When deciding whether the Constitution better embodied the American commitment to democracy (republicanism)‚ or whether it produced a greater compromise to it‚ one must define the nature of a republican government. Both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist set forth their distinctive views on the quality of representational government‚ but it was James Madison and Alexander Hamilton vision I feel was the most correct. By accepting their view‚ it is clear that they propose the best arguments for why
Free United States Constitution Separation of powers Federalism
people were created: Federalists‚ who supported the new Constitution; and the Anti-Federalists‚ who were against the new form of government. During the Constitutional Convention‚ both parties presented their case‚ their form of government and evidence supporting why that was the best way for America to be governed. America must have a National and a State government in order to function properly and fulfill its people’s needs. On the one hand‚ there is Centinel‚ an Anti-federalist that argues in The
Premium United States United States Constitution President of the United States
The Federalists and the Anti Federalists went together like fire and ice. They always seemed to crash heads when it came to who should take power. The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves Federalists. They wanted a strong centered government. Unlike the Anti federalists‚ they were a diverse coalition of people who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Although less well organized than the Federalists‚ they also had an impressive group of leaders who were especially prominent
Premium United States United States Constitution President of the United States
the subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists‚ those who supported ratification‚ and Anti-Federalists‚ those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to be
Premium United States Constitution United States Federalist Papers
called the Federalists‚ wanted a stronger national government and one group called the Anti-Federalists‚ opposed the development of a national government. The Federalists ratified the Constitution to help properly manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. The Anti-Federalists opposed the development of a strong federal government and the ratification of the Constitution‚ preferring instead for power to remain in the hands of state and local governments. Although the Anti-Federalists
Premium
reform‚ alter‚ or totally change the same‚ when their protection‚ safety‚ prosperity‚ and happiness require it.” Federalists believed this‚ and fought verbal and written battles against the Anti-Federalists‚ who disagreed with John Adams. Anti-Federalists believed that in an elite democracy‚ the elite’s would get greedy and selfish‚ and only worry about themselves. As I’m on the Federalist side‚ I believe that John Adams was correct in his statement‚ and that the government is only trying to uphold
Premium Democracy James Madison Political philosophy
Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Debate After Articles of Confederation it was seen necessary to repeal the Articles and create one that is perfect for everyone in the country‚ but it wasn’t that easy. Federalists claimed that we needed a strong central government to prevent rebellions such as Shay’s Rebellion that damaged the states while the Anti-Federalists feared that a strong central government could turn into a kingdom like U.K. which they have fought and damaged deeply‚ recently. In different
Premium Separation of powers United States Constitution Judiciary
originally created‚ it did not contain a Bill of Rights. In the Constitutional Convention‚ the Federalists argued that the Bill of Rights was not necessary. Opposingly‚ the Anti-Federalists argued that the central government had too much power and that our Constitution needed a Bill of Rights that would explicitly state the rights of the citizens. In order to settle disputes between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists that claimed the government had an imbalance of power‚ the Bill of Rights was created.
Premium United States Constitution United States Supreme Court of the United States
The Anti-Federalist viewpoint is valid‚ and should be considered seriously. Their ideas on federalism and the Constitution were similar to the Federalists‚ but the Anti-Federalists wanted to add more precautions to the Constitution‚ and were especially careful about preventing tyranny from happening within the states. The Anti-Federalists were focussed on individual rights‚ and wanted the states to have a high power in the government. Each state at the time was vital for the growth of the United
Premium Federalism United States Democracy
organization was not as good as the Federalists; however‚ they had a profound group of leaders who were exceptional in state politics. Anti-Federalists were an important existence in most states. In several states‚ supporters of the Constitution agreed to provide support from mild anti-Federalists with recommendations to secure amendments. During ratification the expectation was that the Constitution would be changed to address some of the opponents’ concerns. The anti-Federalists worked within the Constitution’s
Premium United States Constitution United States Articles of Confederation