conclusions that made them very famous. Rene Descartes and John Locke were two philosophers that had the same idea‚ but different views of it. Descartes was a rationalist‚ which are people that argue that only reason can separate reality from illusion and give meaning to experience. The idea that eliminates reasoning can produce certain truths about reality and those important truths can be discovered without observations‚ experiment‚ or experience. Locke on the other hand was an empiricist. An empiricist
Premium Mind Epistemology Metaphysics
1. State of nature‚ defined differently by all of us according to our own understanding‚ made lots of importance to English philosophers like Thomas Hobbes‚ John Locke‚ and Jean Jacques Rousseau. In the state of nature‚ there is no above authority or government for everyone’s safety and peaceful living; everyone is in their own matter‚ and there in no unity of people even living in the same city. Every individual is judge of their own deeds. Strong individual is allowed to crush the weak in any
Premium Political philosophy State of nature Social contract
John Locke “The end of law is not to abolish or restrain‚ but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings capable of law‚ where there is no law‚ there is no freedom” – John Locke. What I feel that John Locke is attempting to express in his quote is that society believes that by having laws in place the government is taking away from the freedom they long to endure. However‚ by having laws in place it actually helps to enforce their rights to freedom. I chose
Premium John Locke United States Declaration of Independence Political philosophy
Founder Vs Founder 1. The Enlightenment thinker that I most agree with is John Locke. I most agree with him because he concurs with Hobbes about the severity of the condition of nature‚ which obliges a social contract to guarantee peace. Be that as it may‚ he can’t help contradicting 2 things. He contended that regular rights‚ for example‚ life‚ liberty‚ and property existed in the condition of nature and could never be taken away or even willfully surrendered by people. Locke additionally couldn’t help
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes Social contract
Enlightenment‚ freedom‚ and Political rights: creating a “just” society Hobbes: “life is nasty‚ brutish‚ and short...” Pessimistic about humans fear of anarchy--bad for economics Ultimate power with strong ruler “Leviathan” John Locke: “Wherever law ends‚ tyranny begins.” Rights: “life‚ liberty‚ and property...” optimistic about humans IF equality and tolerance.... ultimate power with people Thomas Hobbe’s In Leviathan‚ Thomas Hobbe’s argued that ordinary people were incapable of
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes Social contract
1. a. Locke denies innate principles‚ as there are no principles to which all mankind give a universal assent. He begins his denial of innate principles by stating that “Universal consent proves nothing innate” (pg. 319‚ 3.). With this statement he claims that even if there were universal principles that all mankind agreed with‚ this would still not prove these principles innate if there could be any way to show how those in agreement came to consent to these ideas. But‚ for Locke‚ there are no universal
Premium John Locke Empiricism Philosophy
Thomas Hobbes observed the events of the Civil Wars and Glorious Revolution and spoke on the nature of man. He believed that man‚ as a rule‚ was self-involved and apt to be cruel‚ so a strong central government was necessary to reign in man’s true natures of desire‚ greed‚ and vengeance. In that vein‚ he felt that it was the obligation of the people to surrender certain rights to the will of a sovereign to ensure the well-being of society. His contemporary‚ John Locke‚ while agreeing
Premium United States Europe Indigenous peoples of the Americas
Hobbes Human nature since the beginning of time has been to fight for control over things someone found useful . To “control” something that would make yourself powerful or even god-like. Most have tried by force ‚ fear and even love to control various things from land and weapons and even smaller things like rice and water . It has taken figures with strong mentalitys to pause the everyday fight for key essentials to focus and sometimes even dedicate their life to the humans and
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes
John Locke‚ whose focus on The Rule Of Law‚ believes that humans(independent agents) who join political society(protection:rule of law) that the end result is to preserve and enlarge freedom. He believed “In all the states of created beings capable of law‚ where there is no law‚ there is no freedom”.(pg.107) Locke focused on rights and laws‚ where he believed that people left the “lawless state of nature”‚due to having no independent judge.(p.106) Locke’s principle suggests separation of the legislative
Premium Political philosophy John Locke Property
Political Philosophy Hobbes‚ Locke‚ and the Social Contract The concept of human security‚ which has had a crucial place in human’s societal history‚ has been argued over by many great philosophers throughout mankind’s existence. Two pioneer thinkers of political philosophy‚ Thomas Hobbes and John Locke‚ theorized state of nature typologies‚ which are the core of social contract theory‚ and created a concept of modern security‚ even in the 17th century. Hobbes created a contract entrusting
Premium Social contract Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes