Not completed. Why Video Games Should Not Be Banned According to some people‚ they say that violent video games should be banned. They say that video games are the source of today’s violence. It is true but I disagree with them. Sometimes video games can make us learn stuff and it will do much harm to people who play them. First of all‚ they do a lot of destruction to people. If video games get banned‚ the videos that are on YouTube will have to get taken down. That means people whose YouTube
Premium United States Psychology Video game
Silence does not amount to misrepresentation‚ how if‚ it is to a known defects? Discuss by using case law to support your answer. Misrepresentation is defined as a false statement of existing facts or laws‚ which materially induces the misled party to enter into the contract. This is a pre-contractual statement‚ which is not part of the contract. However‚ these non-contractual statements can be classified as mere puffs (sales talk) or misrepresentations. For a misrepresentation to be actionable
Premium Complaint Legal terms Misrepresentation
This is a case about promises and accountability. It is not about opening the flood gates of liability for any social host who dares to have a party. The issue at hand is whether liability arises from two entirely separate sources of duty with the same set of facts. It can. Those who make promises should be held to account from those promises‚ whether or not someone had a beer to drink. Section 2.03(c) does not preclude Ms. Fleshman’s claim for negligent undertaking because section 2.03(3) applies
Premium Law Complaint Affirmative action
Damages “Damage” means the harm or loss suffered or presumed to be suffered by a person as a result of some wrongful act of another. The sum of money awarded by the court to compensate “damage” is called “damages”. There are two types of damages: compensatory and punitive. Compensatory damages are intended to compensate the injured party for his loss or injury. Punitive damages are awarded to punish a wrongdoer. Damages are also liquidated and unliquidated. Liquidated damages are those in which
Premium Tort Tort Pleading
The rule in Rylands and Fletcher Consider the potential liability in tort for the loss sustained by Paul in the situation above.How successful might any defences be? The tort in Rylands v Fletcher(1868) came into being as a result of the Industrial Revolution which took place during the eighteenth century.In Rylands v Fletcher(1868)‚ the defendant‚ a mill owner. Had paid independent contractors to make a reservoir on his land‚ which was intended to supply water to the mill.During the construction
Premium Nuisance Tort Rylands v Fletcher
This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285‚ White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton‚ xxxxx Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch‚ Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White. The defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern are seeking a summary judgment which is a procedural device used
Premium Plaintiff Judgment Civil procedure
It is the presence of consideration which distinguishes a contract from a bare agreement. In fact the doctrine of consideration has been incorporated in Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act. Section 2(d) of the Act reads : " When at the desire of the promisor ‚ the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing or promised to do or abstain from doing anything ‚ such act or abstinance or promise is called a consideration for the promise." The doctrine of course has its roots in the
Premium Contract Complaint
Name Geringer v. Wildhorn Ranch‚ Inc. 706 F.Supp. 1442 D.Colo. 1988. December 14‚ 1988 Procedural History: The mother and widow of deceased resort guests took an action against the resort‚ its owner‚ and others because these two deceased guests lost their lives in boating accident. Mr. Watters‚ defendant and the owner of the resort‚ brought an action against the verdict for revised decision because the trial court found him guilty. The case came in front of the court on action of defendants
Premium Plaintiff Court Jury
Law of Torts‚ MV Accident and Consumer Protection Laws II Interference with Goods TORTS RELATING TO MOVABLE PROPERTY o Torts affecting movable property are: § Trespass to goods‚ § Trespass ab initio‚ § Detention or detinue‚ § Conversion or trover. Copyright: Dr C J Rawandale‚ Associate Professor‚ SLS NOIDA 2013-14 2 a. TRESPASS TO GOODS o Technically‚ trespass to goods is known as “trespass de bonis asportatis”. o It means an unlawful disturbance of the possession of the goods by
Premium Property law Complaint Cause of action
Bruce v. Dyer: Case Presentation Exercise Style of Cause: Bruce v. Dyer. [1966] 2 O.R. 705. Procedural History: This case is the judgment in a matter brought to trial by Mr. Bruce as plaintiff against Dr. Dyer as defendant. Facts: The defendant attempted to pass the plaintiffs car on the highway several times‚ during which‚ the plaintiff prevented the defendant from re-entering the traffic lane by increasing his speed. After being followed for 16 km‚ the plaintiff stopped his car on the paved
Premium Legal terms Plaintiff Defendant