NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY BANGALORE M.B.L. PART – I CONTRACT LAWS Important Case Laws 1. Balfour v. Balfour [(1919) 2 KB 571] Mr. Balfour promised to send £ 30 every month. Mr. Balfour did not send the money Mrs. Balfour sought to recover the promise money in the court of law. Whether a promise of domestic nature between a husband & wife could be binding? Held that‚ the promise between the parties was not intended by them to be legally binding. Hence‚ Mrs. Balfour could not
Premium Contract
LABOUR LAW LECTURER: MR MUPANI NAMES: TAFADZWA N MOYO M112877 TAFADZWA MUTIWANYUKA M BELIEVE G MBULAWA M TERENCE MATASHU M ABIGAIL MABVIRAKARE M CARLEEN KATURUZA M FRANCISCA ZVENYIKA M MARY SHIRICHENA M Labour law according to Gwisai (2006) refers to the system of rules that regulate the voluntary relationships arising from the workplace and whose enforcement is guaranteed by the state as law. According to the labour act Chap 28.01‚ labour law is referred
Premium Law Employment Organizational studies and human resource management
was established following the case of Partridge v Crittenden. If Celia’s advertisement was an offer‚ she would be contractually obliged to sell her goods to every customer even if there is no continuity of stock. Hence‚ she is liable for breach of contract if there were more acceptances than she can satisfy as only 5 handbags are up for sale. Furthermore‚ the advertisement does not include further details on the bags and leaves room for negotiation. It states that it is suitable for all tastes and
Premium Contract Invitation to treat Offer and acceptance
There are four main elements that must be in a contract to deem it valid. The first of which is an offer. The offer is the initial start to any interaction from one or more parties intending to enter into a contract. An offer is defined as‚ the price at which an individual is willing to sell a security or commodity. This is the opposite of bid‚ which is the price at which an individual is willing to buy a security. An offer is the same as an Ask. The person to make the offer or have something
Premium Contract
to Jenny is not binding. Advise Jenny as to whether she has any cause of action against her father. This case pertains whether a clear promise was demonstrated to form a legal contract between Jenny and her father to determine whether Jenny has any cause of action against her father. According to the contracts act 1950‚ section 2(d)‚ when at the desire of the promisor‚ the promise or any other person has done or abstained from doing‚ or does or abstains from doing‚ or promises to do or to
Premium Contract
THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE MELBOURNE LAW SCHOOL CORPORATE LAW BLAW20001 2013 Subject Coordinator: Associate Professor Helen Anderson |A. WELCOME TO CORPORATE LAW | |B. INTRODUCTORY MATTERS | |C. LECTURE OUTLINE‚ READING GUIDE and TUTORIAL PROGRAM | |D. SKILLS ASSIGNMENT |
Premium Board of directors Corporation Corporations law
Q1: What is a tort? Tort: A civil wrong not arising from a breach of contract; a breach of a legal duty that proximately causes harm or injury to another. Q2: What are the four elements of negligence? They are Duty‚ Breach‚ Injury‚ and Causation. Q3: Is Shannon liable for the tort of negligence? Yes‚ she is. First of all‚ she has been told by her physician that not to drive after taking the medication. Thus she has the duty not to drive in order to take care
Premium Tort law Tort English-language films
Review for Midterm The exam is multiple-choice. Many of the questions are conceptual in nature‚ so although you will have to understand the principles presented‚ in many instances you will also have to apply those principles. If English is your second language‚ you may bring a dictionary with you. (book form‚ not electronic) The dictionary can either be an English dictionary or a dictionary between English and your first language. There will be 25 questions on the exam. The chapters on the
Premium Contract law Contract
Memorandum Neurology Associates‚ LLP Vs Elizabeth Blackwell‚ M.D Question Presented: Is the contract between Dr. Blackwell and Neurological Associates enforceable‚ under Longville Law? Facts: When considering the case between Dr. Blackwell and Neurological Associates there are several important facts that need to be laid out. These facts will help determine if the contract between Dr. Black and Neurological Associates (NA) is valid. In May 2015 Dr. Elizabeth Blackwell had earned her medical doctor
Premium Contract Sign Contract law
Bus 201 Spring 2009 Final Prof. Isler May 28‚ 2009 The final exam will be given at 8:10 and will end at 10:10. In the True/False section mark "a" for True and "b" for False. In the multiple choice section you should select the best answer. Raw exam scores‚ the exam and exam answers will be posted today by 5:00 PM. The exam is not cumulative. Place only your Student ID Number on your Scantron not your name. Five questions will be deducted if your name or Social Security Number is placed on your
Premium Contract Contract law