"Compare kant s categorical imperative to the golden rule" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 17 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant and Deontology Judy Havens‚ Claudia Burns‚ Amber Montalvo‚ Kimberly Jones BSHS/332 Audra Stinson University of Phoenix When people think of Ethical Theory then the word morals‚ respect‚ and honesty seem to come to mind. Kant devised an ethical theory that is broken down into major elements to explain what he believes is ethical for society to believe. This is where the act of good will comes to existence and the nature of a person’s demeanor comes into how he or she decides what is the

    Premium

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    VARIETIES OF CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM The previous chapter focused on the simple categorical syllogism. The present chapter deals with other varieties of categorical syllogism which in some arguments will prove useful in arriving at a conclusion. These varieties include the enthymeme‚ the epichereme‚ the polysyllogism‚ the sorites and the dilemma. The Enthymeme The enthymeme is an abbreviated or shortened type of categorical syllogism in that one of its premises or its conclusion is left unexpressed

    Premium Logic

    • 3178 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant Analysis

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant is a philosopher that has always stuck out because the way he approaches morality is particularly different than most other philosopher. Some would say that Kant’s philosophy works satisfactorily in a perfect world‚ but fails to account for how the world actually is‚ which is far from perfect. Even if this is true the groundwork of Kant’s work has still garnered the admiration of many philosophers that were during and after his time. Kant believes that a good will is based on the attitude

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Mill

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    proving what is” right and what is wrong”. Kant employs his views and thought of metaphysics as a discipline in his ethical philosophy. "if a law is to have moral force. Two of the greatest well known philosophers have thoughts on it and they are Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. Immanuel kant and John Stuart Mill consider the death penalty is fairly right ‚but they gives totally two different opposite thoughts and reasons on why it should be. Immanuel kant has very

    Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant vs. Singer

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    November 29‚ 2012 Singer VS. Kant Duty can be defined in numerous ways but what is difficult to know is what our moral obligations are? Immanuel Kant and Peter Singer have attempted to find a more simple‚ rational‚ and supreme rule for what our duty is. Singer makes the distinction between charity and duty.  He attempts to show that we‚ in affluent countries such as the United States‚ have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do in international aid for famine relief‚ disaster

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a front-page article found in The New York Times‚ Betsy DeVos makes several statements that could be summed up within a categorical syllogism. DeVos states‚ “Schools must continue to confront these horrific crimes and behaviors head on… the process must also be fair and impartial…” The categorical syllogism could go as follows; All horrific crime and behavioral related trials are fair and impartial processes. Some horrific crime and behavioral related trials are sexual assault trials. So‚ some

    Premium Law Sociology Crime

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant Vs Aristotle

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Despite several overlapping similarities between Aristotle and Kant on virtue ethics‚ there are fundamental differences between their view on the source of virtuous action. In this paper‚ I will argue‚ the underpinning behind each respectable view differs; as Aristotle believes virtuous action derives from choices lying in the mean whereas‚ Kant does not hold that virtuous action lies in the mean‚ but rather‚ holds they proceed from duty acting in accordance with universal principles. The fundamental

    Premium Virtue Ethics

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant Theory and Justice

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Immanuel Kant concerns himself with deontology‚ and as a deontologist‚ he believes that the rightness of an action depends in part on things other than the goodness of its consequences‚ and so‚ actions should be judged based on an intrinsic moral law that says whether the action is right or wrong – period. Kant introduced the Categorical Imperative which is the central philosophy of his theory of morality‚ and an understandable approach to this moral law. It is divided into three formulations. The

    Premium Discrimination Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Maxim Analysis

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As explained in lecture the first formulation of the categorical imperative is‚ “Act only in accordance with that maxim that you can at the same time will that it become a universal law.” First off‚ what does it mean to say‚ “Will as a universal law?” This means that you must ask yourself two questions. The first being whether you can consistently conceive of everyone acting on your maxim in all possible circumstances‚ and the second question being to ask yourself whether you can will everyone acting

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For Literal Rule‚ the judges will only look at the grammatical meaning of words to interpret. If the words are clear and unambiguous‚ even though the result makes nonsense of the law‚ they must be followed. In R v Judge of the City of London Court (1892)‚ Lord Esher said “If the words of an Act are clear‚ then you must follow them‚ even though they lead to manifest absurdity. The court has nothing to do with the question whether the legislature has committed an absurdity”. Fisher v Bell(1960) gave

    Premium Law Judge Absurdism

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
Page 1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 50