Utilitarian theorists are concerned with the maximizing the overall happiness for majority. According to this school of thought‚ morality of action is determined by the consequences of ones actions instead of agent’s intentions. Therefore‚ judging from the Utilitarian perspective‚ one can argue that Libor rate manipulation did not benefit the society as whole‚ instead it benefited couple investment banks‚ and therefore it was not an ethical action. However‚ how about if those banks actually did not
Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics Morality
ETHICAL THEORIES 1. Utilitarianism The utilitarian ethical theory is founded on the ability to predict the consequences of an action. To a utilitarian‚ the choice that yields the greatest benefit to the most people is the choice that is ethically correct. One benefit of this ethical theory is that the utilitarian can compare similar predicted solutions and use a point system to determine which choice is more beneficial for more people. This point system provides a logical and rationale argument
Premium Ethics Morality
How can we morally justify lying/deception? Lying is a process that is carried out by people of all ages‚ races‚ nationalities and societies. However‚ even though it is a common act to the majority of the world‚ it is considered morally incorrect‚ due to the fact that it provides misleading information that usually causes someone harm. There are three main components of a lie: a statement needs to be made‚ the person telling the lie must believe that the statement is false‚ and the statement must
Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics
SM0381 Frequently Asked Questions 1. General Questions 2. Reflective Statement Questions * 10pt Arial‚ single line spacing. * Your Reflective Statements should not be going over one side of A4 per entry. 3. Ethical Dilemma Essay * “In my company’s ethical dilemma the company is faced with the dilemma of…”- Woah! Wait on there! Company’s cannot have ethical dilemmas‚ they are virtual legal entities; not people. They cannot think‚ reason nor have moral debates; they aren’t
Premium Ethics
Courtroom Workgroup CJA/204 Courtroom Workgroup In The United States criminal justice system‚ a Courtroom Workgroup is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor‚ criminal defense attorney‚ and the judicial officer. This foundational concept in the academic discipline of criminal justice‚ recharacterizes the seemingly adversarial courtroom participants as collaborators in "doing justice." The courtroom workgroup was proposed by Eisenstein and Jacob in 1977 to explain
Premium Criminal law Criminal justice Jury
OPPORTUNITY CREATES ETHICAL DILEMMAS Definition of ethical dilemmas Ethical dilemmas‚ also known as a moral dilemmas‚ are situations in which there are two choices to be made‚ neither of which resolves the situation in an ethically acceptable fashion. In such cases‚ societal and personal ethical guidelines can provide no satisfactory outcome for the chooser. Ethical dilemmas assume that the chooser will abide by societal norms‚ such as codes of law or religious teachings‚ in order to make the choice
Premium Ethics Human resources Employment
witness a functional courtroom workgroup. In a perfect world‚ the process would run as smoothly as depicted on television. In this paper‚ we will examine the courtroom work group and the roles each person plays in carrying out justice. Courtroom Structure A courtroom work group is made up of a judge‚ bailiffs‚ prosecution‚ defense counsel‚ court clerks‚ court reporters‚ and expert witnesses. In other words‚ they are “professional” courtroom personnel. Also present in a courtroom for a trial are
Free Jury Judge Jury trial
CJS/200 Courtroom Players Response September 4‚ 2013 Courtroom Players Response The Courtroom Work Group is a group that is comprised of the judge‚ prosecutor‚ defense attorneys‚ claimants as well as the defendants. The roles of the individuals in the Courtroom Work Group are to work together to successfully prosecute in the criminal case. This group interacts on a daily basis with all having a mutual goal of production in mind to close the case. In my opinion a Courtroom Work Group is non-other
Premium Jury Lawyer Judge
My Perception of Personal Ethics and Professional Ethics: Ethics plays a vital role in shaping moral health of a person‚ a society‚ a government‚ or a corporate. Laws‚ and legislation however much necessary‚ will never fashion the attitude and character of a person‚ but ethics will. The sense of accountability to all stake holders‚ fair treatment to all in interpersonal relationships‚ integrity‚ and honesty are the parameters that characterize ethical behavior. Business sustainability demands
Premium Ethics Business ethics
------------------------------------------------- Courtroom workgroups ------------------------------------------------- Courtroom workgroups During trial there are ten basic roles associated with the courtroom. They are the judge‚ witness‚ prosecutor‚ the jury‚ clerk of court‚ court reporter‚ bailiff‚ defendant‚ defense counsel‚ and spectators or press. These roles make up the courtroom work group. All of these roles together help ensure the procedures of the criminal justice systems
Premium Jury Law Crime