with the capacity to choose between keeping the trolley on the main line (thus killing five people)‚ or steering it onto the spur track (and killing one person)? Under a deontological approach‚ it is morally wrong to kill anyone. Therefore‚ killing one person to save the lives of five people is not an option. Under a deontological perspective‚ there is a duty to help and not to harm others. But‚ the duty not to harm others is stronger. Harming someone is deemed wrong regardless of the consequences
Premium Ethics Morality Logic
QUESTION 1; Utilitarianism - Consequentialist Analysis (effect on four stakeholders) Cocoa Bean Farmers – Should the chocolate manufacturers decide to refrain from using the cocoa beans harvested by enslaved children‚ the farmers would immediately lose significant portions of their revenue. The farmers however would also be forced to stop using enslaved children and would instead have to hire a legitimate staff‚ which would increase costs. In perpetuity‚ this may cause the farms to go out of business
Premium Cocoa bean Ghana Africa
figure out what is best for all of humanity and only we can therefore discern how to preserve the needs of other humans because of our logical thought processes. In regards to the maxim within deontological ethics‚ a maxim is a thought process derived from rationality described within Kant’s deontological ethics. The process begins with the action‚ next the situation in which the action is to be completed‚ and finally the outcome achieved by the action. From Kant’s ideas it can be implied that he
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Hedonism
will‚ which is the only intrinsic good. Therefore‚ Shelia’s duty should not be “actions motivated by desires/emotions are self-interested” because if they were motivated by desire they would “not deserve praise” (Garcia‚ Slide 11). Following the deontological theory in Shelia’s perspective you have to start by creating a maxim. The maxim in the situation would be‚ I will commit murder when doing so will allow me to feed my desires in order to promote my personal well-being. To check the maxim‚ we have
Premium American films English-language films KILL
true (279). There happen to be three primary theories that explain morality and they all answer the same questions: what is good‚ why is it good‚ and where is the good located (280). The theories that answer these questions are the teleological‚ deontological‚ and virtue-based theory. These theories answer the same questions nevertheless they don’t answer them the same way. White believes that humans remain notoriously fickle with the
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
rules and beliefs that we have adapted to‚ some of these beliefs are known as ethics. Ethics is what we know of what is right and wrong in life. There exists several types of ethics beliefs but in this case the Virtue Theory‚ Utilitarianism‚ and Deontological theories will be described and compared because each one of these ethics has many differences. Virtue Theory The Virtue Theory is known as virtue of ethics‚ in this theory the focus is on a person characteristics instead of rules or consequences
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
If I subscribe to the deontological theory of thought‚ the answer is a resounding no! According to Geuras and Garofalo (2011)‚ “...deontological ethical theory is one which maintains that the ethics of an action does not depend on the consequences‚ but upon an important feature of the act itself. ...that feature is the obedience of
Premium Morality Ethics
| Legal Ethics from Deontological‚ Utilitarian and Casuistry Perspectives | | | | | | Deontological ethics are concerned with the intent of an action without regard to the outcome‚ while utilitarian ethics are concerned only with the consequences of the action. Some argue that the legal code of ethics is derived from a utilitarian theory‚ while others argue that it is derived from deontological theory. As deontological ethics are the polar opposite of utilitarian ethics‚ it
Premium Ethics Morality
Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. A consequentialist principle holds that whether an act is right or wrong depends on the results of that act. It holds that the more good consequences an act produces‚ the better or right that act. The consequentialist view is that an act can be bad because it has a bad outcome for someone or bad consequences. This principle gives us the guidance when faced with a moral dilemma such as when
Premium Ethics Utilitarianism Morality
tutorial on criminal justice ethics‚ the detective’s failure to comply with department policies and rules was the determining factor in deciding to report the incident to my supervisor. To help justify by decision‚ I viewed the situation from a deontological perspective. Deontologists argue that sometimes people have a moral duty to perform certain actions
Premium Police Law Crime