late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries‚ the expansion of the United States continued as it had in the past and evolved to be more efficient. As in the past‚ United States expansionism continued through motives of religion‚ questioning of constitutionality‚ and remained the same in the way we treated natives of our newly attained territories; however‚ United
Premium United States Native Americans in the United States North America
Does the decision of the Supreme Court in Cityview Press v. An Comhairle Oiliuna [1980] IR 381 (and ensuing case-law) have any enduring relevance in a modern regulatory society? A study into the case of Cityview Press v. An Comhairle Oiliuna highlights the difficulties enshrined in delegated legislation and the problems associated with it and the matters of conflict in create in relation to the Irish Constitution. Article 15.2 establishes the position of the Constitution in relation
Premium Law Legislature Delegated legislation
Marbury v Madison 1803 Background information: -‐ -‐ I: R: Case founded the principle of judicial review‚ i.e. the capacity of the Supreme Court to review law for constitutionality (=extension of power of judiciary) Facts: Outgoing president Adams appoints justices as his last order. Appointments are approved by senate‚ but secretary of state Marshall (who later becomes chief justice) does not deliver them in time. New president Jefferson
Premium Law Common law
conclusion‚ the Alien and Sedition Acts were pushed by a federalist administration that was keen on minimizing immigrant support for the republican side. The reason informing the law was by itself a major debate issue. Other issues included their constitutionality‚ whether they were right or wrong‚ as well as whether limitation of speech could ever be justified. While the federalist administration argued that the legislations were best for the nation‚ the democratic republican opposition thought that everything
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Sedition James Madison
FINAL RESEARCH PAPER THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA: PROPOSALS FOR LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM Abstract: This paper deals with the role of the Constitutional court of the Republic of Macedonia in building constitutionalism. For that purpose‚ the concept of constitutionalism and two competences of the Constitutional court are analyzed: judicial review and the competence to decide on demands for protection of some rights (quasi-constitutional complaint)
Premium Law Constitution
the principles of popular sovereignty. For this reason‚ the ambitProf Amar of the judiciary’s expressed powers is more constrained than the legislature’s. Given this constraint‚ the judiciary can assert power over the legislature to determine constitutionality. The legislature
Premium Law United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
The law of the land recognizes the authority of states to license marriage. The majority of states‚ including Indiana‚ provide a marriage license only to a man and woman while nine states also allow same-sex couples to receive a license to marry. Congress passed the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996 that defines marriage as the legal union of one man and one woman for purposes of federal benefits. Under DOMA‚ states with the traditional definition of marriage need not recognize same-sex marriages
Premium Same-sex marriage Marriage Homosexuality
and social management‚ they continue to be the subject of debate by some non-government organizations who are questioning the compatibility of extraction and utilization of minerals with sustainable development. Also‚ they have questioned the constitutionality of the major provisions of the Mining Act governing the participation of foreign-owned corporations in the exploration‚ development and utilization of these mineral resources by filing a case at the Supreme Court in February‚ 1997. After eight
Premium Supreme court Economy Sustainability
Prepare written responses to the following questions and case problems from the Clarkson‚ Miller & Cross textbook; 1. Question & Case Problem #1-9 parts a-e (p. 27) a) In the lawsuit in which Arthur Rabe is suing Xavier Sanchez for breaching a contract in which Sanchez promised to sell Rabe a Van Gogh painting for $3 million Arthur Rabe is the Plaintiff and Xavier Sanchez is the Defendant. b) If Rabe wants Sanchez to perform the contract as promised‚ the remedy Rabe would be seeking from court
Premium Law Judicial remedies Injunction
Levin acknowledges this when he writes‚ “Torturing the terrorist is unconstitutional? Probably. But millions of lives surely outweigh constitutionality” (532). Basically‚ Levin admits that the methods of torture may not be legal and civilized‚ but he still promotes its use because the lives of innocent people has more value than rules and regulations. The Constitution is only a guideline and
Premium Crime Capital punishment Murder