Legal Studies Assessment Case Study Identify the correct legal citation of the case Citation: R v CAMPBELL (2010) NSWSC 995 Judgement date: 3 September 2010 Parties: Regina‚ Desmond Campbell- offender Judgement of: J Latham Counsel: M Tedeschi QC/ S Herbert- (Regina)‚ S Hughes- (offender) Solicitors: S Kavanagh- Solicitor for public Prosecutions- (Regina)‚ M Bowe Solicitors (Offender) Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: R v Coulter (2005) NSWSC
Premium Law Appeal Jury
Alexis Crump Landmark Supreme Court Case: Washington V. Chrisman 11/29/9 Plaintiff: State of Washington Defendant: Chrisman Plaintiff’s Claim: The drugs that were collected in Chrisman’s dormitory room was legally obtained and could be used as evidence. Chief Lawyer for the Plaintiff: Ronald R Carpenter Chief Lawyer for the Defendant: Robert F Patrick Judges in Favor of the Court: Harry A. Blackmun‚ Sandra Day O’Connor‚ Lewis F. Powell‚ Jr.‚ William H. Rehnquist and John
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Illegal drug trade
PRICELINE V. MICROSOFT CASE STUDY Julie Ciarlante Briefly describe the specifics of patent ‘056 described in Exhibit 1 and the various court decisions around the State Street Bank & Trust Co. vs. Signature Financial Group Inc. The Issue of this case was to determine whether or not Signature ’s claimed invention the “056 Patent”‚ a data processing system‚ is drawn to statutory subject topic under 35 U.S.C 101. The Court ruling holds that the ’056
Premium Patent Law United States
The Tarasoff case is the case that “established a clinician’s duty to warn” (Mottarella‚ n.d.). Prosenjit Poddar‚ a student at University of California Berkeley (UCAL) was a patient of Dr. Lawrence Moore‚ a psychologist a hospital affiliated with UCAL. Poddar was seeking treatment for an emotional breakdown after being romantically rejected by Tatiana Tarasoff. In the course of therapy Poddar related to Dr. Moore his intent to kill Tarasoff that fall. Dr. Moore conferred with his superiors at
Premium Murder Crime Law
1ST SLIDE: Identity theft starts with the misuse of a person’s personally identifying information‚ such as name and Social Security number‚ credit card numbers or other financial account information. For identity thieves‚ this information is as good as gold. 2ND SLIDE: What do thieves do with a stolen identity? Once they have your personal information‚ identity thieves use it in a variety of ways. Credit card fraud: They may open new credit card accounts in their victim’s name. When they
Premium Identity theft Credit card fraud
question whether he states the type of the test used‚ and the total waste discharged per a timeframe not by discharged unit only. Moreover‚ since Jackson was summoned to meet with the city engineers‚ is the new test legally required to support any case‚ and if so‚ would Z-CORP be held liable for regulation violation taking the new test.
Premium
posters hung in the classroom. The students will work as teams over the next two weeks to research their topic and come up with a presentation for the class. This can be in the form of a power point‚ audio-visual‚ brochure‚ verbal presentation with Involving learners in the assessment process is a key way of helping them to manage and ‘take
Premium Assessment Educational psychology Learning
The cased being studied in this article discusses the occurrence of the military officer‚ John Doe‚ who is reported as an alleged abuser of his 13 year old daughter‚ Mary Jane. The allegations of physical abuse occurred on a Sunday afternoon when John Doe was at home on leave. He instructed his daughter‚Mary Jane‚ to do her homework after she helped with preparing dinner. She was given an hour to complete all her homework without any mistakes. When NCO Doe came back to check on her she had not yet
Premium Law Child abuse Criminal law
The Pamela Smart Case 24 year old Gregory Smart was shot dead in his New Hampshire condominium‚ which what appeared to be a botched burglary‚ just one week before his first wedding anniversary. Six weeks later William Flynn‚ age of 16‚ Vance Lattime‚ age of 17 and Patrick Randall‚ age of 18 were arrested and charged with the murder‚ all three pleaded guilty. However‚ to reduce their sentences the teenagers agreed to testify against the person they claimed persuaded them to carry out the killing:
Premium Murder Life imprisonment
ContentsIntroductionCourt DetailsThe Subject Matter of the CaseLayout of the Court and Roles of Court ParticipantsInteresting ObservationsDegree of formality in the court proceedingHow the evidence was presentedUnderstanding the Happening of a Court Room8Understanding Court ProcessReflection of Court Experience9Reference ListIntroduction:This is a report describing an observation of a criminal court proceeding that I attended at Brisbane District Court‚ Queensland. In this report I will state the kind of hearing
Premium Jury Law Court