human nature‚ communalism‚ and private property of both philosophers. Before we encounter Aristotle’s practicable state we must look at Plato’s idea of communalism. Plato highlights that it is philosopher kings who should rule and be removed from private life. His notions are quite extreme because of the mere fact that his form of rulership is one that is stripped from attaining wealth and also familial roles. One can argue that this notion is doomed to fail. If this notion of communalism were to be
Free Aristotle Political philosophy
Anything about a countries political scenario has to have a resemblance with the country’s CONSTITUTION. And when we talk about Indian communalism the constitution itself is questioned. It is an interesting fact that the country that boasts of being secular in the international forum did not define themselves in the same way till 1976‚ which is till thirty years after independence. And funnily even after the forty-second amendment the word was mentioned only in the preamble and nowhere else. So does
Premium Gujarat Secularism India
Cited: Bhagat‚ R. B. “Census and the Construction of Communalism in India.” In Economic and Political Weekly‚ Vol 36‚ No. 46/47‚ pp. 4352-4356‚ Nov 2001. Oberoi‚ Harjot. “The Construction of Religious Boundaries: Culture‚ Identity and Diversity in the Sikh Tradition”‚ pp 1-23. University of Chicago Press‚ 1994
Premium Religion Hinduism Islam
integration of its citizens is not a chore. The citizens are facing with the problems of economic disparity and rampant poverty; persistence of socio-economic inequality between and within the rural and the urban segments of the people; casteism‚ communalism and religious fundamentalism; and political populism and political exploitations. Due to the problems‚ national integration in India still remains as a myth. Socio-economic inequality in India is a heritage of long history. Inequality in India’s
Premium Caste India Caste system in India
many communities‚ races classes‚ languages and subcultures. In any such nation‚ there are many obstacles to the achievement of national integration. In India the following hindrances are obstructing the growth of national feeling‚ casteism‚ communalism‚ linguistic fanaticism‚ social disparity‚ economic inequalities and immorality‚ regionalism etc. 1. Casteism: Caste is an imported part of our social fabric. This was developed in the past on the basis of division of labour in the society
Free India Caste German language
Whereas a heart cannot beat without love‚ a story cannot survive without its gripping characters. The characters within a story are the key elements that essentially bring the story’s theme to life. In the novel‚ Their Eyes Were Watching God‚ author Zora Neale Hurston showcases the African American experience as the story discusses the issues of racism and social inequality among races and genders. The author conveys the theme of feminism through her compelling female characters‚ yet Hurston reinforces
Premium Black people African American White people
political‚ economic‚ linguistic and cultural unity. 4) Common ideas of life and common code of behavior. 5) The ability to subordinate sectarian and parochial loyalties to loyalty of the nation. Obstacles to National Integration 1) Communalism The greatest menace to the national solidarity of a
Premium Nation Political party Leadership
Secularism In India -- A Brief Study - By Kamaluddin Khan By Kamaluddin Khan‚ The challenges of castism‚ communalism and religious fundamentalism‚ involving separatism and violence in India‚ are the major threats to our secular polity. They weaken the working and stability of our secular federal system and militate against the basic principles governing our national life and providing meaning to our new identity. Our national movement was the biggest and the most widespread anti-imperialist movement
Premium Religion Secularism Indian National Congress
settlement. Unlike Wood who focuses on the ideological effects of the revolution on the common man through the rhetoric of equality‚ Brown argues the post-war development was fundamentally economic‚ with land being the great equalizer. In Feudalism‚ Communalism‚ and the Yeoman Freeholder (1973)‚ John M. Murrin vacillates on the importance of the American Revolution to later social development in the United States. He is willing to concede an argument which is similar to Wood’s monarchy/democracy theory
Premium United States American Civil War Democracy
otherwise) that need help‚ comparing it to his childhood memory of his mother telling him that “In the old days‚ no one went hungry as long as there was food‚ and everyone had a place to sleep”. This demonstrates the Aboriginal mentality of communalism (vs. individualism) that dictates that everyone in the group is important and responsible for following the laws of nature‚ as they believe that individuals within a community are all interconnected‚ and that the harmony of a group helped keep the
Free Indigenous Australians