Chapter 7 the terms of the contract 1. When contract is made orally‚ not all oral statement will amount to a term some are just ‘mere puffs’. These statements will never provide any form of remedy. 2. Mere puff只是单纯的吹嘘，是一种statement of opinion‚ 不构成任何的representation或term 3. 三种不同的terms：conditions‚ warranties‚ and innominate terms * CONDITIONS: important terms form the main structure of the contract. If breach‚ repudiate the contract and claim the damage * WARRANTIES: minor terms ancillary(辅助)
Premium Contract law Contract Contractual term
Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker. The parties did have a contract for exclusive negotiation rights as stated in the case scenario. Big Time Toymaker (BTT) paid Chou $25‚000 for a 90-day period of exclusivity‚ thus prohibiting Chou from soliciting or entertaining offers from other parties. The agreement stipulated that unless it was written no distribution contract existed. Prior to the 90-days elapsing‚ the parties reached an oral agreement and BTT sent Chou an e-mail titled “Strat Deal” covering
Premium Contract Contract law
1.0 INTRODUCTION All people do not have the same legal capacity to make contract. In some case the legal capacity of the person has no relation to the individual’s actual ability. A person who is 17 years old for example‚ may have just as much to make a contract as an older person. Nevertheless a17 years old are ordinarily under a legal incapacity. In other cases such as those involving insane persons‚ the legal incapacity is based upon the inability to understand the consequences of the particular
Free Common law Law Contract
Issue: The issue in this problem have 4 problems. This is whether or not there is fraudulent misrepresentation. And whether or not there is the legal contract. At the same time‚ whether or not the oral evidence rule it included. And it have whether or not the consumer guarantee. Rule- Fraudulent misrepresentation Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when one makes representation with intent to deceive and with the knowledge that it is false. According to Andy and Douglas1 .An action for fraudulent
Premium Contract Contract law
NO.: MODULE: BUSINESS LAW LECTURER: MR MAHADEVAN LUKSHUMAYEH Question: In early 2013‚ Beauty property developer negotiated with Stylish over a new house in the eastern sector of Singapore. Beauty and Stylish had various meetings about the cost and finish of the house. At one of their meetings‚ Stylish asked Beauty whether the price of the house included curtains‚ blinds and window coverings. Beauty explained that all window coverings were provided for in the contract. Several weeks later Stylish
Premium Contract Contract law Damages
2.3 Impact of Different Types of Contracts The agreement was binding. The Court of Appeal distinguished the case of Balfour v Balfour (HPH 202) on the grounds that the parties were separated. Where spouses have separated it is generally considered that they do intend to be bound by their agreements. The written agreement signed was further evidence of an intention to be bound.. In this case of husband and wife is a domestic agreement‚ they jointly owned a house. Husband left to live with another
Premium Contract Tort Contract law
1. How do you distinguish between an offer and an invitation to treat? The word ‘proposal’ bears the same meaning as ‘offer’ in English law. Offer is an agreement between two or more parties is constituted by a proposal and an acceptance of it. An offer is made ‘when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything‚ with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence’. For instance‚ thus A‚ by offering to buy B’s car for $10‚000
Premium Contract Common law Contract law
Advise what legal liabilities arise out of this situation. Cite case authority where relevant. ISSUES Is Bob liable to Mary and to what extent? Does Bob have any defenses? Is Tom liable to Sam and to what extent? LAW In this case we are dealing with tort law and more specifically negligence in tort law. Negligence in tort law requires the plaintiff to prove the following: * The
Premium Tort Contract Reasonable person
Agency‚ with special focus on the liabilities involved between the parties. The Law of Agency: General Concepts Agency Laws comes under the purview of Commercial Law. The Indian Contract Act 1872‚ Section 182 defines an Agent as “a person employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons”. The other person to whom the agent is employed to is said to be the Principal. The law of agency helps form the different contractual‚ quasi-contractual relationships
Premium Contract Contract law Agency law
Question 1 | | 1 / 1 point | Law is a body of enforceable rules governing relationships among individuals and between individuals and their society. | True | | False | View Feedback | | Correct. | Question 2 | | 1 / 1 point | The doctrine ofstare decisis obligates judges to follow precedents established within their jurisdictions. | True | | False | View Feedback | | Correct. | Question 3 | | 1 / 1 point | Common law develops from rules of law announced in court decisions
Premium Law Common law Stare decisis