juvenile may be brought to a juvenile court and if the crime is more severe‚ an adult court may be more appropriate. The author will discuss the differences between adult and juvenile courts. Finally‚ it will discuss what can happen if juvenile courts are abolished and implications for young offenders. Compare and
Premium Crime Criminology Sociology
neighbor Jacques during a struggle involving a gun. Questions: 1. Describe the criminal court process of this case from the arrest to the trial‚ including the role of the prosecution‚ the role of the defense attorney‚ the role of the judge‚ and the role of the jury. John will be arrested and read his Miranda rights (You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney‚ one will be
Premium Jury Law Judge
The High Courts in Malaysia are the third-highest courts in the hierarchy of courts‚ after the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal. Article 121 of the Constitution of Malaysia provides that there shall be two High Courts of coordinate jurisdiction—the High Court in Malaya and the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak (before 1994‚ the High Court in Borneo). Before 1969‚ the High Court in Singapore was also part of the Malaysian courts system (see Law of Singapore). The High Court in Malaya has
Premium Malaysia Appeal Judge
its computer operating systems market constituted a monopoly‚ and that Microsoft had taken actions to crush threats to that monopoly‚ including Apple‚ Java‚ Netscape‚ Lotus Notes‚ Real Networks and Linux. The decision was divided in two pieces and in April of 2000‚ the judge issued his decisions that Microsoft had committed monopolization‚ attempted monopolization‚ and was trying in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the
Premium United States President of the United States Supreme Court of the United States
04.03 The Decision HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER I‚ Desiree Cramier‚ write this opinion to support the majority opinion on the case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. In the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case‚ I agreed with the majority opinion. I chose this because of the fact this it was a school sponsored newspaper. I think this gives the school the right to take out those pages and also because of the nature of those articles. These articles would have without a doubt been an inconvenience and distraction for the
Premium Law First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Business Law 115 Superior Court Observation The Superior Court session I observed was an alcohol impairment case. The defendant in this case‚ had been found guilty in District Court‚ but had filed an appeal to the District Court’s decision. The morning began with the juryselection process. The potential juror pool began with approximately 30 people. The Clerk of Court‚ Wendy Williams‚drew twelve names at random form a bowl to begin the selection process. Once the initial twelve names were
Premium Jury Judge
Supreme Court of the United States ____________ FALLWELL‚ GERRY JR. PETITIONER V. CHURCH OF THE VIRTUAL VIRGIN MADONNA‚ RESPONDENT ____________ Opinion presented by Chief Justice Marcella E. Lawrence Syllabus Facts: The Church of the Virgin Virtual Madonna (C.V.V.M.) was founded in 2003‚ following the death of singer/ songwriter Madonna. Although you can trace the roots of this institution back to the 1980’s‚ it was not until Madonna died from a gunshot wound that the religious
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Religion
Making Ethical Decisions Ethics is a philosophical characteristic that relates to the moralities of human beings and the moral principles that govern one ’s behavior. Ethics are a person’s morals that govern their behavior‚ while the morals are the specific standards that cause them to (re)act. For example‚ being ethical could mean following certain laws of a society‚ or religious beliefs. The definition of what being ethical may be is subjective to what culture or society somebody is from.
Premium Ethics Morality
America (the Episcopal Church) has more liberal views‚ In 2006‚ the US Supreme Court said that legislation in Oregon allowing doctors to help people to die was constitutional‚ which means that physician assisted suicide is inline with the basic rights on which America was founded. A retired bishop from the Episcopal Church‚ John Shelby Spong‚ said: "The right to a good death is a basic human freedom. The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold aid in dying allows us to view and act on death as a dignified
Premium Euthanasia Death Medical ethics
COURT HISTORY AND PURPOSE PAPER INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT Neil Holmes CJA/224 - INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL COURT SYSTEMS 02/16/14 LEESA MC NEIL
Premium Law Judge Jury