Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 A case discussion note January 17‚ 2012 1. Historically‚ why has the soft drink industry been so profitable? Historically‚ the soft carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been valued at $74 billion in the United States. In order to understand the reasons why the industry has been hugely profitable despite the ‘Cola Wars’‚ an examination of the CSD industry with Porter’s five forces analysis will be conducted. As market leaders‚ the analysis will
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola
COLA WARS CONTINUE: COKE AND PEPSI IN 2006 The case is about the rivalry between two of the biggest companies in the world‚ Coca Cola and Pepsi. It is a battle which started in the early 1990s and which still characterizes the soft drink industry; but‚ as a former CEO of Pepsi said‚ it is a “battle without blood”: Coca Cola could not exist without Pepsi and the other way round. They mutually force each other to adapt their strategy to customers’ new needs‚ to apply competitive prices and to face
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola
Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola have a long history of intense competition since 1950. Besides the CSD (carbonated soft drink) consumption rise‚ it brought both Coke and Pepsi enjoyed significant revenue growth. In 2004‚ CSD has 52.3% of total US Liquid Consumption. Coke and Pepsi had 22.1% and 14.4% in Net profit/sales respectively. There are four major participants involved in the production and distribution of CSDs: 1. Concentrate Producers (Coke‚ Pepsi‚ and others))
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Soft drink
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 1. Why is the soft drink industry so profitable? In an industry dominated by two heavyweight contenders‚ Coke and Pepsi‚ in fact‚ between 1996 and 2004 per capita consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) remained between 52 to 54 gallons per year. Consumption grew by an average of 3% per year over the next three decades. Fueling this growth were the increasing availability of CSD‚ the introduction of diet and flavored varieties‚ and brand extensions
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink Pepsi
Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola vied for a “throat share” of the soft drinks market for more than a century. Carbonated soft drinks (CSD) contributed to majority of the revenues in soft drinks. 丁he core market was Ihc United States which had high per capita consumption (see Exhibit 1 for per capita consumption of carbonates in select countries). The Americas accounted for 54% of the global CSD market. Europe for 34.5%‚ and Asia-Pacific for 1 \%.] The industry was characterized by the presence of strong
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink
effects of service quality and the mediating role of customer satisfaction Colgate‚ M.‚ Stewart‚ K.‚ & Kinsella‚ R. (1996). Customer defection: A study of the student market in Ireland Cronin‚ J. J.‚ & Taylor‚ S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A re-examination and extension Doraisamy‚ B.‚ Shanmugam‚ A.‚ & Raman‚ R. (2011). A study on consumers’ preferences of Islamic banking products and services in Sungai Petani Dusuki‚ A. W.‚ & Abdullah‚ N. I. (2007). Why do Malaysian customers patronize Islamic
Premium Bank Islamic banking
competition within the $74 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been remarkable ever since Coca-Cola was formulated in 1886‚ and further intensified when Pepsi was introduced in 1893. Ever since then‚ the CSD industry has been dominated by these two companies‚ with Coke taking the lead in the early stage‚ followed by Pepsi doubled its market share between 1950 and 1970 by offering its concentrate at a lower price than its competitor. The CSD industry has been profitable historically due
Premium Brand Coca-Cola Brand management
Financial Analysis Edward Kowalski XACC/280 22July12 Dr. Edward Walden University of Phoenix a) PEPSICO‚ INC. Trend Analysis of Net Sales and Net Income For the Five Years Ended 2005 Base Period 2001—(in millions) | | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1) | ------------------------------------------------- Net sales Trend | | $32562 |
Premium Revenue Income statement Financial ratio
Introduction The carbonated soft drinks’ (CSD’s) sector is dominated by three major players: Coke is dominant company of the soft drink industry and boasts a global market share of around 44%‚ followed by PepsiCo at about 31%‚ and Cadbury Schweppes at 14.7% (Exhibit 3). Separately from these major players‚ smaller companies such as Cott Corporation and Royal Crown form the remaining market share. Coke and Pepsi are the main pieces of this market. They struggle for over a century to conquer the number
Premium Management Learning German language
Question 1) With examples give 5 reasons why the study of microeconomics is important. Microeconomics is a field of economic study that focuses on how an individual ’s behaviour and decisions affect the supply and demand for goods and services. For the purpose of microeconomics‚ the actions of individuals‚ households and businesses are crucial‚ unlike the study of macroeconomics‚ which focuses on national and international economic trends. Despite the differences between the two fields‚ however
Premium Economics Supply and demand Macroeconomics