Federal Jurisdiction Henry‚ a resident of Nevada‚ sued Adam‚ a resident of Utah in the Federal Court in California. He sought $60‚000 damages for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident that occurred in Los Angeles‚ California. Does the Federal Court have jurisdiction? No the federal court does not have jurisdiction over this case. In order for this case to fall within the guidelines of a federal suit it would have to qualify for diversity of citizenship. Diversity of citizenship exists
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
1. EGUARAS vs. GREAT EASTERN 33 PHIL 263 FACTS: Francisca Eguaras filed a written complaint in court‚ alleging as a cause of action that her son-in-law Dominador Albay had applied in writing to the defendant insurance company to insure his life for the sum of P5‚000‚ naming as the beneficiary in case of his death the plaintiff FranciscaEguaras; that after compliance with the requisites and the investigation carried on by the defendant company‚ it accepted the application for insurance and
Premium Insurance
3) Public Issues assignment: See handout. Select a Public Issue and provide an analysis of the issue by developing a conflict theory perspective. It is expected that course material‚ along with research resources‚ will be utilized in the analysis. See handout (distributed in class). Due Date: January 25th in class. This assignment is worth 25% of your final grade. It should be typed and double-spaced‚ 5-6 pages in length (1250-1500 words)‚ and include a bibliography. Late papers will not be
Free Homosexuality Same-sex marriage LGBT
That the Supreme Court exercises a policy making role has been an established fact ever since Maybury vs. Madison defined the Court’s role in judicial review of existing law. By choosing which cases to review and by establishing precedents by way interpretation of a law’s meaning and applicability the Court influences the course of action adopted not only by government but by individuals and businesses who consider the implications of the Court’s actions. In adjudicating disagreements of alternative
Premium Law Common law United States Constitution
of the court hierarchy means that there are courts that are superior to other courts. One reason for this is if you are unhappy with a decision from a particular court you can appeal your case to a higher court. Another reason for the existence of the court hierarchy is the doctrine of precedent. This allows courts higher in the hierarchy to create a precedent that all lower courts must follow‚ making sure all cases are heard in a similar manner. Another reason for the existence of the court hierarchy
Premium Law Judge Common law
Summary: Back in the NCAA football 2014 season‚ Michigan was defeated by Minnesota. Michigan lost by a score of 30 – 14. The big story that came out of the game wasn’t the final score but moreover the safety of the players participating in the game. Then Michigan Head Coach‚ Brady Hoke‚ left in a wounded player. That player was Michigan’s quarterback‚ Shane Morris. For a large portion of the second half‚ Morris was having difficulty walking after Minnesota’s Cameron Botticelli landed awkwardly
Premium
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington‚ D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F (Mark One) ‘ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended 31 March 2012 OR ‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ‘ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
Premium Balance sheet Financial statements
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE INDIAN COURTS Literally the notion of judicial review means the revision of the decree or sentence of an inferior court by a superior court. Judicial review has a more technical significance in pubic law‚ particularly in countries having a written constitution which are founded on the concept of limited government. Judicial review in this case means that Courts of law have the power of testing the validity of legislative as well as other governmental action with reference
Premium United States Constitution Law Supreme Court of the United States
Contemporary Moral Issues from a Catholic Perspective ‘Withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment’. “And the dust goes back to the earth as it was‚ and the spirit goes back to God who gave it”. (Ecclesiastes 12:7). In order for me to comprehend and discuss the moral issue of withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment from a Catholic perspective‚ I needed to have an understanding of what Bioethics refers to. It is a shared reflective analysis and discussion of ethical issues in health care
Premium Ethics Morality Medicine
The history evolution of the federal courts began to evolve as early as the Constitutional Convention held in 1787. It was during the Constitutional Convention that a resolution was adopted that “a national judiciary be established” (Neubauer & Fradella‚ 2008‚ p. 65). Of course‚ there was considerable disagreement between federalists and anti-federalists. The disagreement surrounded the fact the anti-federalists feared that individual liberties could be weakened. According to Neubauer and Fradella
Premium United States United States Constitution President of the United States