1.) In this week’s case study‚ two companies were shown to enable smartphone utilization to increase profits. The companies were able to reduce time spent managing resources‚ reduce man-hours both traveling to work sites and performing the job function‚ and improve overall quality of work. These improvements increased profitability by costing the companies less in man-hours‚ allowing them to downsize positions‚ and increasing the quality of the work to better service customers. The improvements
Premium Mobile phone Marketing Customer service
their ordinary‚ dictionary meaning‚ with no exceptions. Lord Esher stated in R v Judge of the City of London Court (1892) that this should be done even if it leads to a ’manifest absurdity’. Judges who follow this rule‚ only apply the law and do not try to interpret the law. Advantages • Provides the will of parliament • Maintains the separation of powers • Encourages consistency Disadvantages • Harsh results • Absurd results • Rigid/ mechanical • Defeats parliaments intentions - Whiteley
Premium Marriage Parliament
McCormick v Nowland (1985) ATPR 40-852 This case is to be contrasted with McCormick v Nowland (1985) ATPR 40-852 in which the vendor’s real estate agent falsely represented that the vendor’s house was made of brick and that the swimming pool in the back yard was adjacent to a public park. The Court here held that a real estate agent owes a duty of care to a purchaser with respect to the information supplied about the property. Pincus J found that the agent had been negligent in respect of the
Premium Real estate Law Common law
“self-protection”‚ is carefully reviewed by assigned third party arbitrator. It is understood that any claim of medical malpractice‚ including any claims from Nittany Regional Medical center‚ arbitration party has carefully reviewed of legal laws and previous similar cases prior to binding this arbitration clause. The Arbitration party has concluded that suspension of Mr. Kevin Hyer was not fair‚ therefor we have come up with that suspension of Mr. Kevin Hyper shall be removed from his record and Nittany
Premium Nursing Arbitration
fire department cannot chose which buildings that they will respond to in an emergency. Responders may be called to buildings that are under construction‚ under demolition‚ or under renovation. These buildings bring with them their own safety concerns that may not be as common as a building that is under normal use. Buildings that are under construction are usually more hazardous than a completed structure (Brannigan & Corbett‚ 2015). These buildings fire protection features have not yet been
Premium Occupational safety and health Construction Building
In this case study‚ Patina is the seller and Luca is the buyer under an FOB (Free on Board) agreement. General picture of a FOB contract can be congregated from the case of Wimble & Sons v Rosenberg & Sons which describes it as a contract for the sale of goods where the seller which in this case is Patina who agrees to deliver the goods over the ship’s rail and the buyer or Luca in this stance agrees to convey it overseas. According to English law‚ the case of Pyrene v Scindia defines a classic FOB
Premium Contract Breach of contract International trade
$266‚390) involving our Public Auto XOL contract effective 01/01/13. Our current o/s reserve is $1‚451‚950‚ an increase of $35‚558 in the loss adjustment expense is required‚ which will increase our total incurred to $1‚491‚390. The required pay time form has been tasked to K. Haniff. IAT issued a commercial auto policy effective 10/01/13 – 10/01/14 with limits of $5‚000‚000‚ the date of loss is 07/11/14 falling within the ceded policy term. Our contract period is 01/01/13 – 12/31/13 accepting
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Investment Driving under the influence
By use of examples‚ explain how an agreement recognized by the law of contract Law of contract is body of legal rules governing the conclusion and consequences of contract. Contract is an agreement based on consensus between legal subjects with contractual capacity. Which is legal‚ physically possible and complies with the prescribed formalities and which is reached with the intension of creating a legal obligation with resultant rights and duties? 1. Consideration It’s the price paid by
Premium Contract Law Gentlemen's agreement
Arizona v. United States is whether federal immigration laws preclude Arizona’s cooperative law enforcement efforts and implicitly preempt provisions of Arizona’s immigration law (S.B. 1070). My team and I believe that S.B. 1070 violates the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution‚ which makes federal law the “supreme law of the land.” As such‚ S.B. 1070 unconstitutionally intrudes on the federal government’s authority to regulate immigration law and should therefore be nullified. Defining Preemption
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
physician ownership‚ Medicare cases‚ and even out of network waivers. A surgical center takes a lot of endeavor in running a surgical center as well as learning what type of legal issues might be included when running this type of a center. Legal Concerns A main concern that is a prevalent legal debate in an ambulatory surgery center is when an owner is getting out of the business and a new owner is going to “buy-out” that owner. Many centers struggle with their current contracts regarding buying as well
Premium Ambulatory surgery center Hospital Physician