TABLE OF CONTENTS: I. Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………….1 II. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………2 III. Literature Review…………………………………………………………………………………4 IV. Methodology 1. Analytical Hierarchy Process……………………………………………………...6 2. Goal Programming……………………………………………………………………..8 3. Integrated Analytical Hierarchy Process - Goal Programming………9 V. Formulation 1. Deriving AHP weights………………………………………………………………10 2. Decision variables……………………………………………………………………13 3. Constrains………………………………………………………………………………14
Premium Decision theory Decision making software Decision making
Comfort Style Decision Alternatives: Car A Car B Car C 7 Pairwise Comparison Scale for AHP Preferences Verbal Judgment of Preference Extremely preferred Very strongly to extremely Very Strongly preferred Strongly to very strongly Strongly preferred Moderately to strongly Moderately preferred Equally to moderately Equally preferred Numerical Rating 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 Pairwise Comparison Matrix Comfort Car A Car B Car C Car A Car B 2 Car C 8 6 aii = 1 aji = Comfort
Premium Preference
scale refer to the example of temperature scales. However‚ some attitude scales such as the Likert and Semantic Differential‚ are claimed to approach interval characteristics. In addition‚ approximate interval scales can be developed from paired comparisons and rank orders of objects. A. Store customers Nominal - Group them by race‚ ethnic background‚ married or single status‚ etc. Ordinal - Rank them as very frequent buyers‚ frequent buyers‚ infrequent buyers. Interval - Some scale of attractiveness
Premium Psychometrics Preference Likert scale
Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips Betsy Sparrow‚1* Jenny Liu‚2 Daniel M. Wegner3 Department of Psychology‚ Columbia University‚ 1190 Amsterdam Avenue‚ New York‚ NY 10027‚ USA. 2Department of Psychology‚ University of Wisconsin–Madison‚ 1202 West Johnson Street‚ Madison‚ WI 53706‚ USA. 3Department of Psychology‚ Harvard University‚ 33 Kirkland Street‚ Cambridge‚ MA 02138‚ USA. *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sparrow@psych
Premium Preference Memory Hippocampus
Reyes is healthier than Mrs. Santos. 4. Jupiter is the largest planet in the Solar System. 5. My necklace is expensive. C. Abstraction Ask three pupils of different height to stand in front of the class. Describe their height using Degree of Comparison of regular verbs. Tall taller tallest (positive) (comparative) (superlative) 3 Degrees of Adjectives 1. Positive Degree describes a person‚ place‚ and things. 2. The Comparative Degree compares two persons‚ places‚ or things
Free Comparative
assumed to be at least as important as j)‚ give a value aij as follows: Value aij 1 3 5 7 9 Comparison Objectives i Objectives i Objectives i Objectives i Objectives i description and j are of equal importance is weakly more important that j is strongly more important that j is very strongly more important that j is absolutely more important that j Table 6.1: Pairwise comparison values Of course‚ we set aii = 1. Furthermore‚ if we set aij = k ‚ then we set aji = thinking hard
Free Decision making software Decision theory Decision making
Lesson Plan In English (The Degrees Of Comparison ) I. Objective *Use the positive‚ comparative and superlative degrees of regular and irregular adjectives *student should be able to create their own sentences using the degrees of comparison II. Subject Matter a. Focus skill: Degrees of comparison of adjectives b. Materials: pictures‚ charts‚ objects and persons to be compared‚ projector c. Reference: ( English Grammar reference book) III. Procedure A. Preliminary Activities 1. Spelling
Free Comparative Grammar
correctly. The students will be able to recognize serving size and servings per container The students will be able to understand daily value % Standards: Knowledge‚ access information Assessment: Nutrition label worksheet Activities: Powerpoint-Box cereal‚ can foods‚ worksheet Content Focus: Nutrition Label Materials: Powerpoint Work Sheet Boxed foods Canned foods Class#3 Objectives: The students will be able to define a food borne illness. The students will be able to describe
Premium Nutrition Food Health
Today’s lecture will be spent entirely in the computer lab. At the end of lab‚ submit this worksheet. Part 1: Weather (3) 1. Open the following link: http://climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climateData/canada_e.html 2. Click “customized search” button 3. Search by station name a. Enter “Hamilton” in the text field b. Years: 2006 to 2011 4. Click “Search” 5. For “Hamilton A” station‚ select ‘daily’ in the “data interval drop-down box. 6. Click “Go” You now have access
Premium Linear equation Regression analysis Statistics
This is sample of Scope and Limitation. This was used on a CASE STUDY entitled “Comparison and Contrast of sorting algorithm between Visual Basic.net and Java (Netbeans)”. This will help you to construct your own scope and limitation according to your study. This will serve only as your overview and guide for this part of case study. SAMPLE SCOPE AND LIMITATION: COMPARISON AND CONTRAST OF SORTING ALGORITHM BETWEEN VISUAL BASIC.NET AND JAVA (NETBEANS) Scope and Limitation Scope
Premium Programming language Algorithm Object-oriented programming