his being dismissed on the grounds of permanent ill health - which probably added to his stress levels. As a result of this dismissal following the second nervous breakdown‚ Walker claimed compensation from his employer‚ claiming that they were in breach of their common-law duty of care to provide a safe working environment. He was successful in his claim on the grounds that his employer had been made aware that he was under extreme pressure at work‚ witness the initial nervous breakdown.
Premium Employment Tort Law
offer‚ acceptance‚ and consideration will not guarantee a legally enforceable contract”. Discuss. A contract is an agreement which normally consists of an ’offer ’ and an ’acceptance ’ and involves the ’meeting of the minds ’ or consensus between two or more parties with the intention to create a legally enforceable binding contract. Therefore in this essay‚ the four core elements needed for the formation of a contract such as offer‚ acceptance‚ and consideration and intention to create legal relations
Premium Contract Contract law
As our textbook explains fraud invalidates a contract. “The presence of fraud affects the authenticity of the innocent party’s consent to a contract. When an innocent party is fraudulently induced to enter into a contract‚ the contract usually can be avoided because she or he has not voluntarily consented to the terms. Normally‚ the innocent party can either cancel the contract and be restored to her or his original position or enforce the contract and seek damages for harms resulting from the fraud
Premium Damages Judicial remedies Contract law
Different approach taken by the Court of Appeal in Williams v Roffey was it fair or not? It is commonly accepted within the English Contract Law that the models of contractual fairness must exist in contractual disputes. Essential to these models is the doctrine of consideration and the principles that comes under the doctrine of consideration such as laws derived from both Williams v Roffey (1990) and Stilk v Myrick (1809). Starting with the development of the doctrine of consideration and
Premium Contract Contract law
isn’t going to end well. Additionally‚ the FBI and the Computer Security Institute‚ in their annual survey on computer crime and information security‚ gathered the following disturbing facts in 1998: 1) 64 percent of respondents reported a security breach in 1998 — up 16 percent from the previous year; 2) security breaches cost the respondents who could quantify losses a total of $136‚822‚000 — up 35 percent over the previous year; 3) 18 percent of respondents had no idea whether or not they had been
Premium Computer security Computer Security
2 MAIN CONTRACT The Employer shall make the Main Contract (other than the details of the Employer’s prices thereunder as stated in the bills of quantities or schedule of rates and prices as the case may be) available for inspection to the Contractor with and‚ if so requested by the Contractor‚ shall provide the Contractor with a certified true copy of the Main Contract (less such details of the Employer’s price)‚ at the cost of the Contractor. The Contractor shall be deemed to have examined the
Premium
into contract. Most people believe that minors’ are considered incompetent. It is said that if a person does not have the mental capacity to understand a that a contract is being made or the general nature of the contract‚ the person lacks contractual capacity. So then why would someone enter a contract with one. That is why I would have to say the first advantage is that most minors’ which means anyone under the age of 18‚ are allowed to enter into contracts. However‚ minors’ contracts are
Premium Contract Contract law Common law
A stranger to a contract can’t sue…!!!! Submitted by:- Ankit Bhardwaj 091004 M.B.A. III sem. The basic answer to this question is ‘NO’‚ as the following literature supports and explains this fact effectively. A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that creates an obligation to do or not to do something. The parties
Premium Common law Contract law Law
Team Contract: Team Name__ Definition of group and objectives. Team __ shall be comprised of and organized by _______________________________. It will be the aim of said team to successfully complete CS 1 with the maximum of grade performance and to ensure the understanding of all tenets‚ facts‚ and errata connected with the study of the CS 1 curriculum for all group members. Each team member will be assigned specific roles (Manager‚ Recorder‚ Skeptic) and the roles will rotate during the
Premium Management The A-Team Team
Dr. RAM MANOHAR LOHIYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW. SESSION 2013-2014 A Project on " Immunity of agent- a detailed study" Under the Supervision of Dr Visalakshi Vegesna Assistant Professor Submitted by Umaima Shahnawaz B.A.L.L.B(Hons.) IIIrd Semester Roll no-147 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my teacher Dr. Visalakshi Vegesna who gave me the golden opportunity to do this wonderful project on the topic " Immunity of agent- a detailed
Premium Contract