CORPORATE CONTROL AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: DOES THE TYPE OF OWNERS MATTER? Muhammad Agung Prabowo* Universitas Sebelas Maret‚ Surakarta‚ Indonesia Abstract: The paper extends the ownership study by examining the different types of large shareholders in relation to its impact on organizational outcome in Indonesia using a dataset consisting of 190 non-financial companies listed in Jakarta Stock Exchange in 2002. The study investigates the effect of family ownership‚ foreign blockholder‚ domestic institutional
Premium Corporate governance Corporation Investment
201 Corporate Governance: An International Review‚ 2013‚ 21(3): 201–224 Does “Good” Corporate Governance Help in a Crisis? The Impact of Country- and Firm-Level Governance Mechanisms in the European Financial Crisis Marc van Essen*‚ Peter-Jan Engelen‚ and Michael Carney ABSTRACT Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Question/Issue: We examine the effects of firm- and country-level “good” corporate governance prescriptions on firm performance before and during the recent financial crisis
Premium Corporate governance Board of directors
Introduction Corporate governance is the set of processes‚ customs‚ policies‚ laws‚ and institutions affecting the way a corporation is directed‚ administered or controlled. Corporate governance also includes the relationships among the many stakeholders involved and the goals for which the corporation is governed. The principal stakeholders are the shareholders‚ management‚ and the board of directors. Other stakeholders include labor(employees)‚ customers‚ creditors (e.g.‚ banks‚ bond holders)
Premium Corporate governance Board of directors Management
Question 1 (1) The maintenance of share capital principle is share capital. Share capital is the contribution made by shareholder by subscribing shares of the company. A company’s creditors can only look to the share capital for payment in the event of a winding up. A general rule known as the rule in Trevor v Whitworth was established in order to protect shareholders and creditors. It prohibits a company from reducing its share capital due to a reduction in capital would prejudice the rights of
Premium Corporate governance Board of directors
Examination Paper of Corporate Governance IIBM Institute of Business Management Examination Paper MM. 100 Corporate Governance Subject Code-C103 Section A: Objective Type & Short Questions (30 marks) This section consists of Multiple Choice questions & short questions. Answer all the questions. Part one questions carry 1 mark each & Part Two questions carry 5 marks each. Part One: Multiple Choices: 1. Corporate Governance is a) About ethical conduct in business b)
Premium Corporate governance Management Board of directors
One.Tel and its corporate governance issues Table of contents Introduction One.Tel collapse Impact of One.tel collapse Legal proceedings against One.tel’s directors Things can be learnt from One.tel’s failure Conclusion Introduction Lack of proper corporate governance can be a disaster for campanies. In recent years‚ major Australian companies such as HIH‚ One.tel and Harris Scarfe failed under dramatic and high profile circumstances. As a result‚ executive and non executive directors
Premium Corporate governance Board of directors
According to the title of the statement‚ scandals are useful in certain areas by calling our attention to some problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. Undeniably‚ it is quite appealing staying at a normative position‚ and I consent insofar as scandals do have positive effect. Nevertheless‚ scandals can sometimes distract our attention from more important things and thus reflect their negative side. It’s true that the speaker’s assertion that scandals can be useful in politics‚ academia
Premium Stem cell The Speaker Problem solving
Corporate governance Two definitions: ASX CGC: rules‚ relationship‚ systems and processes help a company to monitor and assess risk‚ optimize performance‚ create value and provide accountability. A narrow definition which consistent with agency theory focuses on relationship between company and shareholders. OECD: a system a company can be directed and controlled‚ specify rights‚ responsibilities and rules; set and achieve objectives and monitor performance. A board definition consider relationship
Premium Corporate governance Governance Principal-agent problem
(1998) 371±403 Corporate governance and board eectiveness Kose John a‚ Lemma W. Senbet a b 1 b‚* Stern School of Business‚ New York University‚ New York‚ NY 10012‚ USA Department of Finance‚ College of Business‚ University of Maryland‚ Tydings Hall‚ College Park‚ MD 20742‚ USA Abstract This paper surveys the empirical and theoretical literature on the mechanisms of corporate governance. We focus on the internal mechanisms of corporate governance (e.g.‚ corporate board of directors)
Premium Corporate governance Management Board of directors
Does the Corporate Governance Maximise Shareholders’ Wealth? | ITV PLC | | | | | Introduction/Key Objectives The main purpose of this report is to find out whether Corporate Governance (CG) does maximise shareholders’ wealth within a selected company. ITV PLC is the selected company for this report; their Annual Report (AR) 2011 will be used for statistical evidence. Also‚ existing theories will be applied to ITV PLC for qualitative evidence. Recommendations and advice will be given
Premium Corporate governance Stakeholder Balance sheet