Toyota and GM: a Comparison of its Mission‚ Values‚ Social Responsibility‚ and Ethics Toyot Toyota and GM: a Comparison of its Mission‚ Values‚ Social Responsibility‚ and Ethics Toyota and General Motors are both in the manufacturing and sale of motor vehicles. They each have its own mission‚ values and conscientious effort to be socially responsible. A company’s mission‚ vision and core values define how the corporation functions and interacts with the local and global community. Corporations
Premium General Motors Corporate social responsibility Toyota
CHALLENGES 7 INDUSTRY OPPORTUNITIES 8 III-RATIO & STOCKS ANALYSIS GM TREND ANALYSIS 9 GM‚ FORD & TOYOTA BENCHMARK ANALYSIS 10 STOCK PERFORMANCES 12 IV-CONCLUSION CONCLUSION 14 V-APPENDIX COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 16 RATIO CALCULATIONS 21 WORKS CITED 27 I- company information General Motors (GM) is one of the biggest automotive manufacturers in the world‚ and the largest in the U.S. It’s headquarter is located in Detroit‚ MI. GM has total of 396 facilities in 6 continents and supplies
Premium General Motors Automotive industry Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
General Motors and Toyota Comparative Organization Analysis Organizational Theory Week 3 May 2013 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Organizations and Industry Context 3 Firm Structures 6 Strengths‚ Weaknesses‚ Opportunities and Threats 9 Insights from the Structural Frame 14 Conclusion 15 Illustrations 18 Works Cited 21 Introduction General Motors (GM) and Toyota are both well-known companies in the automotive industry. They offer quality products to their
Premium General Motors Automotive industry
1: Corporate Governance Both Ford and GM completely abide by NYSE corporate governance standards‚ as they are domestic US companies. Ford and GM are required to strictly follow NYSE corporate governance standards. Toyota is permitted to follow certain corporate governance practices complying with Japanese laws and regulations‚ the NYSE has ruled that Toyota is exempt from certain NYSE corporate governance requirements. A significant difference in Toyota’s corporate governance structure is that
Premium General Motors Ford Motor Company Corporate governance
--------------------------- 2 I. Overall Analysis ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 i. Analysis of Assets and Liability ---------------------------------------------------- 3 ii. Analysis of Profitability ------------------------------------------------------------- 3 II. Analysis of Operating Efficiency ------------------------------------------------------ 4 III. Analysis of Ability to Repay -----------------------------------------------------------
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Financial ratios
Introduction General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM)‚ the world’s largest automaker‚ has been the global industry sales leader for 76 years. General Motors was founded 1908‚ in Flint‚ Michigan and currently employs approximately 284‚000 people around the world. GM’s global headquarters is the Renaissance Center located in Detroit‚ Michigan‚ USA‚ They currently manufacture their cars and trucks in 35 different countries. Its European headquarters are based in Zurich‚ Switzerland‚ and its Holden headquarters
Premium General Motors Automotive industry Cash flow
TOYOTA • PBUS 03 (2012) NPU BY: Kavita‚ Danish‚ Rick * *Comprises of 3 ellipse *Heart of customer *Heart of product *technological advancement and opportunities that lies ahead * *1933: Automobile Department is established at Toyoda Automatic Loom Works‚ Ltd. *1934: Created its first product‚ the Type A engine *1936: Built first passenger car‚ the Toyota AA. *1937: Toyota Motor Co.‚ Ltd. is established. *1950: Company faces a financial crisis; Toyota Motor Sales Co.‚ Ltd. is established
Premium Toyota Financial ratios Asset
Selected Financial Data for Toyota Motors Corp.‚ Inc. 2010-2014 (in 000s‚ YEN‚ expect per share amounts)(Automotive Segment) Income Statement Data (in 000s) (YEN) - Automotive Segment 2010 17‚197 Net Revenues Revenue Growth Yr-Yr Cost of Goods sold 15‚971 COGS GrowthYr-Yr Gross Profit 1‚226 Gross Profit GrowthYr-Yr Selling‚ general and admin expenses 2‚120 Gross Profit GrowthYr-Yr Income From operations (Loss) 87 Income from Operations GrowthYr-Yr Interest Expense net Other expenses net
Premium Revenue Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Financial ratios
Ford is 120 percent while the current ratio of GM is 89 percent. The current ratio measures the company’s ability to pay short term and long term obligations. As Ford has the higher current ratio over GM‚ it depicts that Ford is more capable of paying its obligations to the creditors. The quick ratio of Ford is 110 percent while GM has 73 percent. Quick ratio is an indicator of company’s short-term liquidity. As Ford has the higher quick ratio over GM‚ it shows that Ford has more abilities to meet
Premium Balance sheet Financial ratios Asset
Accounting Reporting Criteria (GM and Toyota) Team B Megan Wooliver September 7‚ 2010 Accounting Reporting Criteria In order to keep up with the times most organizations of today are finding themselves consistently coming up with different ways to keep accounting information personal as well as accurate. Providing good accounting information not only leads to better decisions but also increase in profit. Even two different organizations that provide a similar product or service have
Premium Financial Accounting Standards Board Currency International Financial Reporting Standards