2004). The following treatise will identify‚ compare‚ and contrast three approaches to making ethical decisions within an educational institution: consequentialism‚ mixed-consequentialism‚ and deontologism. These three approaches to ethical decision-making‚ present a method for differentiating between right and wrong actions (Odell‚ 2001). Consequentialism In consideration of the consequential approach‚ individuals should do whatever brings about the best results in a situation. This idea relates
Premium Ethics Morality
maximizes utility. Utility measures amounts of happiness. Another example is consequentialism. It is the belief that all acts should have maximally good consequences. When making choices‚ a human should always measures the good consequences that would come about from the action. These actions can be measured by a multiple number of things such as religion‚ happiness‚ flattery‚ pleasure‚ etc. The basic idea behind consequentialism is the question of who would want to do anything else besides produces the
Premium Morality Ethics Philosophy
In this essay I argue that the moral theory consequentialism is a far better solution to the case with ‘Jim and the Indians’ rather than the deontology. I shall begin by describing the case of ‘Jim and the Indians’ and will then continue by briefly defining each moral theory that can be used in this philosophical question. Throughout my essay I shall argue on why consequentialism is far superior to deontology in the difficult decisions that Jim will face. Jim has found himself in quite the predicament
Premium Morality Ethics Utilitarianism
In Defense of Deontology (Non-Consequentialism) Consequentialism and deontology are two different theories concerning with morality. Consequentialism believes in the concept of the ends justifies the means. On the other hand‚ deontology does not believe in this concept. It believes that right actions are defined by duty. Deontology is the opposite of consequentialism when it comes to moral ethics‚ making it the better approach. Deontology is a non-consequentialist theory. Deontologists claim that
Premium Ethics
about this do you find plausible or implausible? When it comes to making ethical decisions‚ consequentialism prioritizes the maximization of good outcomes as the basis for moral justification. Within this ethical concept‚ the evaluation of policies such as Policy 1‚ which involves empowering the police/military to establish a safer community‚ becomes significant. Act consequentialism is a form of consequentialism that influences peoples’ decisions by ranking consequences of an act from best to worst
Premium
that result in it being the bioethical dilemma or is the morality of the issue influenced by the intent behind the act. The complexities can be explored through the application of the three normative ethic theories: Deontology‚ Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism. Deontological ethics judges the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to the rules and that the motive is the deciding factor of right or wrong. In contrast‚ consequentialists hold the rightness or wrongness of an act
Premium Ethics
system in the United States. Through capital punishment’s determent process‚ I feel it is a necessary and effective tool in implementing a type of ultimatum to basic life in our legal system. The ethical theory of consequentialism is often referred with capital punishment. Consequentialism mainly points out the benefits of the death penalty to society‚ like deterrence. Van den Haag begins his argument for the use of the death penalty by talking about how it is distributed throughout society. He
Premium Capital punishment Crime Murder
|Online‚ “is a doctrine that the |2011). |behavior‚ rather than rules or | | |useful is the good and that the | |consequentialism‚ which derives rightness or| | |determining consideration of right| |wrongness from the outcome of the act itself| | |conduct should be the
Premium Ethics Virtue ethics Deontological ethics
discussed in Chapter 2 of Ian Kerridge‚ Michael Lowe‚ Cameron Stewart. Ethics and Law for the Health Professions‚ 4th Edition‚ 2013: Federation Press. do you consider most plausible? Why? It can be argued that the most plausible theory is that of consequentialism‚ which defines the righteousness of an action via its consequences. Through evaluating all the possible actions that can be undertaken in a given situation and their corresponding outcomes‚ consequentialists aim to choose those that equally cater
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
One of Bostrom’s earlier philosophies was his philosophy on existential risk. This philosophy described an important aspect of Bostrom’s concerns which would be the future of the human race. Here Nick Bostrom introduced the concept of an event or outcome that would annihilate Earth or significantly reduce the human race’s potential for growth on a global scale‚ basically sending us back into a primitive state due to the amount of destruction. Nick Bostrom categories risks according to their intensity
Premium Human Psychology Science