DISCOURSE AND GENRE: THE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE AND PATTERN OF JOURNAL ARTICLE IN CONAPLIN 6 I. INTRODUCTION The demand for scholars to publish journal-article is increased due to the need to develop education quality in Indonesia. In the era knowledge and globalization‚ the ability to write scientifically becomes very important. Therefore‚ the fact that the number of research papers emanating from universities in Indonesia is just a seventh of the total published by neighbouring Malaysia has
Premium Research Scientific method Qualitative research
whose premises‚ if true provide support for its conclusion. Deductive and inductive arguments are also distinguished based on the point that logical strength is a matter of degree. This distinction makes it necessary to understand the nature of deductive reasoning. Therefore‚ deductive arguments are those whose premises guarantee the truth of the conclusion‚ and inductive arguments are those whose premises make it reasonable to accept the conclusion though do not absolutely guarantee its truth. Deductive
Premium Logic Psychology Management
1. Denied. The allegations of Paragraph 1 are legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required‚ Unocal denies the allegations. By way of further response‚ for the reasons set forth in Unocal’s Preliminary Objections to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint‚ Unocal specifically denies that it is subject to personal jurisdiction in this
Premium Contract Law Contract law
COMM 105/106: INTRODUCTION/CONCLUSION SPEECH You will pick one topic‚ thesis and a set of mutually inclusive three main points appropriate for your classroom audience. For that‚ you will prepare three introductions that only need to differ with the opener. You will also prepare one conclusion for that same topic and thesis. INTRODUCTION: All three introductions should include: 1. Opener: A different one for each intro. 2. Establishment of the speech’s significance or relevance.
Premium Introduction Time 2005 albums
Scientific method is an epistemological system used by the scientists to investigate natural phenomena‚ developing new knowledge or correcting preceding knowledge (Jennings‚ 2008:5). It is considered the best objective framework to construct an accurate representation of the world‚ it include ideas‚ procedures‚ rules‚ techniques and modes which exist in theoretical research‚ applied research‚ development and promotion of scientific activities. This essay aim to prove that although the scientific
Premium Scientific method
critical questions to ask that are presented. The ten questions are: What are the issues and the conclusions?‚ What are the reasons?‚ Which words or phrases are ambiguous?‚ What are the value and descriptive assumptions?‚ Are there any fallacies in the reasoning?‚ How good is the evidence?‚ Are there rival causes?‚ Are the statistics deceptive?‚ What significant information is omitted?‚ What reasonable conclusions are possible? (Browne & Keeley‚ p. 9) After asking and evaluating each of these questions
Premium Critical thinking Reasoning Logic
dispute‚ in doubt‚ or simply "up for Review". LOGIC CRITICAL THINKING AN ISSUE PREMISE 3. Learning how to distinguish between good and bad arguments makes one a better global citizen. True False 4. Premises and conclusions are the same kind of statements. True False 5. Good reasoning is always fallacious reasoning. True False 6. When it comes to the intelligent evaluation of arguments‚ ignorance is bliss. True False 7. There
Premium Logic Reasoning Critical thinking
10. ’Through different methods of justification‚ we can reach conclusions in ethics that are as well-supported as those provided in mathematics.’ To what extent would you agree? One could argue that mathematics and ethics are the underlying essentials above which our society has based itself. Scores of cities have built their infrastructures using measurements and methods founded in mathematics. Our inherent ethical natures have catalyzed the great minds from ancient civilizations to create democracies
Premium Mathematics Pythagorean theorem Ethics
decide and categorize the question into one among three basic families of questions‚ and five or six question types. Step 2: Read the stimulus (the paragraph). Now‚ the stimulus can basically be broken down into two parts – the premises and the conclusion. Identify
Premium Question Logic Reasoning
questions (maximum of 1500 words): 1. In case of a personal dilemma from your own experience: a) Briefly describe the dilemma in about 200 words. b) Analyse the dilemma based on the 6-steps approach (below) and formulate your conclusion with respect to this dilemma. 2. In case you interview someone about a dilemma: a) Who did you interview (name and function)? b) Why did you choose this person for the interview? c) What kind of dilemma’s does this
Premium Logic Dilemma English-language films