issued a decision that Navia’s dismissal was illegal. 3rd Alert appealed to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC)
Premium Appeal Employment Supreme Court of the United States