Contract With America In the historic 1994 midterm elections‚ Republicans won a majority in Congress for the first time in forty years‚ partly on the appeal of a platform called the Contract with America. Put forward by House Republicans‚ this sweeping ten-point plan promised to reshape government. Its main theme was the decentralization of federal authority‚ deregulation‚ tax cuts‚ reform of social programs‚ increased power for states‚ a balanced federal budget were its chief ambitions. With
Premium United States House of Representatives President of the United States Bill Clinton
Hartly & The Auto Dealer What do you think about this situation? Should parties to a sales contract be able to rescind a contract because of mutual mistake of fact? Why or why not? Did either party act unethically in this case? Why or why not? What application does the UCC have here? Finally‚ in the overall context of contract law‚ are there any winners or losers when a contract is rescinded based on mutual mistake of fact? Why or why not? In my studies of the case‚ I read about
Premium Contract
A valid contract consists of all essential components which present and the court will enforce as a legally binding promise . One of the elements contract to create a contract is agreement which included an offer and acceptance. “Acceptance is a final and unqualified assent to the terms of the offer‚ made in the manner specified or indicated by the offeror” . Acceptance may be express orally‚ in writing‚ occasionally‚ or even by implied from the offeree’s conduct. In communication of acceptance‚
Premium Contract Contract law Offer and acceptance
BUS103 Assignment Ellyn Hurst Florentina Benga Wednesay 4.00 – 5.00 Word count: 1418 A contract is an agreement containing promises made between two or more parties with the intention of creating legal rights and obligations enforceable in a court of law. There are three essential elements that must be proven to establish a contract. The first element that must be established is whether or not there was an agreement between the parties. There must be an offer proposed by on party‚ and
Premium Contract Invitation to treat
plan 3 As-is assessment 4 Supply market research 5 Market forecasts 5 External and market analyses 6 Detailed supplier evaluation and research 7 Evaluate current and alternative strategies 8 Understand contract formation 8 Strategy and resource commitment 305 AU2789_book.fm Page 306 Tuesday‚ July 26‚ 2005 12:13 AM 306 Ⅲ Supply Market Intelligence Chapter/ Appendix Function Objective Tactical Step Strategic sourcing
Premium Contract Interpersonal relationship
Harrison asked Sadia Warsame to write reports on the Contract of Employments. This report will be used to help the readers to gain more Knowledge and Information. 2.0 Procedure Information was obtained by 2.1 Visiting www.acas.org.uk . 2.2 Reading a book called Glossary of Employment Terms by Peter Chandler. 2.3 At work from colleuages. 3.0 Findings 3.1 Contract of Employment. Contract of Employment is a contract between an employer and employee‚ established after
Premium Contract Employment Trade union
By the case of Hughes v Metropolitan Railway Co the doctrine of Promissory Estoppel was establish and the derivation of modern doctrine of it is to be found in the The doctrine of Promissory Estoppel was first developed but was lost for some time until it was resurrected by Lord Denning in the leading case of Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd. Promissory estoppel There are three exceptions to the rule in Pinnel’s case. They are composite agreement‚ payment of debt
Premium Contract Common law Law
reward? Whether Bakar can revoke the offer for reward after the climbers have started climbing the mountain? Law According to s.2(h) of the Contract Act‚ a contract is an agreement enforceable by law. For example‚ offer acceptance. According to s.2(a) and Ho Ah Kim v Paya Trubong Estate‚ proposal is an action that shows willingness to enter into a contract. Invitation to treat is an invitation to make a proposal. According to Coelhor Public Services Commission and Syarikat Gunung Sejahtera V Lim
Premium Contract Invitation to treat Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
19. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of management contract to both the hotel owner and the management company? The advantage of the management contract is: The management contract incurs minimum risk to the company as compared to sole ownership and joint-venture development since the management company has little or minimal equity invested in the hotel. The hotel management company only assigns a group of professional managers to operate the property for the owner. If political crisis
Premium Hotel chains Hotel Hyatt
Contract closing a method of costing large projects‚ where the contracted work will run over several accounting periods Every organisation will have its own costing system with characteristics which are unique to that particular system. However‚ although each system might be different‚ the basic costing method used by the organisation is likely to depend on the type of activity that the organisation is engaged in. The costing system would have the same basic characteristics as the systems
Premium Cost accounting Cost Costs