hours in advance. Failure to do so can impact this contract leading up to cancelation of said contract. You will provide your own vehicle keeping it in good maintenance‚ gas‚ cell phone and internet access for the purpose of doing said work. Term of this contract is valid from the date signed for a period of 1 year. Contract may be cancelled from signee if given in writing a 15 day notice of intent to quit. The company may terminate this contract immediately with good reason written and delivered
Premium Customer service Customer Contract
Explain the effect terms in a contract. Implied terms are not stated in a contract but are introduced in a contract by a statute. 1. The handset will correspond with description supplied at the time of sale. This is an implied term by the sales of good act as it has to correspond with the description on the box. Also statute would protect the customer and it should be what is said on the box. The sales of good act states where there is a sale of good by description there is an implied
Premium Contract Sales Contractual term
Contracts Outline I. Introduction a. What is a K?: A promise of a set of promises for the breach of which the law provides a legal remedy. § 1. b. Hawkins v. McGee – an expectation to the idea that most medical promises should be argued in malpractice suit c. Bayliner v. Crow – promise was Insufficiently specific i. General intro into what kind of promises are enforceable II. Remedies (Prelim.) a. 2 assumptions – Naval & Sullivan i. Rather than punishing
Premium Contract
Essentialia The contract of employment is an agreement between two parties in terms of which one party (Mr. Phage) places his labour potential at the disposal and under the control of the other party (Lifeline services)‚ in exchange for some form of remuneration. From this definition‚ it is clear that the essentialia of a contract of employment are 1. Work and 2. Remuneration. This contract does not meet the requirement for work because even though an ambiguous job title of ‘General Worker’
Premium Law Employment Trade union
Assignement 1 contracts Sayres v. Wheatland Group‚ L.L.C.‚ 79 Va. Cir. 504 (Va. Cir. Ct. 2009) CASE SUMMARYPROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiff filed suit against defendants alleging that the contract for the construction and sale of a home that was at issue in this case was void‚ invalid‚ and unenforceable. Plaintiff also alleged that he was entitled to rescission and cancellation of the same contract. Defendants filed a counterclaim for specific performance of the contract of sale. Plaintiff moved
Premium Contract
Contract of employment Employer: Al-Futtaim real estate Company Dubai – UAE Employee: Ahmed Tarek Mohamed Sharjah – 22 Al Wahda Street UAE Place of Work: The Employee shall be based for the time being at Al-Futtaim real estate Company in Sharjah. 1. Job Function: The Employee shall be employed as Accountant 2. Probationary Period: A probationary period of three months will apply. A letter‚ notifying the Employee of his appointment to permanent staff‚ will be
Premium Employment Working time Leave
Financial Risk Management‚ FIN3FRM Semester 2‚ 2012 Assignment 1 Q.1 An investor enters into a short forward contract to sell 100‚000 British pounds for U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of 1.9000 U.S. dollars per pound. How much does the investor gain or lose if the exchange rate at the end of the contract is (a) 1.8900 and (b) 1.9200? (2 points) Solutions: a) The investor as part of obligation for selling pounds‚ because of his obligation to sell
Premium Futures contract Derivative Hedge
A. Concern v Good The incident between Mr. Good and Mr. Concern is being introduced in this case. Mr. Good put up an article on The Best Daily saying that he would share half of the advertising cost for anyone who places an advertisement in Best Daily with the intention of ‘initiating major legal response to raise climate change consciousness of the people of Hong Kong’. Our client‚ Mr. Concern who responded to Mr. Good’s offer‚ placed advertisements in 15 newspapers expressing ‘support for social
Premium Contract
to Jenny is not binding. Advise Jenny as to whether she has any cause of action against her father. This case pertains whether a clear promise was demonstrated to form a legal contract between Jenny and her father to determine whether Jenny has any cause of action against her father. According to the contracts act 1950‚ section 2(d)‚ when at the desire of the promisor‚ the promise or any other person has done or abstained from doing‚ or does or abstains from doing‚ or promises to do or to
Premium Contract
Issue: Does Pete have an enforceable contract with Debbie? Rule : : Contract formation requires mutual assent (offer and acceptance)‚ consideration‚ and no viable defenses to contract formation. 1. Is there a valid offer? Offer an offer is the manifestation of a willingness to enter into a bargain‚ in must be done in such a way that another person should understand that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude in forming a contract. Pete has to show that Debbie made a promise
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance