Consequentialism is such a theory in which “An action is permissible if an only if it has the best consequences.” Consequentialism states a connection between permissibility and value: producing the best consequences is what makes an action permissible. So‚ according to consequentialism‚ rightness depends on goodness. Suppose there is a situation in which one could perform only one of three alternatives action: X‚ Y‚ and Z. If performing either X or Y results will be equally good but that performing
Premium Ethics Utilitarianism Morality
Intro to Ethics Paper #2 Deontology vs. Consequentialism Even though Deontology and Consequentialism can be extremely similar‚ both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different. Sometimes‚ it may appear that both these theories simply arrive at the same conclusion by way of different paths. While this is sometimes true‚ it is important to understand how these theories differ. Each of these braches of Ethics deals with morals‚ actions‚ ethical decisions and judgments. Beyond
Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant
Abortion Abortion is quite a controversial issue in today’s government. Many of us refrain from even getting into a discussion over abortion‚ because it is such a sensitive topic. It is very unfortunate that so many women around the world have to make decisions involving abortion‚ period. “One in three women will have at least one abortion by the time she is 45‚ and these run the gamut of ages‚ races‚ backgrounds and beliefs.” (Welch) In one’s eye abortion is simply immoral and unacceptable‚
Premium Abortion Reproductive rights Birth control
Consequentialism By Jeremy Ciolli University of the People For this paper I choose the topic of consequentialism. Consequentialism is the subject of this study that I felt I most related to and was true for me. In this paper I will explain what it is‚ why I relate to it‚ and why I feel it is incomplete. Consequentialism is the subject in morality of weighing the consequences of your actions by the outcomes it will effect. You tally up the consequences and if they are more right or
Premium
In the chapter Consequentialism and Utilitarianism in the book Global Ethics an Introduction by Heather Widdows explains that Utilitarianism is the ethical rule that is based on the idea of happiness. (Widdows 45) After reading the case study Buying and Selling Body Parts‚ it has been determined that buying and selling body parts can viewed as unethical in some cultures while some cultures view this the process of buying and selling body parts as acceptable in certain cultures. In this analysis will
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Morality
These arguments are raised in two different approaches‚ which are consequentialist and non-consequentialist. Consequentialist is considered utilitarianism and the non-consequentialist as deontology that differs in their views. Consequentialism is all about the ‘actions of consequences‚’ which are based on justification. The people that favored affirmative action for consequences‚ for them it works until it produces the greatest happiness for the largest number of individuals. ‘Utilitarianism
Premium Utilitarianism Consequentialism Affirmative action
Major ethical dilemmas require sound principles of moral understanding in order to act accordingly. Two major views on moral stance are the ethical principles of consequentialism and the commonly contrasted non-consequentialist view. This paper will try to present a fictional ethical dilemma which stresses these two major views and exposes the strengths and weaknesses of both views. The “Trolley Problem” is a short video published by BBCradiofour which depicts an ethical dilemma with three possible
Premium Ethics Morality Paradox
Law and Ethics essay For the purpose of this assignment I will look at the legal and ethical aspects involved in the following scenario and this will be discussed. I will take into consideration both the deontological and consequentialism theory. Laws relevant to this scenario will be looked at. Scenario To maintain confidentiality the name of the patient has been changed. The patient D is 60 years old male who had kidney cancer he had been admitted to the hospital for further treatment. On
Premium Ethics Physician Patient
Consequences of Climate Change: Consequentialism and Environmental Ethics A somewhat commonly held concern is that consequentialism is an inadequate moral theory for tackling the issue of climate change. In this paper I will argue that consequentialism can successfully respond to climate change by‚ at times‚ evaluating the morality of character traits instead of actions. First‚ I will provide a couple major objections that consequentialism must overcome if it is to be successful in addressing the
Premium Climate change Climate Natural environment
Williams’ main critique of consequentialism is that it is too demanding. Moreover‚ Williams thinks that consequentialism is self-defeating‚ since its “teleological maximizing structure actually destroys a primary source of value in rational human life” (Powerpoint). This is because in consequentialism‚ we care only about maximizing the good and minimizing the bad‚ and not about how this is accomplished. And because of this‚ argues Williams‚ consequentialism destroys personal integrity‚ which plays
Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant