Cited: Lunder‚ Erika K.‚ and Jennifer Staman. "NFIB v. Sebelius: Constitutionality of the Individual Mandate." Congressional Research Service‚ 3 Sept. 2012. Web. 24 Oct. 2012. . National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. 567 U.S. ___ . The Supreme Court of the United States. 2012. Print.
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States Congress
Some consider Dred Scott not a citizen. The question has also been raised about the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise and whether it not infringes on an individual’s right to protect property which is written in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. What is considered a man or “men” in the Declaration of Independence is questioned
Premium Slavery in the United States American Civil War Slavery
In a political atmosphere where homosexuality has become trendy‚ and those opposing it citing religious freedom are criticized‚ a debate has arisen between parties both for and against this exercise of religious freedom. Issues stem from the applications of personal religious freedom and their applications to business. This position has become increasingly difficult for courts to rule on‚ especially given the supreme court ruling on the legalization of same sex marriage which pushed this debate
Premium Discrimination First Amendment to the United States Constitution United States
The Affordable Care Act Yixing Li Florida International University BUL6810: The Legal Environment of Business Copyright 2014 Yixing Li Introduction of my paper My article‚ which is based on the Affordable Care Act‚ analyzes five provisions‚ three regulations‚ and two the most important cases‚ including Burwell v. Hobby Lobby and the National Federation of Business v. Sebelius‚ to explain my understanding of the ACA. I really believe that the ACA is helpful to improve the environment of health
Premium Health insurance Health care Health
ExceptionToRuleOFLaw The above rule of equality is however not an absolute rule and there are number exception to it v ‘Equality of Law’ does not mean the power of the private citizens are the same as the power of the public officials. Thus a police officer has the power to arrest you while no other private person has this power. This is not violation of rule of law. But rule of law does require that these powers should be clearly defined by law and that abuse of authority by public officers must
Premium Law Pension Retirement
How many of you currently have your driver’s license? That means that all of you that raised your hand are either currently under or have been under the sixth month Georgia driving rule. This drivers rule states that a class D license holder is not to drive between the hours of midnight and 5:00am (“Teen Driving Laws”). This strict law also dictates that‚ for the first six months‚ a class D license holder may not have more than one passenger in the car (“Teen Driving Laws”). This single passenger
Premium Crime Law Gun
Joey Calhoun T. Johnson Political Science 10 7 November 2013 Give Me Liberty…or Give Me Guns “A free people ought to be armed.” –George Washington Life‚ Liberty‚ and the Pursuit of Happiness. These are just a few of our “certain unalienable rights” that we are entitled to‚ not only as Americans‚ but as human beings. When the Founding Fathers set out to create a new country‚ they were convinced that all men were created
Premium United States United States Declaration of Independence Law
For the history and implementation of affirmative action in the U.S.‚ see Affirmative action in the United States. Affirmative action ‚ known as positive discrimination in the United Kingdom ‚ refers to policies that take factors including "race‚ color‚ religion‚ gender‚ sexual orientation‚ or national origin" [1] into consideration in order to benefit an underrepresented group "in areas of employment‚ education‚ and business". [2] Origins The term "affirmative action" was first used in the
Premium Affirmative action Minority group Discrimination
Economy. West Port‚ CT: Greenwood Press‚ 1999. Markham‚ Jerry. A Financial History of the United States Volume 1 From Christopher Columbus to the Robber Barons (1492-1900). Armonk‚ NY: M.E. Sharp Inc.‚ 2004. Thomas Jefferson‚ Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank‚ February 15‚ 1791 Samuelson‚ Paul and Krooss‚ Herman‚ Documentary History of Banking and Currency in the United States (Boston‚ MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s‚ 2000.) 50 [ 2 ] [ 5 ]. Thomas J. DiLorenzo‚ Central Banking as an Engine
Premium Central bank Thomas Jefferson Money supply
The 1965 Enactment By 1965 concerted efforts to break the grip of state disfranchisement had been under way for some time‚ but had achieved only modest success overall and in some areas had proved almost entirely ineffectual. The murder of voting-rights activists in Philadelphia‚ Mississippi‚ gained national attention‚ along with numerous other acts of violence and terrorism. Finally‚ the unprovoked attack on March 7‚ 1965‚ by state troopers on peaceful marchers crossing the Edmund Pettus Bridge
Premium Voting Rights Act United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution