Universiteit van Amsterdam Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid Anglo-American Contract and Tort law Interpretation of contracts ‘’ To what extend does the interpretation of Dutch contracts differ from English contracts. ’’ Naam: A.N.Y. van der Looij Studentnummer: 5610303 Begeleider: Professor H. Beale Amsterdam‚ 14th of June 2013 Table of contents Chapter 1 Preface 3 1.1 Neccessity of interpretation 3 1.2 ‘’Objective’’ and ‘’Subjective’’ interpretation 3
Premium Common law Contract Law
Contract is an agreement between two or more competent parties in which an offer is made and accepted‚ and each party benefits. No contract can come into being unless the following features exist: an actual offer‚ an acceptance‚ consideration (this means that each party will contribute something of a material value to the bargain) and an intention to create legal relations. The agreement can be formal‚ informal‚ written‚ or just plain understood. (a) For a contract to exist the offer must be made
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance
Asif Tufal Contract-Law-page CASES ON FORMATION OF A CONTRACT OFFER Payne v Cave (1789) The defendant made the highest bid for the plaintiff’s goods at an auction sale‚ but he withdrew his bid before the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer. It was held that the defendant was not bound to purchase the goods. His bid amounted to an offer which he was entitled to withdraw at any time before the auctioneer signified acceptance by knocking down the hammer. Note: The common law rule laid down in
Premium Contract
accepts the offer and they sign a contract to that effect. After the contract is signed‚ Teri learns of a Boston rule that all firefighters must live within the Boston city limits. Teri decides not to move and contacts Jack to let him know she won’t be moving after all. Jack sues Teri in municipal court‚ asking for specific performance in accordance with the original deal. Teri argues that‚ although specific performance is usually appropriate in land sales contract cases‚ the judge has the discretion
Premium Contract
Zidisha Microfinance Member Legal Contract This is a legally binding contract between (Applicant Name) ____________________________________________ of Address ____________________________________________________________________________________ and National Identity Number ___________________________ and Zidisha Inc. (Zidisha)‚ a nonprofit organization located at 21900 Muirfield Circle #302‚ Sterling‚ Virginia 20164 United States. I‚ (Applicant Name) ____________________________________________
Premium Debt Credit Interest
CONTRACT AND RELATED OBLIGATION Prof. Hillman I) Theories of Obligation A) CONTRACT: Agreement with Consideration – Bargain Theory of Consideration Definition: A promise that is supported by consideration because the promisor gets something (extracts) from the promissee in exchange for the promise. Ex: I tell Alice I will sell her my piano for 400 dollars and she agrees. I promised my piano in exchange for something (400 dollars) therefore my promise is enforceable. 1) Bargained
Premium Contract
common law‚ a contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties that sets an exchange of promises of what each party will or will not do".(Elliott‚2011‚p.13) The contract can be unilateral and bilateral. if the oferee can accept simply by promising to perform‚ the contract is bilateral. Bilateral contract is a "promise for a promise"‚ and in order to be formed‚ is not need for consideration to be made at the time when the promises are exchanged . In a unilateral contract‚one party
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance Invitation to treat
Contract Law Introduction In the following case note I will examine the High Court case; Smart Telecom Plc. V Radio Teilefis Eireann & Glanbia Plc. [2006] IEHC 176. The essence of this case is one involving a request for tenders put forward by RTE for sponsorship and the subsequent refusal of Smart Telecom’s referential bid thereto. The questions raised were (1) whether referential bidding was a permissible term of RTE’s offer and (2) if not‚ were they were obliged to re-tender the contract
Premium Contract
JUDGMENT V.N. Khare‚ CJI 1. This appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 23-11-2001 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam revolves round the question as to whether an arbitration clause in a contract agreement survives despite purported satisfaction thereof. 2. The parties to this appeal entered into an agreement for a project at Kayamkulam. Upon completion of the work the respondent herein submitted final bill which was allegedly not accepted by the appellant‚ where
Premium Arbitration Contract
Journal of Organizational Behavior J. Organiz. Behav. 24‚ 537–559 (2003) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/job.205 Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity ´ ANS DE VOS1*‚ DIRK BUYENS2 AND RENE SCHALK3 1 Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School‚ Gent‚ Belgium Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and Ghent University‚ Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
Premium Integrated circuit Psychology Socialization