on Milgram & Zimbardo and explain which study is the most useful in understanding human behaviour in a social situation (focusing on the methods used and findings obtained) and which study is the most unethical. The study of social psychology‚ particularly conformity‚ is very difficult to conduct both ethically and accurately in order to be able to obtain useful results. In the studies done by Milgram and Zimbardo‚ ethics were definitely breached but to what extent were these experiments useful
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology
Conclusion Shagun Mistry According to the experiment‚ the average normal heart rate of Daphnia is 20 heart beats per 12.94 seconds. There were six total trials done for Normal Heart Rate with 2 Daphnia (3 Trials each). The aim of this experiment was to measure the effect of neurotransmitters on the heart rate of Daphnia. When the adrenaline was added
Premium Heart rate Normal distribution Speed
Conclusion In the workshop‚ we are going to design a beam that will rupture when a load of 20 kg is placed at its mid-span region. We have made much consideration and preparation before the testing. At the beginning‚ we considered to use wood or plastic to make the beam. After observation and research‚ we find out that wood is more suitable for making a beam and more possible to rupture at 20 kg weight. With several trials‚ we discovered that the shape‚ length‚ width and thickness of the wooden board
Premium Wood Length Orders of magnitude
Stanley Milgram conducted an examination‚ in the 60’s‚ based on the justification for the acts of genocide offered by those who were accused in the Nuremberg War Criminal Trials of WWII. Their defense‚ as they claimed was solely based on “obedience” and that they were in fact only following their superior’s orders. This eventually led to the study on the conflict between obedience toward authority and one’s personal conscious. His experiment was a model of simplicity. The idea was to take an ‘experimenter’
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
Stanley Milgram’s Aims & Context 10.09.2014 Obedience is a direct social influence where a person complies with orders without questioning a person with perceived authority and does a task voluntarily. In the presence of a person of authority‚ the said person has an option of either complying with orders they are given or to disobey‚ and as consequences may be unknown if they do not follow what they are asked to do‚ fear of punishment may influence the person to then respond by submitting
Premium Adolf Eichmann The Holocaust Social psychology
Stanley Milgram was a psychologist at the University of Yale. Milgram decided to conduct an experiment that would focus on the conflict between authority and a person’s personal conscience. Milgram did this study to find the meaning and a new understanding of the acts of the people that occurred during World War II. Milgram wanted to figure out if the Germans were particularly obedient toward authoritative figures. He was eager to find out just how far people would be willing to go in order to obey
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
situations. The results of the Milgram‚ Asch‚ and Zimbardo studies can teach us to avoid abuses of power in the future. The first study discussed was conducted by Stanley Milgram‚ and it looked at how far a participant would go in hurting another human when told to do so by the researcher in charge. Sometimes subjects gave what was supposed to be a potentially lethal jolt of electricity when told to by the researcher. The lesson that can be gained from this experiment is that people will follow directions
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology
I think the Milgram and Zimbardo’s results is a good theory for the Holocaust. When the two‚ Instructor and Student‚ were in role play for every wrong answer the instructor would shock the student. At times when the instructor would say‚ “I don’t want to do this” or “I can’t do this” shows he does have a consequence‚ but he continued to still push the trigger. Although it was just an actor playing the role and no one was being shocked it is terrible to see how he continued to go on with the test
Premium Morality Jury Thought
The Art of the Conclusion The conclusion of an essay should establish a sense of closure or completeness that leaves the reader with lingering thoughts about the topic. Each writer has their own approach in composing a conclusion that they feel solidifies their argument; every approach makes different demands of a reader because of the moves the writer chooses to make. The essays “How to Tame a Wild Tongue” by Gloria Anzaldua‚ “Translating Translation” by Alberto Alvaro Rios‚ and “Joyas Voladoras”
Premium Writing Essay
could help people. This could also help with learning new things. Listening to their opinion of their argument can even change the earlier opinions someone had. Seeing from another person’s point of view can help people with thoughts‚ understanding‚ conclusion. Someone’s point of view can make people’s thoughts work more. Trying to see from someone’s view will make people think of different ways to view what the other person sees. The thoughts would be why‚ when and where. With so many thoughts someone
Free Psychology Knowledge Cognition