Dr. RAM MANOHAR LOHIYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW. SESSION 2013-2014 A Project on " Immunity of agent- a detailed study" Under the Supervision of Dr Visalakshi Vegesna Assistant Professor Submitted by Umaima Shahnawaz B.A.L.L.B(Hons.) IIIrd Semester Roll no-147 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my teacher Dr. Visalakshi Vegesna who gave me the golden opportunity to do this wonderful project on the topic " Immunity of agent- a detailed
Premium Contract
Contract Law Introduction In the following case note I will examine the High Court case; Smart Telecom Plc. V Radio Teilefis Eireann & Glanbia Plc. [2006] IEHC 176. The essence of this case is one involving a request for tenders put forward by RTE for sponsorship and the subsequent refusal of Smart Telecom’s referential bid thereto. The questions raised were (1) whether referential bidding was a permissible term of RTE’s offer and (2) if not‚ were they were obliged to re-tender the contract
Premium Contract
CONTRACT OF LAW Contract can be defined as ‘an agreement enforceable by law’. In other words‚ a contract is an agreement made between two(2) parties or more which is legally binding between the parties. There are six (6) basic elements in the contract : 1. Offer refers to a proposal that is capable of being converted into an agreement by its acceptance. Section 2(a) of Contract Act 1950 provides that when a person signifies another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything‚ with
Premium Contract
L.S. 4523 / 5523 Handout 9 Spring‚ 2013 1. What is a material breach of contract? There are three types of material breach. Anticipatory repudiation: A repudiation of contract obligations before they become due. Must be unequivocal (clear statements of a parties refusal to preform when performance is due.) No assurance (demanded writing exceeds 30 days) = repudiation. 1.) Waffling Seller: A seller who equivocates when asked if he’s going to deliver the goods as promised. 2.) Cash
Premium Contract Breach of contract Contract law
Contents of Contract Flow Chart Statements made during negotiations Conditions and Warranties Implied Terms Expressed Terms Terms Discharge of the Contract Discharge of the Contract continued Remedies available for breach of contract ----------------------- Express terms: Whether any dispute arises as to meaning of a contract it becomes necessary to construe (interpret) the terms of contract in order to ascertain intention
Premium Contract Contractual term Contract law
Court Court of Common Pleas Citation(s) (1862) 11 Cb (NS) 869; [1862] EWHC CP J35; 142 ER 1037 Transcript(s) Full text of judgment Judge(s) sitting Willes J‚ Byles J and Keating J Felthouse v Bindley (1862) EWHC CP J 35‚ is the leading English contract law case on the rule that one cannot impose an obligation on another to reject one ’s offer. This is sometimes misleadingly expressed as a rule that "silence cannot amount to acceptance". Later the case has been rethought‚ because it appeared that
Premium Contract Plaintiff Defendant
1950. The law applicable are Sec 26 of CA has stated that agreement made without consideration is void. According to Sec 2(d) of CA‚ consideration is an act or abstinence or promise by the promisee or any other person as required by the promisor in return for his promise. Literally‚ it means something that is given in return for something else. On the other hand‚ there was an exceptions under Sec 26 of CA which is an agreement without consideration is void unless the contract made on account
Premium Contract Adoption
Contract of sale Table of content 1. The seller’s duty to protect 2. The seller’s duty to deliver 3.1 The meaning of delivery 3.2 How delivery occurs 3. The seller’s ability for latent defects 4.3 General principles 4.4 Requirements for liability 4.5 Scope of the seller’s liability 4.6 Waiver at the time of conclusion of the agreement 4.7 Latent defects in repairs 4. The manufacture & dealer’s liability for latent defect 5
Premium Marketing Contract Contract law
JUDGMENT V.N. Khare‚ CJI 1. This appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 23-11-2001 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam revolves round the question as to whether an arbitration clause in a contract agreement survives despite purported satisfaction thereof. 2. The parties to this appeal entered into an agreement for a project at Kayamkulam. Upon completion of the work the respondent herein submitted final bill which was allegedly not accepted by the appellant‚ where
Premium Arbitration Contract
a valid contract is that it complies with all of the legal requirements for a contract. There are several types of contracts. First is a unilateral contract‚ which is one that only one of the parties involved makes the promise. The other party involved would than act in return for the promise stated. A bilateral contract is when both partied make a promise. An implied contract is when there are surrounding circumstances along with facts‚ which show that a promise was created. A contract is not executed
Premium Contract Contract law