Roberta broker never stated which shares of stock was actually sold. Furthermore‚ Roberta oral instructions never specified which specific shares of stocks she wanted to be sold. In the relevant court case Helvering v. Rankin‚ 295 U.S. 123 (1935)‚ the court decided: "When shares of stock in a corporation are sold from lots purchased at different dates and at different prices‚ and the identity of the lots cannot be determined‚ the stock sold shall be charged
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Investment
BURWELL V. HOBBY LOBBY‚ INC. 134 S. Ct 2751 (US 2014) SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES Facts: Hobby Lobby is a family owned arts and crafts store that runs on Christian principles. The companies statement of purpose is “honoring the Lord in all [they] do by operating the company in a manner consistent with Biblical principles.” The family does not believe in the use of contraception but under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)‚ the company is required to offer a minimum coverage
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States
United States v. Jones‚ United States Supreme Court (2012) 132 S. Ct. 945 Facts of the Case Respondent Jones was a subject of a Government investigation in part of a much larger drug trafficking conspiracy. As part of the investigation‚ FBI agents had obtained a court order to place a GPS tracking device on a vehicle driven by Jones – a Jeep registered to Jone’s wife. The court order was issued in the District of Columbia and was set to expire 10 days after it was signed by the judge. On Day
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Identify the most important facts surrounding the case: Dr. Y‚ a physician working for a group practice‚ is concerned about Mr. Abelson’s neurological status. Dr. Y scheduled Mrs. Abelson to be admitted to the hospital for testing. Mrs. Abelson is a 67-year-old female patient of Dr. Y. She was admitted to the hospital for a Cerebral Scan. Mrs. Abelson was admitted to the 4th floor of the hospital. After Mrs. Abelson completed the testing‚ she was returned to a room on the 5th floor. Mrs. Abelson
Premium
Case Analysis Project Introduction: There have been many cases on freedom of speech and public places. The first Amendment of the Bill of Rights provides that “Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people peaceably to assemble. Rights to free speech and assembly are not absolute under the relevant Jurisprudence. The Supreme Court has developed categories of public spaces where expressive activities may take place. ”(Gravey & Schaver‚ 1992‚ Chapter 2) As I read the case of Bruce
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Freedom of speech
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma‚ 468 U.S. 85 (1984)‚ was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) television plan violated the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts. These antitrust laws were designed to prohibit group actions that restrained open competition and trade. The NCAA was an organization that regulated college athletics‚ and membership was voluntary‚ although NCAA schools were not allowed
Premium National Collegiate Athletic Association College United States
Chapter 9 Case Analysis 1 &3 1.What arguments did the defendant make that the lawful search was connected to the unlawful search and thus was “ tainted”? Do you agree with the argument? ( United States v. Jenkins) The argument that the defendant had was that the affidavit for Room 127‚ when examined without the tainted information‚ is a “bare bones” affidavit that does not indicate “a ‘fair probability’ that evidence of a crime will be located on the premises of the proposed search. I disagree
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Evidence law
Johnson Bank v. George Korbakes & Co.‚ LLP Commercial Law 03/17/2013 Facts of the case Brandon Apparel Group‚ Inc. (“Brandon”) was involved in the business of manufacturing and sales of casual apparel as well as licensed other companies to manufacture‚ distribute and sell its clothing lines. Additionally‚ Brandon had licensing agreements with several colleges‚ universities‚ and sports organizations‚ such as the National Football League. In 1997 Brandon borrowed funds from Johnson
Premium Civil procedure Finance Plaintiff
EEOC v. Federal Express (2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 1260 [4th Cir.]) Facts: FedEx appealed a case awarding a disabled employee‚ Ronald Lockhart‚ with compensatory and punitive damages. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) the employer must be acting with malice for punitive damages to be awarded; in addition‚ there was evidence that questioned if punitive damages were warranted. FedEx claimed that Lockhart’s supervisors failed to accommodate him at work‚ not FedEx‚ and they did engage in a
Premium United States Law Appeal
Case 1: Joan I-Statement of the Problem Why Joan need more money or assistant? II- Objective of the study A. To identify Joan problem. III- Alternative Courses of Action Action 1: The solution Joan need more money and assistant and the manager should made it and give her freedom. IV- Analysis A. Positive Reaction If Joan will be given a freedom the management would find new one better than her and screened it to the fullest for her job description. B. Negative Reaction The company would
Premium Case study Garuda Indonesia