Currently‚ majority of people do not know much about contract law. Actually‚ we are signing contracts everyday. For example: Buying candies in a shop. There are two types of contract (written and verbal agreement). A contract is made by orally‚ by conduct and in writing. It also consists of an agreement‚ consideration and legally binding. There are eight elements of contract law‚ namely offer‚ acceptance‚ consideration‚ capacity‚ legal relations‚ legality and agreement. In this essay‚ I am going
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance Invitation to treat
------------------------------------------------- Foss v Harbottle Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189 is a leading English precedent in corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company‚ the proper claimant is the company itself. This is known as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle"‚ and the several important exceptions that have been developed are often described as "exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle". Amongst these is the ’derivative action’‚ which allows
Premium Pleading Plaintiff Corporation
Equal Inclusion Case Law AED/204 July 26‚ 2013 Vicki Kugel-Brandt Equal Inclusion Case Law In the earlier days women and African Americans had no rights to school‚ work or any other type of socialization. They were brought into slavery‚ housewives and had no rights as an individual. This included people with disabilities (even those with MMR classification) because they were‚ “viewed as nonproductive and expandable.” (Gollnick & Chinn‚ pg. 181‚ 2013) The rights we have today as women
Premium Plessy v. Ferguson Brown v. Board of Education Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
current BCA‚ all new homes in Australia (except New South Wales) are to be designed to be rated at 6 stars for thermal efficiency. A BCA Section J Report is required by local councils and building authorities when applying for a building permit or Construction Certificate (CC). The
Premium Building Construction Renewable energy
SALES CONTRACT No.57/2014 Ho Chi Minh City‚ May 19th‚ 2014 The Seller: Dalat Agriculture and Forestry JSC‚ Vietnam Address: 39 Phu Dong Thien Vuong Street‚ Ward 8‚ Da Lat City‚ Lam Dong‚ Vietnam Telephone: +84-63-656565 Fax: +84-63-665442 Email: info@dalatgap.com Represented by: Mr. Tran Thanh Sang Position: Director The Buyer: Shoei Foods Corporation Address: Shoei Bldg‚ 5-7‚ Akihabara‚ Taito-ku‚Tokyo‚ Japan Telephone: +81-33-2342345 Fax: +81-33-2672634 Email: shoeifoods@Shoeifoods
Premium Contract Ho Chi Minh Contract law
Issue The challenge in this case is to make a decision whether the book written by David is legitimately legal does not against the copyright of earlier published articles‚ or it is classified as an infringement work that copy the existed paper. Rules This particular case concerns about intellectual property law that emphasize on copyright law protection. Copyright is the exclusive rights to protect the original work from copied by the other people. The law of copyright does protect the expression
Premium Property Copyright Intellectual property
The preliminary issue in the question is fast food restaurant is vicariously liable for the Cathy’s negligence. Since the concerns about the law of tort‚ the following analysis will focus on the possible tortuous liability instead of the potential breach of the contractual obligation and the criminal acts. In principle of vicarious liability‚ to make an employer liable for a wrong committed by an employee‚ the plaintiff must establish that: 1. defendant is an employee ( as opposed to an independent
Premium Tort law Employment Vicarious liability
provisions in the contract for sick or holiday pay. Held that she was an employee‚ the degree of control was enough to be that of a contract of service. Nethermere v Gardener Held‚ He was an employee‚ there was a iriduceable mutual obligation between the parties‚ the employee was paid for the work‚ and obligied to apply his own skill in the performance of a service. The fact that he worked from home and could arrange his own holiday was not enough to nullify the contract. O’Kelly v Trusthouse
Premium Employment
distinguished from offers because they contain no demonstration of present intent to form contractual relations. No contract is formed when prospective purchasers respond to such terms‚ as they are merely invitations or requests for an offer. Unless this interpretation is employed‚ any person in a position similar to a seller who advertises goods in any medium would be liable for numerous contracts when there is usually a limited quantity of merchandise for sale. An advertisement‚ price quotation‚ or catalogue
Premium Contract
MALAYSIAN LAW OF CONTRACT Select a hire purchase contract and compare the contract with a normal contract. By AhmadRawi The writer can be contacted at scholars.assist@gmail.com By AhmadRawi The writer can be contacted at scholars.assist@gmail.com INTRODUCTION A contract is an agreement between two or more persons (individuals‚ businesses‚ organizations‚ or government agencies) to do‚ or to refrain from doing‚ a particular thing in exchange for something of value. Contracts can
Premium Contract Contract law Breach of contract