An accused who chooses to testify can be crossed examined on prior convictions to call into question his or her dispute of the truth. This is true of both adult and youth convictions in spite of protections surrounding youth records and the perception that such records are sealed. In essence‚ a matter of sentencing should be adapted to suit a need or purpose so that it fits
Premium Crime Criminology Juvenile delinquency
healthcare are Conviction‚ visionary‚ possessing emotional intelligence‚ decision making‚ and critical thinking. 1. Exceptional leaders are strongly driven by their personal convictions‚ which may include religious beliefs‚ deeply held connections to a community‚ or a fundamental sense of morality.1 The kind of leader with personal conviction‚ have high integrity and ethics and are comfortable with their values and beliefs and at the same time they are also able to put their convictions in check and
Premium Leadership Management Positive psychology
the ever evolving development of values. Often parental educating practices are substantiated with devout religious teachings. Many people equate standards and religious convictions with ethical behavior. An individual can have very high standards‚ honesty‚ loving‚ and giving without possessing any devout convictions in God or salvation. As people proceed through life‚ they have distinct knowledge that may sway standards in an affirmative or contradictory manner. An individual‚ who is educated
Premium Ethics Morality Virtue
CRIMINAL LAW-I CASE ANALYSIS DR. RAM MANOHAR LOHIA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW (2013-2014) CRIMINAL LAW-I FINAL DRAFT OF CASE STUDY ON LALLAN RAI v. STATE OF BIHAR SUBMITTED BY PAAVAN AWASTHI Roll no.-85 SUBMITTED TO Dr. K.A. Pandey ASST. PROFFESOR of LAW Sec-B‚ Semester-3 RMLNLU 2ND Year. PAAVAN AWASTHI‚ Roll No. 85‚ 3rd SEM‚ B.A. LL.B. (HONS)‚ RMLNLU 1|Page CRIMINAL LAW-I CASE ANALYSIS TITLE LALLAN RAI AND OTHERS……………………………………………..….APPELLANTS Versus
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Supreme court Criminal law
BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. After publicly burning an American flag as a means of political protest‚ Gregory Lee Johnson was convicted of desecrating a flag in violation of Texas law. This case presents the question whether his conviction is consistent with the First Amendment. We hold that it is not. I While the Republican National Convention was taking place in Dallas in 1984‚ respondent Johnson participated in a political demonstration dubbed the "Republican War Chest Tour."
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution
1. Withdrawal of money not belonging to Scarlett Scarlett Scofflaw could be charged under s 322(1)‚ Theft under the Criminal Code. Scarlett could be charged with theft because she knew the money in her account was not hers‚ yet spent the money anyway. Scarlett should have contacted the bank immediately when she noticed the extra money that appeared in her account. Scarlett would have to prove that she deposited the money into her account‚ however; the bank mistakenly transferred the money into Scarlett’s
Premium Baseball Withdrawal Error
Considering all the information provided I believe the appellant should be sentenced and charged. It is understandable that when one is involved in a case that can lead to time in jail‚ when it is the appellants turn to talk‚ the appellant might say the wrong thing at the wrong time. It is known that at one point the appellant had said‚ he had never driven the green Cadillac that belongs to cristabel pierce. However‚ on page three paragraph nine evidence shows that the appellant was seen driving
Premium Crime Criminal justice Criminal law
positive correlation is found between adopted children and their foster parents‚ it shows there must be an environmental effect ‚ a study of 14000 adoptions in Denmark show that a significant number of boys with criminal convictions had biological parents with criminal convictions. This provides evidence for the influence genetic factors has in aggression. A gene called MAOA is associated with aggressive behaviour‚ it regulated the metabolism of serotonin‚ and additionally low levels of serotonin
Premium Aggression Violence Genetics
UCMJ 86 also known as AWOL or absence without leave is defined as any member of the armed forces who without proper authorization fails to be at appointed place of duty at the time ordered. Another form of it would be if a soldier goes from that place or absents him or herself from his or her oraganization‚ unit‚ or place of duty at which he or she is ordered to be at. Such disobedient actions shall be punished as directed by a court marshall. Going further into failing to go to appointed place
Premium Soldier Military Non-commissioned officer
Rule-consequentialists tend to argue for their normative theory by claiming that their view matches our moral convictions just as well as a pluralist set of Rossian duties. As an additional advantage‚ rule-consequentialism offers a unifying justification for these duties. I challenge the first part of the ruleconsequentialist argument and show that Rossian duties match our moral convictions better than the rule-consequentialist principles. I ask the rule-consequentialists a simple question. In the
Premium Ethics Morality Prima facie