Question Martina owns two houses in Loughchester. In May‚ she entered into a contract with Loughchester University for it to rent the houses for the coming academic year for use as student accommodation. The University paid Martina £750 straight away‚ with the rent to be paid to Martina by the University monthly in arrears. Martina then engaged Roger Roofers Ltd to carry out repairs on the roofs of the houses‚ to be completed by 23 September‚ in time for the arrival of the students. She paid Roger
Premium Crime United States Learning
Invitation to Sociology Peter L. Berger (1963‚ pp. 23–24) [2] noted in his classic book Invitation to Sociology‚ “The first wisdom of sociology is this—things are not what they seem.” Social reality‚ he said‚ has “many layers of meaning‚” and a goal of sociology is to help us discover these multiple meanings. He continued‚ “People who like to avoid shocking discoveries…should stay away from sociology.” As Berger was emphasizing‚ sociology helps us see through conventional understandings of how
Premium Sociology
Pre-Incorporation Contract Problem A creative use of the common law provides a number of ways of avoiding the common law pre-incorporation contract problem discussed above. 1. Promoter as Trustee of a Chose in Action: The promoter could be treated as a trustee of a chose in action for the corporation. This would put the promoter under a fiduciary obligation to enforce the contract and would allow an order permitting the company to sue in the name of the promoter as trustee. 2. Company as
Premium Corporation Contract Common law
2nd of feb CASES MALLIK V BCC: Malik and Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1997] UKHL 23 is a leading English contract law and UK labour law case‚ which confirmed the existence of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence in all contracts of employment. Facts: Mr Malik and Mr Mahmud both worked for the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. BCCI went insolvent due to massive fraud‚ connection with terrorists‚ money-laundering‚ extortion and a raft of other criminal
Premium Contract Breach of contract
WEEK 3 – THE FORMATION OF CONTRACTS Apply Your Knowledge (EXERCISE 4 – CONTRACT OR NOT?) Review the essential elements of a valid and enforceable contract and decide whether a valid‚ void or voidable contract has been formed in each of the following situations. Provide a legal explanation for your decision. 1. Last year‚ Smith‚ the owner of a retail business‚ in an attempt to reduce employee absenteeism due to illness‚ offered to give any employee who quit smoking for a year a $500
Premium Contract
1 App Cas 554 has been criticised where ‘a valuable consideration‚ in the sense of the law‚ may consist either in some right‚ interest profit or benefit accruing to the one party or some forbearance‚ detriment‚ loss or responsibility‚ given‚ suffered or undertaken by the other’. Due to Angela falling ill‚ Nick accepts half the original amount of rent being payment of a lesser sum but the rule at common law being the rule in Pinnel ’s Case (1602) 5 Co Rep 117a‚ is that the payment of a lesser
Premium Contract
res ipsa loquitur- the facts speak for themselves It means that the plaintiff can prima facie establish negligence where the facts are so obvious that somebody must be negligent otherwise the accident would not have happen. In the common law of negligence‚ the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur (Latin: the thing speaks for itself) states that the elements of duty of care and breach can be sometimes inferred from the very nature of the accident‚ even without direct evidence of how any defendant
Premium Tort law Tort Duty of care
You have had a number of different problems with the item including the following: • Did not match the model you saw on display in the store or the picture on the box • The screen was slightly damaged when you first took it out of the box • Not able to make or receive calls periodically • Not able to connect to the internet • Not able to access the settings • Switching itself off when making calls • Getting extremely hot when it is on charge There are laws to protect consumers against scenarios
Free Mobile phone Telephone Legal terms
Tutorial 5 1. Naeve Soh‚ a diploma holder enters into an employment contract with a company as an accounting assistant. The working hours are 8am to 9pm daily except for Sundays and Public Holidays. The pay is $2100 per month. The market rate for a similar job is $3700 and employees in similar jobs in other companies work generally only from 8 am to 6 pm. After working for two months Naeve Soh feels all this is very unfair and wants to challenge it. (a) Assuming there is no statute prohibiting
Premium Contract
Contracts Cyril made two contracts. The first was to have his house painted one month from the date of the written contract. The second was for his neighbor’s 1957 Ford Thunderbird. Each contract was definite and clear in all respects. As to the house painting‚ Cyril inquired with the painter as to when the work could begin. The painter explained that he was extremely busy and was not sure if he could fulfill the contract. Cyril flew into a rage and immediately hired someone else
Premium Contract law Lawsuit Automobile