QUESTION Running late for his exciting evening law class‚ Sam desperately seeks out a car park in the CBD of Melbourne‚ state of Victoria Australia. He spots the car park operated by Citipark Ltd. Sam drives up a ramp which has raised concrete barriers on either side. As it is rush hour‚ there are a few cars in front of him and soon some more line up behind him. Sam stopped his car at the barrier entrance of the car park which had a mechanical arm preventing cars moving into the parking
Premium Parking Parking lot Parking space
discuss whether Australian contract law should (or should not) provide greater clarity as to what is (or is not) sufficient consideration. ESSAY STRUCTURE : INTRODUCTION BODY CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY Minimum 12
Premium Logic Law Common law
CONTRACTS CONTRACT a meeting of minds between 2 persons whereby one binds himself‚ with respect to the other‚ to give something or to render some service (ARTICLE 1305) GENERAL PROVISIONS (Arts. 1305-1317) Distinguish an ordinary Contract: a.) from a Contract of marriage b.) from an obligation c.) from an imperfect promise d.) from a pact e.) from a stipulation a.) from a Contract of marriage ORDINARY CONTRACT 1. The parties may be 2 or more persons of same or different genders
Premium Contract
Contract with Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd IMPORTANT NOTICE / DISCLAIMER This Contract is fictitious and prepared for the study purpose of the students of IIT Delhi. It does not have any legal authenticity and is not valid in the court of law or any part of India. Memorandum of Understanding This Memorandum of Understanding is executed at Ahmedabad on this 16.05.2016 by and between Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd.‚ a private limited company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act‚
Premium Gentlemen's agreement Contract United Breweries Group
the defendants under the notion that they violated a covenant in their employee contracts. If the defendants were to be found guilty then the consequences would be an oppressive and unfair scenario. Therefore‚ the motion for preliminary injunction was denied in favor of the defendants. Facts: The defendants‚ upon being hired by Russell‚ entered into contracts which contained three relevant covenants in this case; not to compete with the plaintiffs‚ not to solicit the plaintiff’ customers‚ and
Premium Legal terms Defendant Plaintiff
consideration‚ in the sense of law‚ may consist either in some right‚ interest‚ profit or benefit accruing to the one party or some forbearance‚ detriment‚ loss or responsibility‚ given‚ suffered or undertaken by the other”. In relation to Rent a Tents contract with Susie the terms of the contract are that in return for Rent a Tent providing a marquee for the birthday weekend Susie will pay £2‚000. This is a binding contract as the several requirements to make a binding contract are‚ offer and acceptance
Premium Contract Contract law
The Current “Age of Accountability” Law in Light of Developmental Psychology Current Law Upheld Case Study Cassondra Winfrey May 24‚ 2011 In the case study provided‚ one can see many areas where the development of the child in question can be taken into consideration when looking at the case from a law standpoint. In any case involving children‚ one must always take into account their environment‚ their developmental age‚ and their true age. With each age group‚ there is a norm for development
Premium Law Childhood The Child
wider than is necessary to protect the legitimate interest of the employer. Attempting to stifle competition is impermissible and it is irrelevant that the employer taught the ex-employee everything he knows. The court area particular to prevent contracts‚ which seek to prevent an employee from practicing his livelihood. The courts have regard to three facts: - The period during which the restriction purports to apply. - The geographical area in which the restriction purports to apply. - The scope
Premium Contract Contract law
Consider whether the current law in Australia in relation to pickets is too harsh. Introduction The power dynamic within employment relationships has a direct bearing‚ and often can be decisive in the outcomes of industrial disputes. Indeed‚ the ability of employees to effectively negotiate agreeable working conditions is dependent upon their actual or perceived ability to withdraw their labour. A powerful form of industrial protest available to employees and trade unions is the picket line. This
Premium Trade union Employment Collective bargaining
incidents‚ Lowell Wilson‚ the superintendent at Greif Brothers’ Youngstown plant‚ decided to hire a security company to guard Greif Brothers’ property. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO In April 1987‚ Wilson‚ on behalf of Greif Brothers‚ entered into a contract with Youngstown Security Patrol‚ Inc. (“YSP”) to supply a uniformed security guard to “deter theft [and] vandalism” on Greif Brothers’ property during specified hours. Wilson told YSP’s owner and president‚ Carl Testa‚ that he wanted the security
Premium Security guard