Essay Louise Pettiford What must be done to improve ethics in finance and corporate governance? Corporate governance can be referred to the rules‚ processes‚ or laws by which businesses are operated‚ regulated and controlled. It can also refer to internal factors defined by the officers‚ stockholders or constitution of a corporation. After finding the meaning of Corporate governance‚ which can also be referred to corporate responsibility‚ I thought about the policies in which the company I work
Premium Ethics Business ethics Corporate governance
❖ S 9: “Officer” includes directors‚ secretaries‚ receivers‚ administrators‚ liquidators‚ administrating trustees. ❖ S 9: “Director” includes shadow & de facto directors. enforcement of directors’ duties enforcement of statutory duties Civil penalties Who may apply for a Declaration or Order? ❖ S 1317J(1): ASIC may apply for a declaration of contravention‚ a pecuniary penalty order or a compensation order. ❖ S 1317J(2): The company may apply for a compensation order. ❖
Premium Fiduciary Board of directors Stock
COMPETITION LAW EFFECTIVE TOOL FOR GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN INDIA Submitted to Prof. I. Sridhar Legal Aspects of Business IIM Indore By Vinod Kumar 2012FPM20 Section F IIM INDORE TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE NO. A. Introduction 1. Introduction...............................................................................................3 B. Analysis 2. Analysis of property rights in the case of tangibles................................4 3. Common features of Intellectual property
Premium Competition law Corporate governance Governance
Corporate Governance We are pursuing sound and efficient management and strengthening our governance structure for putting the Fujitsu Way into practice. Our Basic Stance We have articulated the "Fujitsu Way" in the form of our Corporate Vision‚ Corporate Values‚ Principles‚ and Code of Conduct. By sharing and practicing the Fujitsu Way‚ we aim to continuously enhance the value of the company through the ongoing growth and development of the Fujitsu Group. In order to continually raise the
Premium Management Corporate governance Board of directors
of a non-executive director as ‘custodian of the governance process.’ A non-executive director (NED) sits on the board of company just as a normal executive director would do so‚ however a non-executive director does not form part of the executive management team of the company. Essentially they are not an employee of the company or affiliated in any way other than their role as an independent NED. The distinction between a non-executive director and an executive director is illustrated in Equitable
Premium Corporate governance Board of directors Executive director
Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd [Pursuant to 384th Meeting of Board of Directors dated 8th February‚ 2013 Agenda No: A-15] CUSTOMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL POLICY 1. The Grievance redressal mechanism of an organization is the gauge to measure its efficiency and effectiveness as it provides important feedback on the working of the Organization. The main purpose of a Grievance Policy is to place an appropriate mechanism whereby the Customer who believe(s) that he/ she has been wronged
Premium Board of directors Managing director Customer
COURSE: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (CG 601) LECTURER NAME; MR G.A.W KACHALI CANDIDATE REGISTRATION NUMBER: 22 GGM 10895 Student Name; GEOFREY SHUMA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Overview 2 3. Corporate Governance definition 2 4. Good Corporate Governance 3 5. Historical Background of Corporate Governance 4 6. Impact of Corporate Governance 5 7. Parties to Corporate Governance
Premium Corporate governance Internal control
Theories of Corporate Governance Agency Theory • • • Separation of ownership from control Dispersed ownership structure – no single shareholder has the power to control management Economic theory suggest that managers will act in their own self interest instead of maximizing shareholders’ return Stewardship Theory Managers are good stewards of corporations and diligently work to attain high levels of corporate profit and shareholders’ returns • Different
Premium Ethics Morality Board of directors
The Recalcitrant Director If I was one of the board members‚ I would have voted for the proposal opening a temporary plant for three years. The temporary facility should be able to supply enough outputs to meet current demand for three years until the state-of-the-art manufacturing facility is completed and is fully operated. Apparently the plant had a few shortcomings‚ though these flaws would contribute to higher costs and lower profits; the facility would be closed down when the new facility
Premium
International Maritime Arbitration: Legal and Policy Issues Paper Presented to World Maritime University Malmö 14 May 2007 and to the Australian Maritime and Transport Arbitration Commission Sydney 4 December 2007 The Hon. Justice James Allsop Federal Court of Australia International Maritime Arbitration: Legal and Policy Issues.1 Abstract This paper seeks to deal with some important underlying policy questions faced by legislatures‚ governments and courts in dealing with
Premium Law Arbitration Common law